Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 33, Issue 3 (2018)
GeoRes 2018, 33(3): 8-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2017/12/15 | Accepted: 2018/09/21 | Published: 2018/12/19
Received: 2017/12/15 | Accepted: 2018/09/21 | Published: 2018/12/19
How to cite this article
Hadipour M, Hafeznia M R. Determining the Behavioral Pattern of Security Reinforcement in the Islamic Republic of Iran by VIKOR Model. GeoRes 2018; 33 (3) :8-23
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-284-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-284-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
Meysam Hadipour *1, Mohammad Reza Hafeznia2
1- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran , meysamhadipoor54@yahoo.com
2- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (4007 Views)
Introduction and Background Countries partake of different behavioral patterns to provide and reinforce their national security. One of the important issues regarding his type of security is the determination of a security pattern for the public, national, regional, international levels. This pattern stems
from various factors, which, not only do they differ for different countries, but also their importance & influence on behavioral patterns of security reinforcement differ.
Aims therefor, a long side prioritizing these patterns, it is important to take into considera-tion their importance and weight.
Methodology The present research endeavors to analyze and determine the behavioral pattern for security reinforcement in the Islamic Republic of Iran, by using one of the various of multi-attribute decision making methods.
Conclusion The results of the research suggest a multi-faceted pattern (collective security) as the most appropriate pattern for security reinforcement in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
from various factors, which, not only do they differ for different countries, but also their importance & influence on behavioral patterns of security reinforcement differ.
Aims therefor, a long side prioritizing these patterns, it is important to take into considera-tion their importance and weight.
Methodology The present research endeavors to analyze and determine the behavioral pattern for security reinforcement in the Islamic Republic of Iran, by using one of the various of multi-attribute decision making methods.
Conclusion The results of the research suggest a multi-faceted pattern (collective security) as the most appropriate pattern for security reinforcement in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Keywords:
References
1. Adel, A., & Rajabzadeh, A. (2012). Applied Decision Making, MADM Approach (Fifth ed.). Tehran: Danesh. (Persian)
2. Amanpour, S., & Mavedat, E. (2015). Classification and assessment of the spatial the range of healthy sustainable urban development approach using techniques Entropy-VIKOR, TOPSIS and GIS (Case study of Yazd province). Social Welfare, 15(58), 63-90. (Persian)
3. Asgari, M. (2003). Regionalism and regional security paradigm. Political and Economic Information Magazine, 17(7-8), 54-63. (Persian)
4. Assarian Nejad, H. (2012). Interview at National Defense University, Tehran. (Persian)
5. Ataei, M. (2010). Multi-criteria Decision Making. Shahrood: Shahrood University Publication. (Persian)
6. Boozan, B. (1999). People, governments and panic, (Research Institute of Strategic Studies, Trans.). Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. (Persian)
7. Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Materials & Design, 30(10), 4043-4053. [DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.016]
8. Dodds, K. (2000). Geopolitics in a changing world. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
9. Dolby, S. (2004). Future resources and extreme warfare (F. Baheri, Trans.). Tehran: Dialogue Monthly. (Persian)
10. Eftekhari, A. (2000). National security police dimensions, articles on national security and the role of police (First ed.). Tehran: Naja. (Persian)
11. Eftekhary, A. A. (2005). The fundamental stages of thought in national security studies. Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. (Persian)
12. Elliot, J., & Reginald, R. (1988). The arms control,disarmament, and military security dictionary (First ed.). California: Abc-Clio, inc.
