Persian
Volume 38, Issue 2 (2023)                   GeoRes 2023, 38(2): 121-132 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Alizadeh T, Azimi Amoli J, Motevalli S, Sarver R. Eco-friendly Public Transportation Scenarios of Tehran Metropolitan in 2031 Horizon. GeoRes 2023; 38 (2) :121-132
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1441-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Geography and Urban Plannin, Faculty of Humanities, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Noor, Iran
2- Department of Geography and Urban Plannin, Faculty of Literature, Science and Research Branch, Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Geography and Urban Plannin, Faculty of Humanities, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chamestan- Noor Street, Noor, Iran. Postal Code: 4641859557 (ja_azimi46@yahoo.com)
Abstract   (999 Views)
Aims: Transitioning from private transportation into public transportation, provides environmental sustainability, as well as, economic and social benefits. However, this type of sustainability in the Tehran metropolis has been less studied from a future perspective. In fact, as an interdisciplinary knowledge, future studies provide a tool to assess sustainability in public transportation systems. Therefore, the present study has evaluated the future state of the public transportation system of Tehran's metropolis from the viewpoint of compatibility with the environment.
Methodology: This is a "survey" carried out based on the experts' opinion and through the "explanatory-evaluation" path. The study is done in 2021 in order to propose possible scenarios for 2031. 12 qualified experts in "future studies" and "transportation and urban traffic", who were selected in a targeted manner, participated in this study. Data analysis was done using "theme analysis", "mean comparison" and "scenario" methods.
Findings: 8 out of 41 drives affecting the future of the public transportation system in Tehran were identified as the key drivers. Then, 11 scenarios were obtained after defining three favorable, static and critical states for each of the key drivers, in which 6 scenarios were more probable and more credible in the Tehran metropolis. However, scenario number 2, which is the continuation of the current situation, was recognized as the most likely scenario for the next 10 years in Tehran.
Conclusion: Achievement of the environmental sustainability in the future of the public transportation system of the Tehran metropolis is dependent on investment and financing the development of new technologies and environmental standards. Accurate planning and policy-making are of great importance in the achievement of this goal at the level of the metropolitan area.
Keywords:

References
1. Acheampong RA, Cugurullo F, Gueriau M, Dusparic I (2021). Can autonomous vehicles enable sustainable mobility in future cities? Insights and policy challenges from user preferences over different urban transport options. Cities. 112:1-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103134]
2. Addanki SCh, Venkataraman H (2017). Greening the economy: A review of urban sustainability measures for developing new cities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 32:1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2017.03.009]
3. Ajza Shokouhi M, Mafi E, Ebadinia F (2015). Investigating the role of urban railway in ecological and economic perspectives of transportation in Mashhad. Geography and Urban Space Development. 1(2):117-128. [Persian] [Link]
4. Alaedini P, Fayezi E (2012). Enhancing urban sustainability through alternative transport initiatives: An interim evaluation of bike-sharing pilot project initiative in Tehran. Journal of Urban Studies. 1(1):77-90. [Persian] [Link]
5. Aldenius M, Tsaxiri P, Lidestam H (2021). The role of environmental requirements in Swedish public procurement of bus transports. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 16(5):391-405. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15568318.2021.1879975]
6. Amer M, Daim TU, Jetter A (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures. 46:23-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003]
7. Azizi Fard A, Ebraahimzadeh I, Rafieian M (2020). An analysis of the role of government policies and market proximity on functional changes and decline of urban neighborhoods (Case study: Siroos Neighborhood of Tehran). Urban Social Geography. 7(2):139-159. [Persian] [Link]
8. Azizyan GH, Rezvani AA, Rajabi A (2022). Presenting the optimal model of Tehran urban transportation with emphasis on localized clean energy. Quarterly of Geography and Regional Planning. 12(2):284-312. [Persian] [Link]
9. Bala BK, Arshad FM, Noh KM (2017). System dynamics: Modelling and simulation. 1st Edition. Singapore: Springer. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-2045-2]
10. Ceder A (2021). Urban mobility and public transport: Future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 25(4):455-479. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/12265934.2020.1799846]
11. Chang Zh (2014). Financing new metros-The Beijing metro financing sustainability study. Transport Policy. 32:148-155. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.009]
12. Derrible S (2016). Complexity in future cities: The rise of networked infrastructure. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 21(1):68-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/12265934.2016.1233075]
13. Dorsser CV, Walker WE, Taneja P, Marchau V (2018). Improving the link between the futures field and policymaking. Futures. 104:75-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.004]
