Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 34, Issue 1 (2019)
GeoRes 2019, 34(1): 21-27 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2018/04/21 | Accepted: 2019/02/14 | Published: 2019/03/17
Received: 2018/04/21 | Accepted: 2019/02/14 | Published: 2019/03/17
How to cite this article
Sarvari H. Prioritizing the Effective Urban Space Qualities in Providing Investors Expectations, Using Delphi Technique. Case study: Central District of Mashhad City. GeoRes 2019; 34 (1) :21-27
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-431-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-431-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
Hadi Sarvari *
Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran , sarvari_hadi@mshdiau.ac.ir
Abstract (3771 Views)
Background and Amis: The city-wide competition economy is causing the municipality to seek to attract private sector investment. But investors are looking for economic assurance for investment, and urban space qualities are important to them. Meanwhile, urban designers have different justifications for their economic impact in the process of providing qualities of urban space. The absence of categorized classifications of urban space qualities, based on its impact on economic metrics to direct urban space design methods, has created a challenge to attract investors’ attention.
Therefore, urban designers should fulfill the economic justification and local identity with utilizing quality classification. The purpose of this paper is to prioritize the qualities of urban space that is effective in providing expectations of investors based on the views of urban designers. By prioritizing urban designers in addition to providing effective qualities, they can provide economic justification for investment. Since central district of Mashhad city has transnational tourism and economic attractiveness for private sectors, it has been selected as a case study for this paper. Delphi technique has been used to prioritize urban space qualities and to build a consensus between urban designers.
Methodology: In order to study this research, 12 effective qualities in urban space design were selected. Then, the degree of importance of urban space quality were calculated.
Conclusion: The findings represent a high score for functional dimensional quality. Finally, the results show that the first-class qualities provide the most investor expectations.
Therefore, urban designers should fulfill the economic justification and local identity with utilizing quality classification. The purpose of this paper is to prioritize the qualities of urban space that is effective in providing expectations of investors based on the views of urban designers. By prioritizing urban designers in addition to providing effective qualities, they can provide economic justification for investment. Since central district of Mashhad city has transnational tourism and economic attractiveness for private sectors, it has been selected as a case study for this paper. Delphi technique has been used to prioritize urban space qualities and to build a consensus between urban designers.
Methodology: In order to study this research, 12 effective qualities in urban space design were selected. Then, the degree of importance of urban space quality were calculated.
Conclusion: The findings represent a high score for functional dimensional quality. Finally, the results show that the first-class qualities provide the most investor expectations.
Keywords:
References
1. Carmona M, De Magalhaes C, Edwards M (2002). Stakeholder views on value and urban design. Urban Design. 7(2):145-169. [DOI:10.1080/1357480022000012212]
2. Carmona M, Sieh L (2004). Measuring quality in planning -Managing the performance process, London & New York: Routledge Publication; pp. 51-52 [DOI:10.4324/9780203563311]
3. Carmona M, De Magalhaes C (2006). Innovations in the management of public space: Reshaping and refocusing governance. Planning Theory & Practice. 7(3):52-61. [DOI:10.1080/14649350600841461]
4. Carmona M, De Magalhaes C, Hammond L (2008). Public space the management dimension. London: Routledge Publication. p. 20. [DOI:10.4324/9780203927229]
5. Carmona M, Teasdale S (2015). Urban design reader, Zekavat K, Farshad F, Translators. Tehran: Azarakhs publication. p. 560. [Persian]
6. Carmona M (2017). The formal and informal tools of design governance. Urban design. 22(1):1-36. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2016.1234338]
7. Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM (1992). Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 230.
8. Clemente O, Ewing R (2005). Measuring urban design qualities an illustrated field manual, prepared for the Active Living Research Program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Maryland: University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
9. Golkar K (2000). Urban design qualities. Sofe. 11(32):38-65. [Persian]
10. Madanipour A (1997). Ambiguities of urban design. Liverpool University Press online. 63(3):363-375. [DOI:10.3828/tpr.68.3.2365658h658v0157]
11. Nase L, Berry J, Adair A (2015). Urban design quality and real state value. Urban Design. 20(5):563-581. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1071657]
12. Rowley A (1998), Private-property decision makers and the quality of urban design. Urban Design. 3(2):151-172. [DOI:10.1080/13574809808724423]
13. Sadeghi S, sobhkhiz zenori Sh (2015). The effective factors on private sector cooperation as an approach to finance sustainable recourses of municipality projects. Urban Economics and Management. 3(11):153-167. [Persian]
14. Sheppard M (2015). Essentials of urban design. CSIRO Publication. p. 312. [DOI:10.1071/9780643108776]
15. Strenberg E (2000). An integrative theory of urban design. American Planning Association . 63(3):265-278. [DOI:10.1080/01944360008976106]
16. Syms P (2002). Land, Development and Design. Manchester: Willey-Blackwell Publication. [DOI:10.1002/9780470690710]
17. Tibbalds, F (1992). Making people-friendly towns. First edition. London: Taylor and Francis Publication. p. 218. [DOI:10.4324/9780203469521_chapter_7]