[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
:: Volume 36, Issue 3 (2021) ::
GeoRes 2021, 36(3): 263-274 Back to browse issues page
Constructive Dynamisms of Large-Scale Urban Projects by the Space Political Economy Approach; a Case Study of Mashhad Metropolis
Gh. Kazemian *1, E. Ali Akbari2, M. Taleshi2, M. Hadad Hasanabadi3
1- Department of Governmental Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran , kazemian1344@gmail.com
2- Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Geography, Graduate Center of Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (176 Views)
Aims: The development of large-scale construction projects has transformed the shape of cities towards specific objectives and based on economic and political perspectives that dominate policy-making and planning in cities. The purpose of the research was to study and analyze the spatiality of Mashhad construction mega-projects and to explain the constructive forces and dynamisms of these projects in the framework of the political economy of space approach.
Methodology: The present descriptive-analytical research was conducted in 2020 in Mashhad. Constructive dynamisms of 164 large-scale urban projects were identified and classified based on theoretical perspectives and through the Delphi technique based on the opinions of 50 elites and subject matter experts, and the model was presented. To test the five-factor model using structural equation modeling, the relationships between variables and generalization of results were discussed. Data were analyzed using SPSS26 and smartpls 3 software and confirmatory factor analysis test.
Findings: Based on the results of confirmatory factor analysis, the model had an acceptable fit with the data. At the transnational level, the Policy-Management and Programs factor with a factor-load (0.745), at the national-regional level, the institutional-organizational factor with a factor-load (0.802) and at the local level, the economic-political factor with a factor-load (0.772). They are important in the first place. The model had validity and reliability.
Conclusion: The results of research analysis based on the philosophy of creating construction mega-projects in Mashhad within the framework of five identified and consolidated factors indicate the role of drivers of policy dynamisms at the transnational level, institutional-organizational forces at the national-regional level and economic and political forces at the local level.
Keywords: Political Economy of Space , Urban Mega Project , Political Economy of Mashhad Metropolis , Confirmatory Factor Analysis ,
Full-Text [PDF 1012 kb]   (103 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Urban Planning
Received: 2020/12/24 | Accepted: 2021/03/9 | Published: 2021/09/21
* Corresponding Author Address: Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, End of Olympic Village Boulevard, West End of Hemmat Highway, Tehran, Iran
1. Afrough E (1998). Space and social inequality present a model for the spatial segregation and its consequences. Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [Persian] [Link]
2. Al Darmaki IAR (2008). Globalisation and urban development: A case study of Dubai's Jumeirah Palm island mega project [dissertation]. Southampton: University of Southampton. [Link]
3. Azad Armaki T, Sedighi Kasmaee M (2019). Production of urban space in babolsar during Qajar and Pahlavi era. Cultural Studies & Communication. 12(24):185-213. [Persian] [Link]
4. Bahraini SH (1998). Process of urban designing. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [Persian] [Link]
5. Bearfield D, Dubnick MJ (2009). All mega-projects are local? citizen participation lessons from the big dig. Journal of Public Budgeting. 21(3):393-426. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JPBAFM-21-03-2009-B003]
6. Bornstein L (2010). Mega-projects, city- building and community benefits. City, Culture and Society. 1(4):199-206. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2011.01.006]
7. Buser M (2012). The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Planning Theory. 11(3):279-298. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1473095212439693]
8. Castells M (2005). The rise of the network: The information age: Economy, society and culture. Hoboken: Wiley. [Link]
9. Carranco MM (2008). Mexico City reinvented through the Santa Fe urban megaproject. California: Berkeley. [Link]
10. Doucet B (2007). Flagship regeneration: Panacea or urban problem. EURA Conference the Vital City, 12-14 September 2007, Glasgow, Scotland. Utrecht: Utrecht University. [Link]
11. Flyvbjerg B (2002). Bringing power to planning research: one researcher's praxis story. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21(4):353-366. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0739456X0202100401]
