Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 34, Issue 3 (2019)
GeoRes 2019, 34(3): 303-312 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2018/12/24 | Accepted: 2019/07/20 | Published: 2019/09/7
Received: 2018/12/24 | Accepted: 2019/07/20 | Published: 2019/09/7
How to cite this article
Haghparast F, Asefi M, Abizadeh E. Effect of the Place Identity Components on Place Attachment; Study of the Tabriz Historic Bazaar. GeoRes 2019; 34 (3) :303-312
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-674-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-674-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran , f.haghparast@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran, Tabriz Islamic Art University
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran, Tabriz Islamic Art University
Abstract (5694 Views)
Aims & Backgrounds: Iranian historic bazaars are the dynamic hotspots of the cities that have a vital role in shaping a sense of place attachment. Among these, Tabriz Historic Bazaar with its unique characteristics is very important. The present study aims at determining the place identity components and their effects on the place attachment among business owners at Tabriz Historic Bazaar.
Methodology: The present correlational study was conducted among business owners at Tabriz Historic Bazaar in 2018 and 374 people were selected randomly for the research. For data collection, questionnaire with 36 components in 6 dimensions were used. Data analysis was carried out using Spearman Correlation and Multiple Regression tests.
Findings: Results demonstrated that the coefficient of the most important place identity components with place attachment was significant at p<0.01 and criteria of memorability, satisfaction as well as introduction and identification had maximum coefficient with place attachment with the coefficients of 0.541, 0.480 and 0.412, respectively. Components of memorability with the beta coefficient of 0.314, satisfaction with the beta coefficient of 0.241 as well as introduction and identification with the beta coefficient of 0.140 had respectively the highest regression effects on the place attachment.
Conclusion: Considering the role of place identity components and the extent of their influence on the sense of place attachment along with the efforts to preserve them in Tabriz Bazaar would help the survival of this valuable architectural heritage, while the quality of Bazaar will be enhanced as well.
Methodology: The present correlational study was conducted among business owners at Tabriz Historic Bazaar in 2018 and 374 people were selected randomly for the research. For data collection, questionnaire with 36 components in 6 dimensions were used. Data analysis was carried out using Spearman Correlation and Multiple Regression tests.
Findings: Results demonstrated that the coefficient of the most important place identity components with place attachment was significant at p<0.01 and criteria of memorability, satisfaction as well as introduction and identification had maximum coefficient with place attachment with the coefficients of 0.541, 0.480 and 0.412, respectively. Components of memorability with the beta coefficient of 0.314, satisfaction with the beta coefficient of 0.241 as well as introduction and identification with the beta coefficient of 0.140 had respectively the highest regression effects on the place attachment.
Conclusion: Considering the role of place identity components and the extent of their influence on the sense of place attachment along with the efforts to preserve them in Tabriz Bazaar would help the survival of this valuable architectural heritage, while the quality of Bazaar will be enhanced as well.
References
1. Abasi Z, Habib F, Mokhtabad Amraei M (2015). An analysis of environmental concepts affecting the meaning of component in the traditional Iranian market, case study: Comparative comparison of Kashan traditional market and safavid commercial complex of Kashan. Urban Management Quarterly. 14(40):159-176. [Persian]
2. Ahmadi F, Aghalatifi A, Afshar A (2014). Factors influencing a sense of belonging in the regeneration of noghan neighborhood in the residential fabric near the Imam Reza Shrine. Journal of the Urban Development and Organization Haft Shahr. 4(47-48):70-84. [Persian]
3. Arbab P, Azizi MM, Zebardast ES (2016). Explanation of the key criteria of the process of Place-Identity formation in new urban development. Fine Arts Journal. 20(4):5-20. [Persian]
4. Low S, Altman I (1992). Place attachment. In: Altman I, Low SM, editors. Place Attachment. human behavior and environment (advances in theory and research), (Vol 12). Boston, MA: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_1 [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_8]
5. Canter D (1977). The psychology of place (Vol 1). 1st ed. London: The Architectural Press Ltd.
6. Droseltis O, Vignoles V (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30(1):23-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.006]
7. Falahat MS (2006). Concept of sense of place and its constituent factors. Fine Arts Journal. 1(26):57-66. [Persian]
8. Giddens A (1991). Modernity and self - Identity: Self and society in the late modern age (Vol 1). 1st ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9. Gustafson P (2001). Meaning of place: Very day experience and theorethical conceptualization. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 21(1):5-16 [DOI:10.1006/jevp.2000.0185]
10. Habibi D, Habibi D, Kasalaei A, Gorjipoor F, Tavakoli M (2018). Explaining the sense of belonging to place and identity in urban spaces with an emphasis on traditional markets. Architecture. 1(3):1-8. [Persian]
11. Habibi H (2014). Tabriz Grand Bazaar. 1st ed. Tehran: Bonyad-e Iran Shenasi. [Persian]
12. Heidari AA, Motalebi G, Negin Taji F (2014). Analysis of the physical sense of place in the traditional houses and modern residential apartments. Fine Arts Journal. 19(3):75-86. [Persian]
13. ICHHTO (2009). Executive summary Tabriz historical bazaar complex. 1st ed. Geneve: UNESCO.
14. Javan Foruzandeh A, Motallebi G (2011). The concept of place attachment and its elements. HOVIATSHAHR. 5(8):27-37. [Persian]
15. Kalali P, Modiri A (2012). Explanation of the role of meaning component in the process of creating the sense of place. Fine Arts Journal. 17(2):43-52. [Persian]
16. Kashi H, Bonyadi N (2013). Stating the model of identity of place-sense of place and surveying its constituents case study: Pedestrian passage of Shahre Rey. Fine Arts Journal. 18(3):43-52. [Persian]
17. Mohammad Moradi A, Bahmani Oskooei F (2010). Traditional market: Crisising contemporary urbanism. Designer Quarterly. (2):131-138. [Persian]
18. Navari N, Khalilzade S, Fakhari Tehrani F (2008). Tabriz Markets Bridge. Sofeh Journal. 46(17):101-108. [Persian]
19. Proshansky H (1978).The city and self-Identity. Environment and Behavior. 10(2):147-169. [DOI:10.1177/0013916578102002]
20. Proshansky H, Fabian K, Kaminoff R (1983). Place-Identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 3(1):57-83. [DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8]
21. Relph E (2008). Place and placelessness. London: Sage; pp. 43-51.
22. Shamai S (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum. 22(3):347-358. [DOI:10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-K]
23. Soini K, Vaarala H, Pouta E (2012). Residents' sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural-urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104(1):124-134. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002]
24. Steele F (1981). The sense of place. 1st ed. Boston, Mass: CBI Publishing Company.
25. Tan S, Tan S, Kok Y, Choon Sh (2018). Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage-The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management. 67:376-387. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012]
26. Tavakolianferdosieh M, Esmaeelpuor N, Noghsanmohammadi M (2016). Redesigning bazaar based on its collective memories formation and retention case study: Bazaar Khan, city of Yazd. Bagh-e Nazar. 13(39):45-56. [Persian]
27. Tuan Y (1974). Classics in human geography revisited: Topophilia. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 18(3):355-359. [DOI:10.1177/030913259401800305]
28. Zangiabadi A, Alizadeh J, Ranjbarnia B (2012). Strategic planning, to organize traditional Iranian markets a case study: The traditional market of Tabriz. Journal of Islamic Iranian Studies. 2(7):13-26. [Persian]