Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 33, Issue 1 (2018)
GeoRes 2018, 33(1): 26-38 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2017/12/2 | Accepted: 2018/04/4 | Published: 2018/06/18
Received: 2017/12/2 | Accepted: 2018/04/4 | Published: 2018/06/18
How to cite this article
Mahmodi Mohammad Abadi T, Ramesht M H. Different Aspects of the Fundamental Spatial Planning Pattern of Iran. GeoRes 2018; 33 (1) :26-38
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-276-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-276-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
Taiebe Mahmodi Mohammad Abadi *1, Mohammad hosain Ramesht2
1- Department of Geomorphology, Isfahan University , Isfahan, Iran , Taybeh.mahmoodi@gmail.com
2- Department of Geomorphology, Isfahan University , Isfahan, Iran, department of geography sciences and planning, university of Isfahan, Esfahan Iran
2- Department of Geomorphology, Isfahan University , Isfahan, Iran, department of geography sciences and planning, university of Isfahan, Esfahan Iran
Abstract (3788 Views)
The spatial planning rank as an interdisciplinary subject, has currently regained its status in many countries. Yet we cannot lose sight of the fact that, in certain cases, it has not achieved resounding success. The question that has faced Iranian geographers all along has been this: to what can be attributed the failure of Iran’s spatial planning programmers despite the implementation of ten such plans over a five_ year period? In response to this query, a nongovernmental institute entitled The center for an Islamic_ Iranian Model of Progress was established in 2011 by a relatively large number of Iranian scientists who set up a group of think tanks designed to analyze and present a model for the development of Iran. An example of this set is the Think Tank of Fundamental Spatial Planning, which has published the results of this research project in the form of monographs. An investigation of the documents published by the think tank in question, as well as the analysis of the views of eighteen thinkers within the field of spatial planning by phenomenology method and Using Wittgenstein's semantic network model, Wittgenstein's model suggests that Iranian researchers at the Center of Islamic-Iranian Pattern for progress have different views on what is being presented as the knowledge of the land. In this regard, the main theoretical differences can be described in three categories. Spatial planning is not simply an experimental science based on universal rules, but rather a product of cultural and geographical systems based on characteristics of various nations. Land constitutes a spatial container in which a value oriented theory takes shape, and given the value differences between human societies, different spatial frameworks emerge. Thus, the values of Islam will form another kind of space that is not possible in the cultural system of Etna. Spatial identity is a factor overlooked in the science of spatial planning, which is emphasized in the fundamental arrangement. This factor ensures the development of creativity and the recognition of social configuration in Iranian societies.
References
1. Aden, j., Morgan, R. (2001), Regional Planning, A Comprehensive View, Leonard Hill Books.
2. Arami, H. (2016), Operating History and Experience in land Use Analysis, Phonographic Series of Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress, Progress Pub.(in Persian)
3. Bohm, K. (2002), Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. Stockholm Nordregio (Nordregio Report 2002:8).
4. Dilthey, W. (1991), Introduction to the Human Sciences, Edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel Frithjof Rodi Princeton University Pub.
5. Ebrahimi, R. (2016), Critical Analysis and Pathology Spatial Planning in Iran, Monographic Series of Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress, Tehran, Olgoe Pishraft Pub.(in Persian)
6. ESPON (2013), Regions and Cities in the Global Economy. Luxembourg European Spatial Planning Observation Network – Study Program European Spatial Planning (ESPON).
7. European Commission (1997), Compendium of European Planning Systems. Regional Development Studies Report 28, Luxembourg Office for Official of the European Communities Pub.
8. Fairclough, N. (2010), Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd Edition. London, Longman.
9. Farajzadeh, M. (2016), Analyze and Explain the Basics of the Theory and Methodology of Conventional Land Use, Monographic Series of Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress, Olgoe Pishraft Pub. ( in Persian).
10. Foucault, M. (1986), Foucault Reader (ed. P. Rabinow), London, Penguin Books.
11. Ghourchian, N.G, Mina, J. A., (2006), From Land Preparation to Curriculum, Tehran, Farashenakhti Andishe Pub (in Persian)
12. Hansen, N., Higgins, B., Donald J, S. (1990), Regional Policy in a Changing World, Springer Science Business Media. Business Economics.
13. Hansen, N.M. (1968), French Regional Planning. Edinburgh Indiau University Pub.
14. Henry, W. (2002), Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm Possibility, Leonard Hill Books.
15. Iman, M.T., (2014), Qualitative Research Methodology, Second Edition, Qom, Institute of Science Pub( in Persian).
16. Koresawa, A., Konvitz, J. (2001), Towards a New Role for Spatial Planning in OECD. Paris OECD Service Pub.
17. Lacaze, J.P. (1995), Introduction à la planification Urbaine, Editeur (s) Presses des Ponts.
18. Mayers, N. (1994), The Cairo Crunch, People the Plant, Springer Verlage, New York.
19. Miller, G.F. (2001), Environmental Resource Management, Wadworth Pub. CO.
20. Misra, R. P. (1978), Regional Planning, Concept-Techniques-Policies and Case Studies Centre for Gandhian studies peace research: Concept Company New Delhi Pub.
21. Misra, R.P. (1978), Regional Planning in Iran Problems and Prospects. New Delhi Vikas House Pub.
22. Mitchel, G. (2003), A Firm with a Philosophy WWW.AVG.Siliconvalley.com.
23. Nadin, V. (2000), Spatial Planning and Spatial Development in Europe – Parallel or Converging Track?, Edited O. Sykes, London European Council of Town Planners Conference.
24. Needham, B. (1988), Continuity and Change in Dutch planning Theory, in Neth. J. of Housing and Environmental Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 89-106.
25. Plato, T.H, John, J.L. (2011), Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, Zibakalam, Honest, Five Speech on Government, First Edition, Rozane Pub( in Persian).
26. Rahdan Monfared, M. (2016), Geographic Device of Iran, Monographic Series of Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress, Tehran, Olgoe Pishraft Pub (in Persian).
27. Sadqany S.M. (2016), Analysis, Operational Background and Experiences (Programs) Preparation in Selected Countries, Monographic Series of Islamic-Iranian Model of Progress, Progress Pub (in Persian).
28. Shakouie, H. (2006), The Philosophy of Environmental and Geographical Schools, Tehran, Gita Pub (in Persian).
29. Stead, D., Geerlings, H, Meijers, E. (2004), Policy Integration in Practice the Integration of land-use Planning, Transport and Environmental Policy- Making in Denmark, England and Germany, Delft University Pub.
30. Stead, D., Nadin, V. (2008), Spatial Planning Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition.
31. Vahidi, P. (1994), Land Use Planning: A Guide for Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Journal of Research and Planning in Education Ai, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp. 23-45 (in Persian).
32. Vasilevska, L, Milanka, V. (2009), Strategic Planning as a Regional Development Policy Mechanism: European Context, Spatium International Review 21, pp. 19-26.
33. Whiston Spirn, A. (1998), The Language of Landscape Yale University Press New Haven and London.
34. Whorf, B. L. (1952), Collected Papers on Metalinguistic Washington Foreign Institute, Department of State.
35. Whorf, B. L. (1956), Thought and Reality Selected Writing of B.L. John Carroll, Editor, NewYork John Wiley Song.
36. William, R. H. (1996), European :union: Spatial Policy and Planning, London Paul.