Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 2 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(2): 253-266 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2022/01/26 | Accepted: 2022/03/18 | Published: 2022/04/8
Received: 2022/01/26 | Accepted: 2022/03/18 | Published: 2022/04/8
How to cite this article
Shiripour M, Sasanpour F, Fassihi H, Shamai A. Assessing the Role of Spatial Structure of Metropolises in Environmental Resilience of Tabriz Metropolis by Fuzzy MABAC Method. GeoRes 2022; 37 (2) :253-266
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1291-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1291-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geography, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (903 Views)
Aims: Urban resilience has become a major problem in metropolitan areas in recent years, especially with the prevalence of corona epidemics and increasing environmental pollution. Also, the inefficiency and poor performance of the spatial structure of metropolises has caused environmental problems and problems and reduced the resilience of the urban environment; For this purpose, in this study, the role and effect of the spatial structure of Tabriz metropolis in the resilience of its urban environment have been studied.
Methodology: The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. The location of the research is the metropolis of Tabriz and its time range was in 2020 and the first half of 2021. The method of collecting research data was field and library. Data analysis methods included kernel density statistics, spatial arrangement analysis, standard deviation elliptical analysis, and the MABAC Fuzzy ranking method.
Findings: Findings indicate that the city of Tabriz in terms of criteria for determining the spatial structure is a single core with the dominance of the central part over other parts; Therefore, the environmental resilience of the urban environment was measured in this section. The results of the Fuzzy MABAC ranking also showed that the Q coefficient for commercial and industrial centers was 0.442 and 0.416, respectively, and these coefficients indicate the high impact of commercial and industrial centers on the degree of resilience of the urban environment.
Conclusion: The results showed that the highest air pollution, airborne particles, and environmental instability in the central part of the city are more than in other parts; Therefore, it can be concluded that the spatial structure of the city has a great impact on the degree of resilience of the urban environment.
Methodology: The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. The location of the research is the metropolis of Tabriz and its time range was in 2020 and the first half of 2021. The method of collecting research data was field and library. Data analysis methods included kernel density statistics, spatial arrangement analysis, standard deviation elliptical analysis, and the MABAC Fuzzy ranking method.
Findings: Findings indicate that the city of Tabriz in terms of criteria for determining the spatial structure is a single core with the dominance of the central part over other parts; Therefore, the environmental resilience of the urban environment was measured in this section. The results of the Fuzzy MABAC ranking also showed that the Q coefficient for commercial and industrial centers was 0.442 and 0.416, respectively, and these coefficients indicate the high impact of commercial and industrial centers on the degree of resilience of the urban environment.
Conclusion: The results showed that the highest air pollution, airborne particles, and environmental instability in the central part of the city are more than in other parts; Therefore, it can be concluded that the spatial structure of the city has a great impact on the degree of resilience of the urban environment.
References
1. Adger W, Safra de Campos R, Siddiqui T, Szaboova L (2020). Commentary: Inequality, precarity and sustainable ecosystems as elements of urban resilience. Urban Studies. 57(7):1588-1595. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0042098020904594]
2. Amadeh H, Ghodsi Maab M, Ahrari M (2018). Tehran's ecosystem resilience against air pollution. New Economy and Trade. 13(3):27-56. [Persian] [Link]
3. Azadi Mubaraky M, Ahmadi M (2020). Long-term variability of particulate matter (PM2.5) in Tabriz using remote sensing data. Physical Geography Research Quarterly. 52(3):467-480. [Persian] [Link]
4. Burgalassi D, Luzzat T (2015). Urban spatial structure and environmental emissions: A survey of the literature and some empirical evidence for Italian NUTS 3 regions. Cities. 49:134-48. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2015.07.008]
5. Connolly C (2020). From resilience to multi-species flourishing: (Re)imagining urban-environmental governance in Penang, Malaysia. Urban Studies. 57(7):1485-1501. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0042098018807573]
6. Cruz S, Costa J, de Sousa S, Pinho P (2013). Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning. Dordrecht: Springer. [Link]
7. Environmental Role Consulting Engineers (2016). Comprehensive plan of Tabriz metropolis. Tabriz: Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, High Council of Urban Planning and Architecture. [Persian] [Link]
8. Esmailnejad M, Eskandari Sani M, Barzaman S (2015). Evaluation and zoning of urban air pollution in Tabriz. Regional Planning. 5(19):173-186. [Persian] [Link]
9. Farzad Behtash MR, Keynejhad MA, Taghi Pirbabaei M, Asgary A (2013). Evaluation and analysis of dimensions and components of Tabriz metropolis resiliency. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA: MEMARY VA SHAHRSAZI. 18(3):33-42. [Persian] [Link]
10. Ghadami M, Divsalar A, Ranjbar Z, Gholamian Aghamahali T (2013). Strategic assessment of city spatial structure in sustainability framework (the case of the city of Sari). Journal of Urban Economics and Management. 1(3):1-16. [Persian] [Link]