14. Ebadinia F, Ajza Shokouhi M, Rahnama MR, Kharazmi O (2017). Evaluation of low-carbon transport scenarios in Mashhad using ecological footprint approach. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards. 5(3):115-129. [Persian] [Link]
15. Ezzati Arasteh Pour F, Sohrabi R, Samadi A, Rahbar AH (2018). The achievement of sustainable transport future using scenario planning (Case study: Urban transportation of Hamedan). Journal of Transportation Research. 15(3):205-222. [Persian] [Link]
16. Gutiérrez A, Miravet D, Domènech A (2020). COVID-19 and urban public transport services: Emerging challenges and research agenda. Cities & Health. 5(1):177-180. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23748834.2020.1804291]
17. Habibian M, Kermanshah M (2015). Contribution of travel-related variables to car commuters' mode change. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 7(1):13-30. [Persian] [Link]
18. Haghighat Naeini GH, Farahani H, Fanaei S (2022). Pathology of urban regeneration programs in terms of mental health: The experts' perspective. Geographical Researches. 37(3):327-337. [Persian] [Link]
19. Hounsell N, Shrestha B, Piao J (2015). Enhancing park and ride with access control: A case study of Southampton. Transport Policy. 18(1):194-203. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.002]
20. Javadian R, Ferasat H (2017). Examining the relation of social support and security with users' social trust in public transportation. Journal of Social Order Quarterly. 22:189-212. [Persian] [Link]
21. Kaisy Ch, Chaaban FB (2013). Transitioning to the green economy: The Arab transport sector policy BRIEF. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 8(3):305-320. [Link] [DOI:10.2495/SDP-V8-N3-305-320]
22. Lempert R (2013). Scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities and robust responses. Climatic Change. 117(1):627-646. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10584-012-0574-6]
23. Li X, Preston J (2015). Assessing the financial and social costs of public transport in differing operating environments and with endogenous demand. Transportation Planning and Technology. 38(1):28-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/03081060.2014.976981]
24. Loo B, du Verle F (2017). Transit-oriented development in future cities: Towards a two-level sustainable mobility strategy. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 21(1):54-67. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/12265934.2016.1235488]
25. Manoj M, Verma A (2013). Activity based travel demand models as a tool for evaluating sustainable transportation policies. Research in Transportation Economics. 38(1):45-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.010]
26. Mansourian H, Pourahmad A, Ashouri H (2019). The analysis of the effective factors on urban blight in District 3, Region 12, Tehran City. Geography and Environmental Sustainability. 9(2):1-14. [Persian] [Link]
27. Manzoor D, Safakish MK (2011). Impact of environmental and economic policies on urban traffic behavior using hybrid top-down bottom-up approach: Case of Tehran. The Journal of Economic Modeling Research. 2(4):171-187. [Persian] [Link]
28. Martelli A (2014). Models of scenario building and planning: Facing uncertainty and complexity. 1st Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillian. [Link]
29. Milojević P, Inayatullah S (2015). Narrative foresight. Futures. 73(1):151-162. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.007]
30. Mohammadpour S, Saraffi M, Tavakolinia J (2016). Study and propose a model for travel demand management in order to achieve urban sustainable transport (Case study: Tehran). Journal of Regional Planning. 6(21):103-116. [Persian] [Link]
31. Paulsson A (2018). Making the sustainable more sustainable: Public transport and the collaborative spaces of policy translation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 20(4):419-433. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1432345]
32. Searle G, Darchen S, Huston S (2014). Positive and negative factors for transit oriented development: Case studies from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney. Urban Policy and Research. 32(4):437-457. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/08111146.2014.931280]
33. Smith P (2019). Exploring public transport sustainability with neutrosophic logic. Transportation Planning and Technology. 42(3):257-273. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/03081060.2019.1576383]
34. Suzianti A, Sabrina Gh, Ardi R, Fathia SN (2022). Designing a sustainable digital control room for public transport: A comprehensive human performance measurement model. Production & Manufacturing Research. 10(1):160-175. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/21693277.2022.2064932]
35. Sy K, Martinez ME, Rader B, White LF (2020). Socioeconomic disparities in subway use and COVID-19 outcomes in New York City. American Journal of Epidemiology. 190(7):1234-1242. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaa277]
36. Talkhabi H, Soleimani M, Saeednia A, Zanganeh A (2019). The effect of urban sprawl in emerging of transportation flows and urban air pollution in Tehran metropolitan region. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences. 19(52):77-97 [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jgs.19.52.77]
37. Tehran Municipality ICT Organization (2018). Statistical yearbook of Tehran Municipality 2017. 1st Edition. Tehran: Tehran Municipality ICT Organization. [Persian] [Link]
38. Weimer JW (2006). Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 73(4):334-361. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.005]