Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 35, Issue 4 (2020)
GeoRes 2020, 35(4): 377-386 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2020/07/10 | Accepted: 2020/08/8 | Published: 2020/08/11
Received: 2020/07/10 | Accepted: 2020/08/8 | Published: 2020/08/11
How to cite this article
Nazemi G, Rezazadeh R, Saghatoleslami A, Sarvari H. Evaluation of the Application of the “Master Plan Model” in Iranian Urban Planning Environment. GeoRes 2020; 35 (4) :377-386
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-912-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-912-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran Science and Technology University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Iran Science and Technology University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (3364 Views)
Aims: The frequency of criticisms about the “Master Plan Model” and its long-term and almost unchanging persistence, despite the extensive instabilities before and after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, indicate the need to examine the "relationship between the planning style and the planning environment" that has been forgotten. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application of this model in the Iranian planning environment.
Methodology: In the research process, the ‘planning style’ and ‘Planning style identification device’ were clarified by the documentary research method. And, by the content analysis method and its relevant reasoning styles, the elements of two groups: “the planning environment of Iran” and “the determinants of, and constraints on, planning factors” that used to selecting the compatibility planning style, both of them elucidate the “Planning style identification device” indicators, were evaluated.
Findings: The characters of “the big image” of Iran's planning environment was: an unstable figure; indeterminacy future visions; a planning environment which is under control of political system and government structures; an unsustainable community with several Cleavages in society and a Specific feature that named “Iranian-Islamic” society. And also shown that the effected factors in evaluating planning style is: “uncertain” on ‘image’; “holistic” in ‘community image’; “wide” for ‘Scope of image’; “incomplete” in ‘controlling the planning environment’; “small” in ‘Relative autonomy’; “political role” for ‘The planner role’ and with high “internal and external planning time”.
Conclusion: The suitable planning style for the Iranian planning environment: In the ‘planning approach’ tends to “process planning with a timing revision framework”; in the ‘Review & Evaluation’ tends to “Comprehensive Rational Planning” and in the ‘planning act’ tends to “normative planning”. Also it was illustrated the inconsistency of the Iranian planning environment with the current ‘Master Plan model’ and the “rational comprehensive planning” can be the suitable planning style.
Methodology: In the research process, the ‘planning style’ and ‘Planning style identification device’ were clarified by the documentary research method. And, by the content analysis method and its relevant reasoning styles, the elements of two groups: “the planning environment of Iran” and “the determinants of, and constraints on, planning factors” that used to selecting the compatibility planning style, both of them elucidate the “Planning style identification device” indicators, were evaluated.
Findings: The characters of “the big image” of Iran's planning environment was: an unstable figure; indeterminacy future visions; a planning environment which is under control of political system and government structures; an unsustainable community with several Cleavages in society and a Specific feature that named “Iranian-Islamic” society. And also shown that the effected factors in evaluating planning style is: “uncertain” on ‘image’; “holistic” in ‘community image’; “wide” for ‘Scope of image’; “incomplete” in ‘controlling the planning environment’; “small” in ‘Relative autonomy’; “political role” for ‘The planner role’ and with high “internal and external planning time”.
Conclusion: The suitable planning style for the Iranian planning environment: In the ‘planning approach’ tends to “process planning with a timing revision framework”; in the ‘Review & Evaluation’ tends to “Comprehensive Rational Planning” and in the ‘planning act’ tends to “normative planning”. Also it was illustrated the inconsistency of the Iranian planning environment with the current ‘Master Plan model’ and the “rational comprehensive planning” can be the suitable planning style.
English Expanded Abstract [HTML 19 KB] (48 Download)
References
1. Abbaszadegan M, Razavi H (2006). Adopting a new approach to urban development plans design-based planning. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. (28):15-22. [Persian]
2. Ajlali Parviz, Rafieian M, Asgari A (2017). Planning theories: Traditional and new perspectives. Tehran: Aghah Publication. [Persian]
3. Allmendinger P (2008). Planning theory. Bahman Teymouri E. translator. Tehran: Azarakhash Publication. [Persian]
4. Barati N (2006). Challenges have to be faced in the context of urbanism in Iran at the beginning of the 21th century. Bagh- E Nazar. 3(6):5-29. [Persian]
5. Daneshpour A, Behzadfar M, Burkpour N, Sharafi M (2017). Participatory planning environment: A conceptual model for analysis of effective factors in citizen participation in planning. Letter of Architecture and Urban Development. 9(18):23-43. [Persian]
6. Daneshvar M, Bandarabad A (2013). studying about adaptation new master plan with specifications of structural strategic plan, case study: Mashhad's comprehensives plan. Hoviatshahr. 7(14):83-92. [Persian]
7. Elyaszadeh Moghaddam N (2011). Surveying and feasibility of replacement of structural-strategic model with urban comprehensive planning model in Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 4(6):35-48. [Persian]
8. Estelaji A (2009). Comprehensive planning land preparation with emphasis approach systematic. Geography. 3(10):71-87. [Persian]