12. Flyvbjerg B (2004). Phronetic planning research: theoretical and methodological reflections. Planning Theory & Practice. 5(3):283-306. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1464935042000250195]
13. Flyvbjerg B (2005). Policy and planning for large infrastructure projects: problems, causes, cures. World Bank Publications. No. 3781 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2278256 [Link] [DOI:10.1596/1813-9450-3781]
14. Flyvbjerg B (2007). Megaproject policy and planning: Problems, causes, cures. Aalborg: Aalborg University. [Link]
15. Flyvbjerg B (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal. 45(2):6-19. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/pmj.21409]
16. Flyvbjerg B, Bruzeliu N, Rothengatter W (2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107050891]
17. Ghalibaf MB, Ezatpanah B, Pourmosavi SM (2010). Spatial concentration and its effects on the physical extension and spatial structure of Sanandaj city. Geographic Space. 10(32):151-180. [Persian] [Link]
18. Hafeznia MR, Ghaderi Hajat M, Ahmadipour Z (2010). Indexing the components of politics and space in political geograph. Human Geography Research. (72):121-134. [Persian] [Link]
19. Harvey D (2013). The urbanization of capital. Oxford: Blackwell. [Link]
20. Hatami Nejad H, Abdi N (2007). Political economy and urban space. Political-Economic. 237-238:196-205. [Persian] [Link]
21. Imani Shamlou J, Rafeian M (2015). Power and re-definition of urban planning theory (with emphasis on political economy in oil-based economies). RAHBORD. 25(80):287-319. [Persian] [Link]
22. Imani Shamlou J, Rafeian M, Dadashpour H (2016). Urban speculation and spatial segregation (analysis of spatial evolution of Tehran metropolis in the context of oil-based economy). Geopolitics. 12(1):104-135. [Persian] [Link]
23. Jauhiainen JS (2006). Urbanization, capital and land-use in cities. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Arts. [Link]
24. Kamanroudi Kojori M, Tajuddin K, Abdi A (2010). Philosophical-conceptual explanation of the political geography of city. Geopolitical Quarterly. 6(3):9-44. [Persian] [Link]
25. Kazemian G (2004). Explaining the relationship between governance structure and urban power with space organization, trying to design a model (sample of Tehran metropolitan area) [dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian] [Link]
26. Lehrer U, Laidley J (2008). Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 32(4):786-803. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x]
27. Marrewijk AV, Clegg SR, Pitsis TS, Veenswijk M (2008). Managing public-private megaprojects: paradoxes, complexity, and project design. International Journal of Project Management. 26(6):591-600. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.007]
28. Mottaqi A, Jahanian M (2018). Situation of economic space policies with urban geopolitical approach (case study: Cities of Fars province). Quarterly of Geography. 7(2):163-173. [Persian] [Link]
29. Orueta FD, Faintsein SS (2008). The new mega-projects: Genesis and impacts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 32(4):759-767. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00829.x]
30. Pahlavan S (2013). The study of urban mega-projects effect on local development process; case study: Mashhad Almas-e Shargh Project [Dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [Link]
31. Piran P (1991). Theoretical perspectives on the sociology of the city and the urbanization of the ecological school. Political-Economic Information. 5(40):75-81. [Persian] [Link]
32. Sajadian N, Nasser M, Mohammadi A (2014). Study of economic issues in social relations from the perspective of the Quran and its impact on the development of human life. Quarterly Journal of Geography and Urban Planning Zagros. 6(21):56-41. [Persian] [Link]
33. Sarkheyli E (2016). An analysis of the socio-spatial conflicts of the super-projects of Mashhad [dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian] [Link]
34. Soltani A, Namdarian AA (2010). An investigation of forces influence on urban space formation. HOVITE SHAHR. 4(7):123-130. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kazemian G, Ali Akbari E, Taleshi M, Hadad Hasanabadi M. Constructive Dynamisms of Large-Scale Urban Projects by the Space Political Economy Approach; a Case Study of Mashhad Metropolis. GeoRes. 2021; 36 (3) :263-274
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1055-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 36, Issue 3 (2021) Back to browse issues page
تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4331