Persian
Volume 34, Issue 1 (2019)                   GeoRes 2019, 34(1): 121-130 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
saeidirezvani N, pournasir M, ghaseri F, mousavi karkavandi S N. Evaluation of the Utility of Satellite Cities Annexation to Karaj Metropolitan as a Strategy for Urban and Regional Integrated Management. GeoRes 2019; 34 (1) :121-130
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-613-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Architecture & Urbanism, Faculty of Urbanism, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran , navidsaeidirezvani@yahoo.com
2- Department of Environment and Territory, Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy
3- Department of Technical and Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran
4- Department of Architecture & Urbanism, Faculty of Urbanism, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract   (3714 Views)
Aims & Backgrounds: Urban management is one of the pivotal elements of urban life, which has wide-ranging challenges surrounding its approaches; so that, it is one of the major concerns of metropolitan cities and the city of Karaj as well. One of the approaches is the annexation of the peripheral regions of the city in order to strengthen integrated management.
The grand objective of this research is the existence or absence of the need for the annexation of peripheral cities to the Karaj metropolis, and also the possibility or impossibility of realization of the merger based on the views of the management and urban elite community and according to valid opinions about the subject of the project.
Methodology: examine the plans and programs at the regional, district and local levels in order to clarify all the aspects of problems.
Findings: In the next step, the available internal and external resources and studies in connection with the annexation or creation of satellite cities at the national and global levels reflecting the experiences, strengths and weaknesses surrounding the research subject  were used then, the indicators  including  physical - spatial, demographic, socio-cultural, economic, political - administrative, environmental, traffic and services in the metropolises in the Karaj metropolis and the cities of Mahdasht, Mohammad Shahr, Meshkin dasht, Kemal Shahr and Garmdareh, were evaluated using related statistical tests during the last three decades and the final part of the research focused on producing and presenting scenarios and choosing the best scenario.
Conclusion: According to the outcomes of the research, it seems that conscious annexation of the Centers that are close to the main core, From the point of view of management, Is the best way to strengthen the integrity of urban and regional management.
Keywords:

References
1. Akhoundi A, Barakpou N, Asadie I, Basirat M, Taherkhani H (2008). Pathology of Forms of Municipal Government in Iran. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 41(63):135-156. [Persian]
2. Approved of Islamic Revolutionary (2010). The Law on Definitions and Rules of State Divisions; Reforms of 2010. [Persian]
3. Babaei M, Ebrahimi S (2016). Studying the Components of Integrated Urban Management in Isfahan, Urban Economy. 1(1):17-36. [Persian]
4. Barakpour N, Asadi I (2008). Final Report of Studious Plan for Urban Management and Governance in Theory. Tehran: Art University Publications. [Persian]
5. Barlow IM (1991) Metropolitan Government, Routledge, London and New York. P; 346.
6. Beall J (1996). Urban Governance: Why Gender Matters. P; 24.
7. Creswell J, Plano V (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Third edition. USA: SAGE Publications. P; 520.
8. Van Dijk MP (2006). Managing Cities in Developing Countries: the Theory and Practice of Urban Management. Edward Elgar Publication. P; 212.
9. Ebrahimi M (2013). The Review of Guidelines and Requirements for Incorporation of Khorasgan to Isfahan by using the SWOT model. Spatial Planning. 3(3):87-106. [Persian]
10. Firouznia Gh, Mousa Kazemi M, Sadeghi Taheri A (2012) Studied the effects of integrating the village in the town of: integrated villages in the city of Kashan, Geography and Development. 9(25):79-96. [Persian]
11. Habibpour K, Safari R (2016). Comprehensive manual for using Spss in survey researches. Tehran: Louye Motefakeran publication. P; 862 [Persian]
12. Hafeznia M (1996). An introduction to the research methodology in humanities. Tehran: SAMT Publication. P; 292. [Persian]
13. Haidar AH (2011) Structural equation modeling with lisrel application. Forth edition. Tehran: SAMT Publication. P; 352. [Persian]
14. Hajipour KH (2008). Examination of Effective Causes and Factors. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. 34(0):37-48 [Persian]
15. Johnson R, Turner LA, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Mixed Methods Research. 1(2):112-133. [DOI:10.1177/1558689806298224]
16. Latifi GH (2005). The analysis of Tehran's urban management during the period of 1368-76 [Dissertation] Tehran University. [Persian]
17. Lindgren M, Bandhold H (2011). Scenario planning: the link between future and strategy, Tatari, A, Translator. Tehran: Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industry publication. [Persian]
18. Mahdizadeh J (2004). Evolution in the concept, the role and structure of metropolises. Journal of Urban Management. 5(18):108-119. [Persian]
19. Miller D (2002) The Regional Governing of Metropolitan America, WestView Press Publication. First edition. P; 175.
20. Hong QN, Pluye P (2014). Combining the Power
of Stories and the Power
of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews .Annu Rev Public Health. 35:29-45 [DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440] [PMID]
21. Parhizkar A, Firouzbakht A (2012) . Iranian urban management outlook with emphasis on urban Sustainable development. Territory. 8(4):43-67. [Persian]
22. Pourlyma N, Kermani A, Alizadeh F (2012). Study of economic and physical factors in creating conflicts of annexation of the village to the city. Geography and Environmental Studies. (4):60-78. [Persian]
23. Pronello C, Pournasir M, Ghaseri F (2015). Perceived Atmosphere of Public Transport and Customer's Satisfaction: an Attitudinal Study. Proceeding of the 14th
24. International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Engineering; 2015 Feb 24-25; Iran, Tehran.
25. Saeedi N (1993). Improvement of urban management. Report of the executive secretary of the United Nations human settlements commission at the 1993 Nairobi meeting. Ministry of Interior. [Persian]
26. Saeidi Rezvani N, et al (2015). Methodology in urban studies. Second Edition. Tehran: Ketabkade kasra publication. P; 208. [Persian]
27. Saeidi Rezvani N, Abdollahi M, Ayazi M, Nozarpour A, Imani H, Salehi E (2013). Urban management. Municipality of Tehran, Department of Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran: Tisa Publications. [Persian]
28. Schwartz P (2011). The art of long view: planning in an uncertain world, Alizadeh A, Translator. Tehran: Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industry publication. [Persian]
29. Tvakolinia J, Azizpour A, Ansari T (2015). Environmental implications of the metropolitan annexation of the peripheral rural settlements after the Islamic Revolution. Quarterly Journal of International Geographical Society of Iran. 13(47):59-79. [Persian]
30. Yazdani MH, Seyedeyn A, Tayefe R (2015) Evaluation and analysis of the level of infrastructure development in rural areas of Ardabil provinc. Space Economy & Rural Development. 4(3):39-56. [Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.serd.4.13.39]
31. Zarabi A, JamaliNezhad M (2011). Role of urban management in realization of social security, research case: Isfahan province, Urban Managemet. 8(26):240-225. [Persian]