9. Fainstein S, DeFilippis J (2012). Readings in planning theory. 4th ed Edition. New York: Wiley Publiction.
10. Faludi A (1970). The planning environment and the meaning of planning. Regional Studies. 4(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1080/09595237000185011]
11. Faludi A (1973). Planning theory. 1st ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press
12. Firozi MA, Sajjadian N, Alizade H (2016). Prioritizing the application of non-euclidean planning theory of John friedman in Iranian urban planning. Geographical Space Journal. 16(53):1-21. [Persian]
13. Ghavam A, Malmir M (2015). An analytical framework for study of nation-state cleavage: Modeling and pattering of relations between state and society. Research Letter of Political Science. 10(1):157-197. [Persian]
14. Habibi K, BehzadFar M, Meshkini A, Alizadeh H, Mekhi W (2011). Evaluating the impacts of urban development plans on deconstruction and quality improvement of ancient Iranian space. Islamic Iranian Quarterly. 1(4):15-28. [Persian]
15. Habibi M, Tahsildar M, PourMohammad Reza N (2011). A description of the principles and principles of indigenous urban planning in relation to contemporary urban theories. Housing and Rural Environment. 30(135):3-22. [Persian]
16. Hashemi Toghr oljerdi SM (2016). Assessment and criticism of the decisions of the supreme council for urbanism and architecture about Islamic identity of urbanism and Iranian architecture. Iran University of Science & Technology. 4(3):21-40. [Persian]
17. Husseinzadeh Dalir K, Pourmohammadi MR, Soltani A (2011). Investigating the influencing factors on the inefficiency of Iranian master plans case study: Tabriz master plans). Geography and Planning .15(31):131-151. [Persian]
18. Husseinzadeh Dalir K, SadrMousavi M, HeydariChinay R, Rezatabe K (2012). An introduction to the new approach of urban development strategy [CDS] on the urban planning process with emphasis on the challenges of master plans in Iran. Geographical Space Journal. 11(36):173-210. [Persian]
19. Kazemian G, Jalili M (2015). Key stakeholders power analysis of policy making process in Tehran's strategic-structural plan (1999-2011). Journal of Architecture and Urban Plannig. 8(15)139-158. [Persian]
20. Majedi H (2013). Structural-Strategic planning theory. Hoviatshahr. 6(11):17-26. [Persian]
21. Malekpour B, Alimohammadi M, Katoozian S (2012). The proposed outline issues in strategic planning for urban revitalization and comparative comparison the theoretical framework and its usage requirements for Tehran strategic-structural Planning. Haft Shahr. 3(41-42):36-57. [Persian]
22. Mashhodi S (2007). The bases of urban smooth plans. 2nd ed. Tehran: Pardazesh va Barnamerizi Shahri Company Publication. [Persian]
23. Moghimi A (2015). Future epistemology of theoretical approaches to urban planning, architecture and building industry. Urban and Rural Management. 14(38):75-104. [Persian]
24. Morsali F, Ashraf Nazari A (2016). Emerging social gaps and analyzing social cohesion in Iran: Analyzing the goals of the document of Iran's Vision on 2026. The 5th Iranian Islamic Model of Progress Conference: Basic Pattern of Progress. 2016, 18-19 May: Tehran, pp. 1-20 [Persian]
25. Mortazavi Hashtrodi M, Moradi Kopaei A (2019). Social gaps in Iran and its impact on political survival of the islamic republic of Iran 1979-2002. The 6th National Conference on Sustainable Development in Educational and Psychological Sciences, Social and Cultural Studies. 2018, 23 Arpil: Tehran, pp. 1-20 [Persian]
26. Mosavi A, Rafieian M (2005). Evaluation of the feasibility of comprehensive and detailed plans of East Azarbaijan cities. Journal of Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz. 17:177-202. [Persian]
27. Mosavi MN, Modiri M, Kohaki F (2017). Determining Iranian islamic influential factors and indicators in the balanced development of Khorasan Razavi province using MicMac software. Urban and Rural Management. 15(45):7-30. [Persian]
28. Mowlaei M, Rahimirad Z (2018). The study of poverty among Iran's urban households in five economic development plans: 1989-2015. The Economic Reseach. 18(3):167-192. [Persian]
29. Naghizade M (2011). A reflection on what islamic city is. Iranian Islamic city. 1(1):1-14. [Persian]
30. Nasri G, Morsali F (2019). New social cleavages and political legitimacy: Case study of Iran from 2017-2027. Contemporary Political Studies. 10(1):81-100. [Persian]
31. Nemati M, Damanbagh S, Sajadian N (2019). Analysis of the digital divide among socioeconomic groups The cases of citizens of Kianpars, Golestan and Ameri districts in Ahvaz. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies. 7(28):7-18. [Persian]
32. Pour Ahmad A, Hataminejad H, Hosseini H (2006). Pathology of urban development plans in Iran. Geographical Research. 38(58):167-180. [Persian]
33. Qarakhani M (2017). Social policy in Iran: The gap between the state and the nation. Social Sciences. 23(75):93-118. [Persian]
34. Sarrafi M, Tavakkolinia J, Chamani Moghaddam M (2014). Planners' position in the Iranian urban planning process. Motaleate Shahri. 3(12):19-32. [Persian]
35. Sarvar R, Sharif Jahed S, Tavakkolan A (2015). Ranking of Tehran urban development plans based on planning principles. Geography. 13(46):155-179. [Persian]
36. Seyed- al hoseini S, Habib F, Majedi H (2012). Application of design-based planning as interactional approach in macro and micro scale plans. Bagh- E Nazar. 9(22):45-54. [Persian]
37. Shafie Dastjerdy M (2013). Renovation of deteriorated areas and the necessity of reorientation in preparation and execution of master and detailed plans a case study: The master and detailed plan of Isfahan city. The Bagh- E Nazar. 10(24):91-104. [Persian]
38. ShakouriAsl S, Rafieian M (2016). Usage of spatial decision support systems in urban planning. Hoviatshahr. 9(24):35-42. [Persian]
39. Zangi Abadi A, Abdullahi M, Salek Ghahforkhi R, Qasemzadeh B (2013). Evaluation of factors influencing the implementation of urban master plans in Iran and there challenges case study: Historical-cultural axis of district 6 of Tabriz]. Urban Planning and Research. 5(18):41-58. [Persian]
Send email to the article author