Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 1 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(1): 91-99 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/09/20 | Accepted: 2021/11/16 | Published: 2022/03/11
Received: 2021/09/20 | Accepted: 2021/11/16 | Published: 2022/03/11
How to cite this article
Mostofi A, Sarvari H, Hanaee T, Mahdinia M. Identifying Urban Planning Incentive from the Perspective of the Private and Public Sector for the Formation of Public-Private Partnership in Mashhad. GeoRes 2022; 37 (1) :91-99
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1212-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1212-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Urban Planning and design, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract (1273 Views)
Aims: The provision of services will not be possible by urban management alone. Therefore, cooperation between the private and public sector in form of public-private partnership is necessary. In partnership between the private sector and the public sector, common interests are very fundamental. Less researches are about urban planning incentives which is addressed to the agreed incentives of both the public and private sectors. So, this paper identifies urban planning incentives in public-private partnership in accordance with the opinions of the investor and urban management for the first time.
Methodology: The present inquiry has been done through a qualitative approach in 2020. The sampling method was non-random and these interviews were continued with 11 people until saturation was obtained. Data collection was done through semi-structured interviews with investors and municipal employees as public and private sectors. Data analysis and coding was done through sub-coding and attribute coding.
Findings: The collected data were analyzed in the form of 110 primary codes, 29 sub-codes and 5 categories such as appropriate environment, increasing users, indirect profitability, direct profitability and increasing land and building prices. Sub-coding were about flexibility, site selection and land use.
Conclusion: The results of this study show that urban planning incentives are not only limited to financial benefit and profitability, but also include factors such as public satisfaction and creating an appropriate environment.
Methodology: The present inquiry has been done through a qualitative approach in 2020. The sampling method was non-random and these interviews were continued with 11 people until saturation was obtained. Data collection was done through semi-structured interviews with investors and municipal employees as public and private sectors. Data analysis and coding was done through sub-coding and attribute coding.
Findings: The collected data were analyzed in the form of 110 primary codes, 29 sub-codes and 5 categories such as appropriate environment, increasing users, indirect profitability, direct profitability and increasing land and building prices. Sub-coding were about flexibility, site selection and land use.
Conclusion: The results of this study show that urban planning incentives are not only limited to financial benefit and profitability, but also include factors such as public satisfaction and creating an appropriate environment.
Keywords:
References
1. Adair A, Berry J, McGreal S, Deddis B, Hirst S (1999). Evaluation of investor behaviour in urban regeneration. Urban Studies. 36(12):2031-2045. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0042098992520]
2. Averkieva E (2017). Public-private partnership as incentive institution of entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Regulation. 8(1):117-130. [Link] [DOI:10.17835/2078-5429.2017.8.1.117-130]
3. Biygautane M, Neesham C, Othman Al-Yahya kh (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and infrastructure public-private partnership (PPP): Unpacking the role of social actors in implementing PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management. 37(1):192-219. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.12.005]
4. Boxmeer BV, Beckhoven EV (2005). Public-private partnership in urban regeneration: a comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs. International Journal of Housing Policy. 5(1):1-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14616710500055612]
5. Buckberg E, Kearney O, Stolleman N (2015). Expanding the market for infrastructure public-private partnerships: alternative risk and profit sharing approaches to align sponsor and investor interests. Washington: U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Economic Policy. [Link] [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2603835]
6. Carmona M (2016). Design governance: theorizing an urban design sub-field. Journal of Urban Design. 21(6):705-730. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781315748979]
7. Carmona M, Magalhães CD, Natarajan L (2017). Design Governance. New York: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781315748979]
8. Chang Zh (2013). Public-private partnerships in China: A case of the Beijing No.4 metro line. Transport Policy. 30:153-160. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.011]
9. Chirl-Ho Y (2018). A case study on public building construction method by public-private partnership in Japan. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design. 34(12):3-12. [Link]
