Persian
Volume 39, Issue 4 (2024)                   GeoRes 2024, 39(4): 399-407 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Fakhari F, Motevali S, Azimi Amoli J, Janbaz Ghobadi G. Urban Riverbank Land Use Management for Sustainable Tourism Development in Rivers of Noor City. GeoRes 2024; 39 (4) :399-407
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1663-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Geography & Urban Planning, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Noor, Iran
2- Department of Geography, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Noor, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Islamic Azad University, Central Building of the University, Noor, at the beginning of the Noor-Chamestan Road, Noor, Iran. Postal Code: 4641859557 (sadr_m1970@yahoo.com)
Full-Text (HTML)   (27 Views)
Background
In many cities across Iran, urban rivers are perceived as threats to the city rather than being recognized as valuable natural and social assets. Consequently, they are controlled through structural interventions. This neglect leads to the degradation of urban environmental quality, the emergence of ecological problems, and the loss of recreational and tourism potentials.
Previous Studies
In most Iranian cities, rivers are managed through measures such as wall construction and concrete lining, rather than being regarded as natural and social opportunities. As a result, they often turn into abandoned and polluted spaces that contribute to environmental, social, and economic issues [Hatami & Zakerhaghighi, 2017]. In contrast, in many parts of the world, riverbanks are recognized as dynamic public spaces and places for social interaction and mental relaxation [Khoshghadam & Razaghi Asl, 2017]. Furthermore, studies on sustainable tourism highlight the importance of integrating environmental principles, community participation, and the sustainable use of natural resources [Kiani Salmi & Afzali, 2020]. From an ecological perspective, with the growth of urbanization and increased pressure on natural resources, attention to the concept of urban ecological networks has been emphasized as a strategy for preserving biodiversity, reducing the fragmentation of natural habitats, and enhancing the ecological functions of urban spaces [Saberi Nahrafrouzani & Mansouri, 2021; Hemmati & Amiri, 2016; Ebrahimi Dehkordi, 2020]. These approaches not only improve the aesthetic qualities of urban spaces but also pave the way for achieving sustainable development [Daneshpour & Parevar, 2014; Divsalar et al., 2016].
Aim(s)
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of riverfront land use management criteria in the city of Nour in the year 2024.
Research Type
This research was of a descriptive-analytical nature, and in order to achieve the main objective of the study, statistical methods were employed to examine and evaluate the collected data. This quantitative approach enabled the researcher to assess and analyze the effects of various riverfront land use management criteria with greater precision.
Research Society, Place, and Time
The statistical population of this study consisted of citizens and experts in the fields of urban management and tourism in the city of Nour in the year 2024.
Sampling Method and Number
In this study, the statistical population included citizens and experts in the fields of urban management and tourism in the city of Nour. The sampling method used was simple random sampling, selected to ensure accurate representation of the entire population. The sample size was determined using Cochran’s formula, resulting in the selection of 379 individuals as the study sample. Additionally, to assess the validity of the questionnaire, purposive sampling was employed to select 12 specialists and academics in relevant fields.
Used Devices & Materials
Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire designed based on the parameters and indicators identified in the theoretical framework and literature review. The questionnaire included sections for evaluating criteria such as recreational facilities, infrastructure, economic aspects, environmental factors, legal support, security, and public participation. A five-point Likert scale was used to measure respondents’ opinions. For data analysis, SPSS software version 24 was utilized, and statistical tests such as one-sample t-test and Friedman test were employed. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to assess the reliability of the data collection instrument.
Findings by Text
The criteria of "recreational and welfare facilities," "economic aspects," "environmental factors," "institutional and legal support," and "public participation" had mean values lower than the theoretical median (equal to 3), and the one-sample t-test indicated a statistically significant weakness in these areas (Table 1). In contrast, the criteria of "physical structure and infrastructure" and "security and protection" had mean values above the theoretical average and were evaluated as statistically significant and positive, suggesting their constructive role in promoting sustainable tourism development (Table 1, Figure 1).

Table 1. Impact of Riverfront Land Use Management Criteria in Nour City on Sustainable Tourism Development



Figure 1. The Impact of Riverfront Land Use Management in Nour City on Sustainable Tourism Development

Table 2 reiterated the average values of the criteria, again showing that physical and security-related aspects were in a relatively better condition compared to other dimensions. Overall, the total mean score for the parameter "land use management" was 2.808, which was below the theoretical threshold, indicating that the current state of riverfront land uses in the city of Nour was considered unfavorable for sustainable tourism development.

