Persian
Volume 40, Issue 1 (2025)                   GeoRes 2025, 40(1): 1001-1024 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML

History

How to cite this article
Hoseini lahori M, Mansori M, Shafipour Yourdshahi P. Evaluating the Relationship Between Urban Space Quality and Different Levels of sense of Place (Case Study: District 22, Tehran). GeoRes 2025; 40 (1) :1001-1024
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1707-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Islamic azad University of Shahr Qods, Shar-e-Qods, Iran
2- Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, National University of Skills (NUS), Tehran, Iran , m-mansori@tvu.ac.ir
3- Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran.
Abstract   (63 Views)
Aims & Backgrounds: The purpose of this research is to identify and evaluate the influential components of urban spaces in increasing the sense of belonging to the place and to provide strategies to improve the sense of belonging in the public spaces of District 22.
Methodology: The current research is applied in terms of its research objective and analytical-descriptive in nature. The research strategy is inductive. Research data was collected using a questionnaire. The statistical population is residents of the 22nd district. The sample size using the Cochran formula is 387 samples.
Findings: According to the results of the model in Amos, the relationship between the quality of public space and the sense of belonging is 0.824, indicating a very strong correlation between these two variables. This result indicates that the higher the quality of a public space, the greater the possibility of creating a sense of belonging to that space for users than other spaces. In examining the relationship between the sense of belonging and the components of public space quality, the strongest relationship is with the social component of public spaces. The most important result of this research is the weakness of the attachment component to place.
Conclusion: According to the results, attachment to place has a weak relationship with physical, social, and semantic components. In fact, in the public spaces of Area 22, a deep emotional connection between the individual and the place has not been established, and the public spaces lack meaning for the users.
Keywords: