Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 1 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(1): 15-26 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/10/23 | Accepted: 2022/01/3 | Published: 2022/02/22
Received: 2021/10/23 | Accepted: 2022/01/3 | Published: 2022/02/22
How to cite this article
Ali Akbari E, Mousakazemi S, Gholami S. Physical Form Coherence from Connectivity Point of View; Case Study of Shiraz, Iran. GeoRes 2022; 37 (1) :15-26
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1235-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1235-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography & Urban Planning, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (1167 Views)
Aims: Urban development plans try to restore dynamism and vitality to urban contexts, but the lack of existing structure and modeling of previous plans has made the definition of sustainable urban form a challenge for urban planners. The purpose of this article was to explain the coherent form of Shiraz based on the concept of connectivity.
Methodology: This descriptive-analytical research was conducted by documentary and field method in 2021. This study was conducted in Shiraz and the sample size was urban and street blocks and functional zones of 11 districts of this city.
Findings: The interconnected centers of the city geometrically and functionally affect each other as long as all the effects occur between the centers in a single area. Therefore, before applying changes in the physical form of each area of Shiraz, its consequences should be considered in the affected area. These consequences are due to the position of the position in relation to the priority of influencing the influence of the boundary number of each block, influence in complex network centers and interconnected centers, irregular structure, control and promotion of construction, population and the extent of various economic and social indicators, culturally, and physically examined.
Conclusion: In the process of urban planning, changes in each region should not be considered as an independent region and the pattern of interoperability in urban development planning and management should be considered for regular organization and their effects in order to achieve Use coherence in form.
Methodology: This descriptive-analytical research was conducted by documentary and field method in 2021. This study was conducted in Shiraz and the sample size was urban and street blocks and functional zones of 11 districts of this city.
Findings: The interconnected centers of the city geometrically and functionally affect each other as long as all the effects occur between the centers in a single area. Therefore, before applying changes in the physical form of each area of Shiraz, its consequences should be considered in the affected area. These consequences are due to the position of the position in relation to the priority of influencing the influence of the boundary number of each block, influence in complex network centers and interconnected centers, irregular structure, control and promotion of construction, population and the extent of various economic and social indicators, culturally, and physically examined.
Conclusion: In the process of urban planning, changes in each region should not be considered as an independent region and the pattern of interoperability in urban development planning and management should be considered for regular organization and their effects in order to achieve Use coherence in form.
Keywords:
References
1. Abdollahi Torkamani Z, Yazdani M, Ghanbari A (2019). Analyzing the spatial structure of the city with an emphasis on spatial connectivity and connectivity metropolis of Tabriz. Research and Urban Planning. 10(37):25-40. [Persian] [Link]
2. Azizi M, Araste M (2011). Spatial evaluation of urban form with respect to construction density in Yazd. Hoviatshahr. 5(8):5-15. [Persian] [Link]
3. Bahreini Sh, Froughifar M (2015). Physical coherence in Shiraz central area; to present civil planning strategies in order to increase physical coherence based on the city identity complexity theory. Hoviatshahr. 10(28):5-18. [Persian] [Link]
4. Burgalassi D, Luzzati T (2015). Urban spatial structure and environmental emissions: A survey of the literature and some empirical evidence for Italian NUTS 3 regions. Cities. 49:134-148. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2015.07.008]
5. Chen Y (2016). Normalizing and classifying shape indexes of cities by ideas from fractals. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 154:111653 [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111653]
6. Daneshpoor SA, Roosta M (2012). City structure reading: a step to understanding city form. Journal of Iran Architecture and Urbanism. 4:45-54. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ghoraba N, Tabibian M (2017). Developing an applied model for explaining the mental structure of cognitive maps of people through spatial-morphological analysis of existing urban textures, case study: historical texture of Kerman. Bagh-e Nazar. 14(54):33-46. [Persian] [Link]