Table 2. Status of Riverfront Land Uses in Nour City for Sustainable Tourism Development


According to the Friedman test, the economic criterion was ranked as the highest priority in land use management, followed by the physical criterion.
The specific effects of two key interventions of "development of recreational and sports land uses" and "construction and widening of streets" were analyzed (Table 3).  "Physical structure and infrastructure," with a mean of 3.106 and a high level of significance, had a positive impact on sustainable tourism development. In contrast, "recreational and welfare facilities," with a mean of 2.615 and a negative t-value, reflected a weaker status.

Table 3. Impact of the Creation and Development of Recreational and Sports Land Uses, and the Construction and Widening of Riverfront Streets on Riverfront Land Use Management in Nour City for Sustainable Tourism Development


Finally, a conceptual model for riverfront land use management aimed at sustainable tourism development was prepared (Figure 2). This model encompasses natural, economic, socio-cultural, and managerial dimensions and emphasizes the integration of economic utilization with the preservation of natural resources and local community participation.


Figure 2) Conceptual modeling of riverbank land-use organization in the city of Nour for sustainable tourism development

Main Comparisons to Similar Studies
In comparison with previous studies, the findings of this research align with the studies by Abuharris & Ruddock (2005) and Keshvarparast & Parsaee (2015), indicating that weaknesses in institutional infrastructure, the environment, and public participation are significant barriers to sustainable tourism development. Similarly, GSTC (2019) and Jahantighmand et al. (2023) emphasize the importance of strong infrastructure, security, and environmental awareness prior to land re-use. Moreover, the alignment of the results of this study with the research of Khan et al. (2020), Vasilakakis et al. (2023), and Kameri-Mbote et al. (2021) shows that economic and physical criteria are two main components in sustainable tourism development. International studies such as UN Tourism (2023) and Farhadi Uonaki & Khoshkhoo (2022) also emphasize the need for a balanced approach between economic, social, and environmental dimensions, a recommendation that this study also suggests for the city of Nour. This alignment indicates that the findings of the present research are consistent with global principles of sustainable tourism development.
Suggestions
Future research on the management of urban riverbank land uses could focus on topics such as environmental and natural resource conservation, enhancing the tourist experience, strengthening local economic development, preserving indigenous culture and heritage, and assessing social and cultural impacts. These studies are suggested with the aim of providing solutions for sustainable tourism development, increasing tourist satisfaction, creating job opportunities, reducing poverty, and preserving the cultural identity of riverine areas.

Conclusion
The land use of urban riverbanks in the city of Nour has significant weaknesses in terms of recreational and economic facilities, environmental sustainability, institutional support, and public participation, all of which have been evaluated as below the desired level. In contrast, infrastructure and security measures have been effective and have played a positive role in the development of sustainable tourism.

Acknowledgments: Nothing to declare.
Ethical Permission: Nothing to declare.
Conflict of Interest: This article is derived from the first author's dissertation. There is no conflict of interest regarding the writing and publication of this article.
Author Contributions: Fakhari F (First Author), Introduction Writer/Discussion Writer/Methodologist/Statistical analyst (40%); Motevali S (Second Author), Introduction writer/Discussion Writer (20%); Azimi Amoli J (Third Author), Introduction Writer/Discussion Writer (20%); Janbaz Ghobadi Gh (Fourth Author), Introduction Writer/Discussion Writer (20%)
Funding: Nothing to declare.
Keywords:

References
1. Abuharris MAT, Ruddock L (2005). Land-use planning and sustainable tourism development in Libya. Proceedings of the 21st Association of Researchers in Construction Management Annual Conference. London: ARCOM. p. 665-674. [Link]
2. Ahmadi F, Bemanian M, Ansari M (2018). An introduction to natural landscape restoration method based on landscape ecology approach. BAGH-E-NAZAR. 14(56):5-16. [Persian] [Link]
3. Daneshpour A, Parevar P (2014). Improving the ecological and aesthetic functions of urban river valley landscapes by application of analytical hierarchy process (case study: Kaan River Valley Tehran-Iran). Environmental Researches. 4(8):105-116. [Persian] [Link]
4. Divsalar A, Tavakoli M, Khademi AH (2016). Management in tourism sustainable development the role of urban (case study: Nour coastal city). Natural Ecosystems of Iran. 7(4):83-97. [Persian] [Link]
5. Dunn CP, Heneghan L (2011). Composition and diversity of urban vegetation. In: Urban ecology: Patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 103-115. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563562.003.0013]
6. Ebrahimi Dehkordi S (2020). The role of ecological urban edges in the quality of urban space. Architecture. 3(16):1-5. [Persian] [Link]
7. Esmaieli A, Latifi Oskoee N (2016). Economic valuation of Aoun Bin Ali Tabari forest park. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 10(4):208-217. [Persian] [Link]
8. Farhadi Uonaki M, Khoshkhoo MH (2022). The impact of tourism infrastructures on tourists' loyalty (case study: Isfahan). Journal of Tourism and Development. 11(1):129-142. [Persian] [Link]
9. GSTC (2019). GSTC destination criteria [Internet]. Washington: Global Sustainable Tourism Council [cited 2024, October, 21]. Available from: https://www.gstcouncil.org/gstc-criteria/gstc-destination-criteria/. [Link]
10. Güneralp B, Güneralp İ, Liu Y (2015). Changing global patterns of urban exposure to flood and drought hazards. Global Environmental Change. 31:217-225. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.002]
11. Hatami Y, Zakerhaghighi K (2017). Evaluation of the effect of the quality of the urban environment on the social relations of space use (case study: Abu Ali Sina walkway in Hamedan). Research and Urban Planning. 8(30):245-266. [Persian] [Link]
12. Hemmati M, Amiri A (2016). Resilience: Changing aesthetic attitudes towards a changing environment (focusing on the Hudson River Coastal Park project). Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Structure, Architecture and Urban Development. Tehran: CIVILICA. [Persian] [Link]
13. Jahantighmand S, Zeinivand Y, Moosavi Nadoushan M (2023). Organizing the spatial space of the urban rivers' margin of tourism development (case study of Poldokhtar city). Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences. 23(68):43-60. [Persian] [Link]
14. James EE, Essien AU (2019). Infrastructure and sustainable tourism development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities Social Science. 24(1):72-80. [Link]
15. Jomehpour M, Shabnaz Ettehad S, Nourian F (2019). Ecological city of Bojnourd based on scenario-based future studies. Quarterly Journals of Urban & Regional Development Planning. 3(7):1-30. [Persian] [Link]
16. Kameri-Mbote P, Kamunge I, Yatich JK (2021). Country report for Kenya. In: African soil protection law. Baden-Baden: Nomos eLibrary. p. 177-294. [Link] [DOI:10.5771/9783748908043-177]
17. Keshvarparast S, Parsaee J (2015). Organizing urban rivers with a sustainable environmental development approach (case study: Mahmoudabad city). Proceedings of the International Conference on New Research in Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. Kuala Lumpur: Public Relations at Karin Conference. [Persian] [Link]
18. Khan A, Bibi S, Ardito L, Lyu J, Hayat H, Arif AM (2020). Revisiting the dynamics of tourism, economic growth, and environmental pollutants in the emerging economies-sustainable tourism policy implications. Sustainability. 12(6):2533. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su12062533]
19. Khoshghadam F, Razzaghi Asl S (2017). Strategies to improve environmental quality in the renovation of Farahzad deteriorated area by strategic-hierarchical analysis (SWOT-AHP). Research and Urban Planning. 7(27):37-58. [Persian] [Link]
20. Kiani Salmi S, Afzali A (2020). Evaluating local community attitudes towards the effects of mass tourism (case study: Boyer-Ahmad County). Research and Rural Planning. 9(1):73-89. [Link]
21. Lam-González YE, Clouet R, Cruz Sosa N, De León J (2021). Dissatisfaction responses of tourists in the Havana World Heritage Site. Sustainability. 13(19):11015. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su131911015]
22. Motavali S, Koozehgar Kaleji K (2017). Land use organization along the rivers in sustainable urban development, case study: Lavij River, Shahr-e-Noor. Proceedings of the International Conference on Contemporary Iran in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. Tehran: OSVE Institute of Higher Education. [Persian] [Link]
23. Saberi Nahrafrouzani A, Mansouri SA (2021). "New Zayanderood" investigation with the Zayanderood stream recognition and examination it as a socio-ecological system. BAGH-E-NAZAR. 18(102):101-114. [Persian] [Link]
24. UN Tourism (2023). Sustainable development [Internet]. Madrid: UN Tourism [cited 2024, June, 12]. Available from: https://www.unwto.org/sustainable-development. [Link]
25. Vasilakakis K, Tabouratzi E, Sdrali D (2023). Economic sustainability of tourism enterprises: A proposal of criteria in the hotels. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 8(4):e01769. [Link] [DOI:10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1769]