10. De Clerck D, Demeulemeester E (2016). An ex ante bidding model to assess the incentive creation capability of a public-private partnership pipeline. International Journal of Project Management. 34(1):117-131. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.007]
11. Ditmar H, Falk B (2016). The pink zone where small is possible. London: The project for LEAN URBANISM. [Link]
12. Dupont L, Morel L, Guidat C (2015). Innovative public-private partnership to support smart city: the case of Chaire REVES. Journal of Strategy and Management. 8(3):245-265. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0027]
13. Golubchikov O (2004). Urban planning in Russia: towards the market. European Planning Studies. 12(2):229-247. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0965431042000183950]
14. Heurkens E, Hobma F (2014). Private sector-led urban development projects: comparative insights from planning practices in the Netherlands and the UK. Planning Practice & Research. 29(4):350-369. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02697459.2014.932196]
15. Hodge G, Greve C (2007). Public-private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review. 67(3):545-558. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x]
16. Hodge GA, Greve, C (2017). On public-private partnership performance: a contemporary review. Public Works Management & Policy. 22(1):55-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1087724X16657830]
17. Hoggett P (1991). A new management in the public sector?. Policy & Politics. 19(4):243-256. [Link] [DOI:10.1332/030557391782454179]
18. Huff-Rousselle M, Akuamoah-Boateng J (1998). The first private sector health insurance company in Ghana. International Journal of Health Planning Management. 13(2):165-175.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199804/06)13:2<165::AID-HPM505>3.0.CO;2-X [Link] [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199804/06)13:23.0.CO;2-X]
19. Ika Wahyuni P, Hardjomuljadi S, Sulistio H, Koespiadi (2019). Model influence risk and incentive variables on the feasibility of public-private partnership (PPP) in highway infrastructure projects. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 10(8):112-123. [Link]
20. Ilgenstein SA (2022). One for the money, two for the show: What are the actor-based incentives for public-private partnerships for innovation?. European Policy Analysis. 8(1):87-108. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/epa2.1131]
21. Lee W (2015). The formation of business improvement districts in low-income immigrant neighborhoods of Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Review. 52(6):944-972. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1078087415596241]
22. Li L (2011). The incentive role of creating cities in China. China Economic Review. 22(1):172-181. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2010.12.003]
23. Mackintosh M (1992). Partnership: Issues of policy and negotiation. Local Economy. 7(3):210-224. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02690949208726149]
24. Nyein TS, Hadikusumo BHW (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of public-private partnership in low-cost housing development in Myanmar. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction. 26(3):337-365. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JFMPC-01-2020-0003]
25. Oppio A, Torrieri F (2016). Supporting public-private partnership for economic and financial feasibility of urban development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 223:62-68. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.299]
26. Richer M, lessen K (2018). Towards business improvement districts in Denmark: Translating a neoliberal urban intervention model into the Nordic context. European urban Regional Studies. 26(2):158-170. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0969776418759156]
27. Saldana J (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Givian AL, translator. Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi Publisher. [Persian] [Link]
28. Schifnagel Avrichir A (2018). An analysis of public-private partnership contractual incentives in Brazilian citizen service centers. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration. 52(6). [Link] [DOI:10.1590/0034-761220170166]
29. Schneider A, Ingram H (1990). Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. Journal of Politics. 52(2):510-529. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2131904]
30. www.amar.org.ir (2017) [internet]. Mashhad: Deputy of Planning and Human Capital Development of Mashhad Municipality; [Unknown Cited]. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/ [Persian] [Link]
31. Ullah A (2014). Public private partnership: a tool in promoting good governance in India International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. 3(9):102-120. [Link]
32. Vitale T (2010). Regulation by incentives, regulation of the incentives in urban policies. Transnational Corporations Review. 2(2):35-45. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/19186444.2010.11658232]
33. Yang X, Zhang J, Qiping Shen G, Yan Y (2019). Incentives for green retrofits: An evolutionary game analysis on Public-Private-Partnership reconstruction of buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production. 232(20):1076-1092. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.014]
34. Zhang X (2005). Criteria for selecting the private-sector partner in public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 131(6):631-644. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(631)]