11. Glaeser EL (2021). Urban Resilience. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper: 29261. [Link] [DOI:10.3386/w29261]
12. Hashemi B (2021). Analysis of the role of different functional nuclei on the spatial structure of Karaj metropolis. Geographical Research. 36(4):447-458. [Persian] [Link]
13. Hendi H, Eghbali N, Sarvar R, Pishgahi Fard Z (2020). The measurement of environmental resilience in the district 14 of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Geography Environment Preparation. 13(48):1-20. [Persian] [Link]
14. Hillier B, Vaughan L (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in Planning. 67(3):205-230. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001]
15. Honey-Rosés J, Isabelle A, Chireh, V (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions-design, perceptions and inequities. Cities & Health. 5(suppl 1):S263-S279. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074]
16. Karimi Rahnama A, Faramarzi M, Jamali S, Sattarzadeh D (2020). Presenting a transtit-oriented model considering macro urban form. Quarterly of Geography & Regional Planning. 10(2-3):719-739. [Persian] [Link]
17. Krasny ME, Tidbal KG (2009). Applying a resilience systems framework to urban environmental education. Environmental Education Research. 15(4):465-482. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13504620903003290]
18. Langemeyer J, Madrid-Lopez C, Beltran A, Mendez G (2021). Urban agriculture-A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability?. Landscape and Urban Planning. 210:104055. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055]
19. Leichenko R (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 3(3):164-168. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014]
20. Long Y (2007). The relationships between objective and subjective evaluation of the urban environment: space syntax, cognitive maps and urban legibility [Dissertation]. Raleigh, North Carolina: PROQUEST LLC. [Link]
21. Lu Y, hai, G, Zhou S, Shi Y (2020). Risk reduction through urban spatial resilience: A theoretical framework. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 27(4):921-937. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10807039.2020.1788918]
22. Mahriyar M, Rho J (2014). The compact city concept in creating resilient city and transportation system in Surabaya. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 135:41-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.323]
23. Mehdizad V (2016). Sanitation rate of Sanandaj city in environmental dimension. International Conference on Urban Economics, Tehran. Tehran: CIVILICA. [Persian] [Link]
24. Meshkini A, Azadi Ghatar S, Roknoldin Eftekhari A, Mostafavi E, Ahadnejad Reveshti M (2017). Spatial and chronological analysis of deaths from gastric cancer in Tehran. Geographical Research. 31(4):7-23. [Persian] [Link]
25. Mortazavi S, Tabibian M (2015). Investigating and explaining strategies for environmental resilience of cities with emphasis on Iranian metropolises. Seventh International Conference on Comprehensive Crisis Management. Tehran: CIVILICA. [Persian] [Link]
26. Motamedi M, Gharavi M (2020). Assessing the model of resilience of cities with fuzzy dematel approach, case study: Gorgan and Shirvan cities. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences. 20(56):329-348. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jgs.20.56.329]
27. Movahed S, Tabibian M (2018). Investigating the changes of ecological network and its role in the ecological resilience of Mashhad city. Journal of Environmental Studies. 44(2):373-394. [Persian] [Link]
28. Niazi H, Mohammadzadeh R (2010). Investigation of environmental and human effects of intra-city traffic in Tabriz. Journal of Geography and Planning. 15(34):191-216. [Persian] [Link]
29. Omidpour M, Sayahnia R, Rezaei Y (2020). The impact of urban growth and development trend on ecological network structure with resilience and landscape approach (case study of Hamedan). Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS. 12(2):19-32. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/GISJ.12.2.19]
30. Pacumar D, Cirovic G (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications. 42(6):3016-3028. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057]
31. Parivar P, Faryadi S, Yavari A, Salehi E, Harati P (2013). Developing the ecological sustainable strategies to increase urban environmental resilience: (case study: districts 1 and 3 of Tehran Municipality). Journal of Environmental Studies. 39(1):123-132. [Persian] [Link]
32. Parivar P, Sotoudeh A, Ahmadi A (2020). Resilience Thinking: concepts and applications in urban environmental management. Yazd: Yazd University Press. [Persian] [Link]
33. Piri S, Saremi H (2018). Analysis of the spatial structure of the population of Tabriz metropolitan area. Urban and Rural Management. 17(53):77-92. [Persian] [Link]
34. Sobhani B, Shokrzadeh Fard A, Piroozi A (2019). Evaluation and zoning of air pollution using AHP and ANP methods (Case study: Tabriz). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards. (29):153-169. [Persian] [Link]
35. Soleimani A, Majnouni Toutakhane A, Soleimani A R, Aftab A (2018). Assessment and Analysis of Sustainability Status in Metropolises, Case Study: All Ten Regions of Tabriz. GeoRes.; 33 (1) :140-157. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/geores.33.1.140]
36. Serra M, Pinho P (2011). Dynamics of periurban spatial structures: investigating differentiated patterns of change on Oporto's urban fringe. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 38(2):359-382. [Link] [DOI:10.1068/b36092]
37. Tucker BE, Trumbull JG, Wyss SJ (1994). Some Remark Concerning Worldwide Earthquake Hazard and Earthquake Hazard mitigation. Issues in Urban Earthquake Risk. 271. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-015-8338-1_1]
38. Viitanen J, Kingston R (2014). Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 46(4):803-819. [Link] [DOI:10.1068/a46242]