13. Fazli, S., Teimouri, A., & Khodaee, H. (2011). Evaluation of the quality of public sector services by the combined method (VIKOR) and fuzzy approach. Improvement Management Studies, 21(65), 73-103. (Persian)
14. Hafeznia, M. (2012). Interview at Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. (Persian)
15. Hafeznia, M. R. (2006). Geopolitical Principles and Concepts. Mashhad: Papoli Publications. (Persian)
16. Haftendorn, H., & Tayeb, A. (1992). Security dilemma: Theorizing and creating rules for international security. Foreign Policy Magazine, 6(4). (Persian)
17. Jalinousi, A. (2006). Strategic developments in the persian Gulf, a political security approach. Political Knowledge Quarterly, 2(3), 39-58. (Persian)
18. Karimi, F., & Ahmadvand, M. (2013). Modeling the developmental levels of rural areas in the central part of Boyerahmad city. Journal of Applied Geographical Sciences, 14(33), 91 -111. (Persian)
19. Khairgo, M., Nourbakhsh, I., & Mohammadi, A. (2016). Assessment and prioritization of the quality dimensions of educational services based on the servoal model using the AHP-VIKOR combined approach (case study: Imam Ali's Officer University). Military Management Quarterly, 16(61), 113-134. (Persian)
20. Kupchan, C. A., & Kupchan, C. A. (1995). The promise of collective security. International Security, 20(1), 52-61. [DOI:10.2307/2539215]
21. Luciani, G. (1988). The economic content of security. Journal of Public Policy, 8(2), 151-173. [DOI:10.1017/S0143814X00006966]
22. Mandel, R. (2008). The changing face of national security: a conceptual analysis (Strategic Studies Institute, Trans.). Tehran: Strategic Studies Institute. (Persian)
23. Maoz, Z. (2000). Regional security (D. Olamaei, Trans.). Tehran: Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, School of Command, Higher War. (Persian)
24. Marsh, D., & Stoker, J. (2005). Methodology and Theory in Political Science (A. M. Hajiyosofi, Trans.). Tehran: Strategic Studies Institute. (Persian)
25. Mckinlay, R., Robert, D., & Little, R. (2001). Global problems and world order (A. Eftekhari, Trans.). Tehran: Strategic Studies Institute. (Persian)
26. Moradian, M. (2009). Threats and Security (Definitions and Concepts). Tehran: Shahid Sepahbod Sayyad Shirazi Educational and Research Center. (Persian)
27. Morz, j. (1980). Beyond security. New York: International Peace Academy.
28. Moshirzadeh, H., & Ebrahimi, N. (2010). The evolution of concepts in international relations. Tehran: Strategic Studies Institute. (Persian)
29. Nikpour, A., Malekshahi, G., & Razqi, F. (2015). Evaluation of sustainable urban development indicators with emphasis on justice in distribution of services. Journal of Urban Planning and Research, 6(22), 125 -138. (Persian)
30. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455. [DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1] [DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1]
31. Ranjbar, M. (1999). Security considerations in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (First ed.). Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies. (Persian)
32. Rao, R. V. (2008). A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Materials & Design, 29(10), 1949-1954. [DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.019] [DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.019]
33. Rosandel, J. (2009). National Security and International System. Tehran: Samt Publication.
34. Soleimani, M., Bouzar-Majri, K., Javan, J., & Anabestani, A. A. (2015). Explaining the factors affecting the instability of rural settlements in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Rural Planning and Research, 4(3), 21 -38. (Persian)
35. Tajik, M. R. (1998). Regulation in dispersion, a discussion on Iran's national security. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 1(2), 117-128. (Persian)
36. Tajik, M. R. (2002). Introduction to National Security Strategies (Vol. I). Tehran: Golban. (Persian)
37. Vaezi, M., & Dadandish, P. (2011). The necessity of establishing regional security arrangements in the caucasus: A new approach. Quarterly Journal of Central and Caucasus Studies, 74, 169-202. (Persian)
38. Wolfers, A. (1962). National security an ambiguous symbol. Maryland, USA: John Hopkins University Press.
39. Zarei, Y., Mahdavi Hajilouei, M., Stelaji, A., & Sarver, R. (2015). Analysis and categorization of development levels in rural areas of dashti country of Iran with emphasis on fuzzy approach. Journal of Village and Development, 19(1), 95-114. (Persian)