8. Giannopoulou M, Vavatsikos P, Lykostrattis A (2016). A proccess for pefining relations between urban integration and residential market prices. Journal of Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 223:153-159. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.338]
9. Guérois M, Paulus F (2002). Commune centre, agglomération, aire urbaine: quelle pertinence pour l'étude des villes? Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 212(26):1-18. [French] [Link] [DOI:10.4000/cybergeo.3491]
10. Jiang B (2013). Head/tail breaks: A new classification scheme for data with a heavy-tailed distribution. The Professional Geographer. 65(3):482-494. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00330124.2012.700499]
11. Jiang B, Liu X (2012). Scaling of geographic space from the perspective of city and field blocks and using volunteered geographic information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 26(2):215-229. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13658816.2011.575074]
12. Mohajeri N (2006). Physical sustainability in Iran traditional cities, coherence and complexity principal in civil planning- Tehran fractal structure. Environment Sciences and Technology. 10(3):121-130. [Persian] [Link]
13. Mokhtarpour M, Manteghi Fasaie A (2018). Explaining cultural-managerial factors affecting the increase of social crimes resulting from the physical-spacial development of Tehran (case of study: 19th district of Tehran). Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies. 10(3):119-135. [Persian] [Link]
14. Mokhtarzade S, Qal'e Noei M, Kheiraldin R (2018). To search city form coherence and physical structure evalyation conpetual patter and explain its principals. Bagh-e Nazar. 15(66):65-80. [Persian] [Link]
15. Movahed A, Mostafavi Sheb S, Ahmadi M (2014). To explain Saqez physical-spatial spread pattern with approach to sustainable civil form. Civil Planning Studies. 2(5):55-75. [Persian] [Link]
16. Nadimi Z, Mandegari K, Mohammadi A (2014). An analysis of center concept in architecture. Iranian Architecture. 3(5):115-129. [Persian] [Link]
17. Nazariyan A (1991). Spatial expansion of Tehran and the emergence of satellite. Geographical Research. 6(1):97-139. [Persian] [Link]
18. Nikpoor A, Lotfi S, Rezazade M (2017). Analysis of the relationship between urban form and access indicator (Case study: Babolsar city). Geography Spatial Planning. 7(3):85-106. [Persian] [Link]
19. Nikpoor A, Rezazade M, Elahitabar F (2017). Determining Mahalat form capacity based on compact city pattern, case study: Babolsar city. Sustainable City. 1(2):79-95. [Persian] [Link]
20. Poorja'far M R, Esmaelian S (2013). Seeking for standards forming civil spaces network in Iran historical textures, case study: Isfahan. Civil Management. 11(31):62-65. [Link]
21. Purevtseren M, Tsegmid B, Indra M, Sugar M (2018). The fractal geometry of urban land use: The case of Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia. Land. 7(2):67. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/land7020067]
22. Qadami M, Bahrami Y, Deylam Salahi M (2017). The Effect of Urban Physical Form on Citizen's Travel Mode (Case study: Sari city). Journal of Physical Development Planning. 2(2):45-56. [Persian] [Link]
23. Raimbault J (2019). An urban morphogenesis model capturing interactions between networks and territories. The mathematics of urban morphology. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_17]
24. Roshani P, Habibi K, Saeideh Zarabadi ZS (2017). Designing a conceptual model for integration of urban space network in district 6 of Tehran. Bagh-e Nazar. 14(48):31-42. [Persian] [Link]
25. Salingaros NA (1999). Urban space and its information field. Journal of Urban Design, 4(1):29-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13574809908724437]
26. Shafieion Z, Zamani B (2021). Evaluating the impact of the urban form objective measures on the neighborhood residents' walkability (case study: district 14 of Isfahan). Journal of Spatial Planning. 11(1):133-150. [Persian] [Link]
27. Shahinifar M (2005). Investigation about the pattern of the sustainable form of Kermanshah city using quantitative methods. Human Geography Researches. 48(2):333-348. [Persian] [Link]
28. Shakibaei Bidaruni F, Tabibian M (2018). Comparative impact assessment of physical form on social capital among residents of urban neighborhoods, case study: Qazvin. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 11(23):295-306. [Persian] [Link]
29. Sharqi A, Alimardani M, Jahan Zamin Y, Jahan Zamin S (2017). Analysis and evaluation of factors affecting the integrity of the urban fabric in public spaces in historical contexts (case study: neighborhood center Shahidghah in Ardabil). Urban Management. 47:301-316. [Link]
30. Tavalaee N (2002). Integrated urban form. Soffeh. 12(3-4). [Persian] [Link]
31. Tsai YH (2005). Quantifying urban form: compactness versus' sprawl'. Urban Studies. 42(1):141-161 [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0042098042000309748]