Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 39, Issue 3 (2024)
GeoRes 2024, 39(3): 369-377 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2024/09/8 | Accepted: 2024/10/8 | Published: 2024/10/20
Received: 2024/09/8 | Accepted: 2024/10/8 | Published: 2024/10/20
How to cite this article
Shayegan M, Ranjbar M, Reza B, Arbabi A. Climate Comfort Conditions for Tourism in Hamadan Province. GeoRes 2024; 39 (3) :369-377
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1645-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1645-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Geography, Yadegar-e-eImam Khomeini (RAH), Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Geography, Yadegar-e-eImam Khomeini (RAH), Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract (673 Views)
Aims: This research sought to assess the climate comfort conditions for tourism in Hamadan Province.
Methodology: This applied study, conducted in 2023 in Hamadan Province, utilized climate data gathered from meteorological stations across the region. Key climatic variables, including temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure, were collected from 2004 to 2018. The meteorological stations examined included Hamadan, Tuyserkan, Asadabad, Razan, Famenin, Nahavand, Qahavand, Nojeh, and Malayer. After gathering the data, the Stress Index, the Steadman-Tom Temperature-Humidity Index, and the Climate Potential Index were calculated and analyzed across various time periods, such as different seasons, to determine which periods and areas provided optimal climatic conditions for tourism.
Findings: The models revealed consistent patterns, including climatic homogeneity and stability, persistent cold in winter, variations in climate between spring and summer, and unfavorable conditions during winter. All three indices indicated that climate changes in the Hamadan region have been gradual, without extreme fluctuations, leading to uniform conditions within each season. This consistency across the indices suggests that, despite methodological differences, the overall findings regarding climatic and thermal comfort were similar.
Conclusion: Most meteorological stations in Hamadan report unfavorable bioclimatic conditions for tourism in January and February, with March also being suboptimal. The most favorable months for tourism in Hamadan Province are May, June, and September.
Methodology: This applied study, conducted in 2023 in Hamadan Province, utilized climate data gathered from meteorological stations across the region. Key climatic variables, including temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure, were collected from 2004 to 2018. The meteorological stations examined included Hamadan, Tuyserkan, Asadabad, Razan, Famenin, Nahavand, Qahavand, Nojeh, and Malayer. After gathering the data, the Stress Index, the Steadman-Tom Temperature-Humidity Index, and the Climate Potential Index were calculated and analyzed across various time periods, such as different seasons, to determine which periods and areas provided optimal climatic conditions for tourism.
Findings: The models revealed consistent patterns, including climatic homogeneity and stability, persistent cold in winter, variations in climate between spring and summer, and unfavorable conditions during winter. All three indices indicated that climate changes in the Hamadan region have been gradual, without extreme fluctuations, leading to uniform conditions within each season. This consistency across the indices suggests that, despite methodological differences, the overall findings regarding climatic and thermal comfort were similar.
Conclusion: Most meteorological stations in Hamadan report unfavorable bioclimatic conditions for tourism in January and February, with March also being suboptimal. The most favorable months for tourism in Hamadan Province are May, June, and September.
References
1. Adger WN (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?. Progress in Human Geography. 24(3):347-364. [Link] [DOI:10.1191/030913200701540465]
2. Adger WN (2009). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography. 79(4):387-404. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x]
3. Banafsheh MR, Abdolalizadeh F (2018). Study of tourism climate in East Azarbaijan province using CPI index. Proceeding of the 2nd National Iranian Climate Conference. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [Persian] [Link]
4. Bloor JMG, Bardgett RD (2012). Stability of above-ground and below-ground processes to extreme drought in model grassland ecosystems: Interactions with plant species diversity and soil nitrogen availability. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 14(3):193-204. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.12.001]
5. Bujosa A, Riera A, Torres CM (2015). Valuing tourism demand attributes to guide climate change adaptation measures efficiently: The case of the Spanish domestic travel market. Tourism Management. 47:233-239. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.023]
6. Dilling L, Daly ME, Travis WR, Wilhelmi OV, Klein RA (2015). The dynamics of vulnerability: Why adapting to climate variability will not always prepare us for climate change. WIREs Climate Change. 6(4):413-425. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/wcc.341]
7. Dogru T, Marchio EA, Bulut U, Suess C (2019). Climate change: Vulnerability and resilience of tourism and the entire economy. Tourism Management. 72:292-305. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.010]
8. Faridi E, Azimi F (2018). Compare the thermal comfort of tourists in the city of Abadan and Zanjan. Quarterly of Geography & Regional Planning. 8(30):167-177. [Link]
9. Füssel HM, Hildén M (2014). How is uncertainty addressed in the knowledge base for national adaptation planning?. In: Adapting to an uncertain climate. Cham: Springer. p. 41-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-04876-5_3]
10. Gössling S, Scott D, Michael Hall C, Ceron JP, Dubois G (2012). Consumer behaviour and demand response of tourists to climate change. Annals of Tourism Research. 39(1):36-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.002]
11. Hall CM, Amelung B, Cohen S, Eijgelaar E, Gössling S, Higham J, et al (2015). Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research. Tourism Management. 47:352-356. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.009]
12. Hamilton JM, Maddison DJ, Tol RS (2005). Climate change and international tourism: A simulation study. Global Environmental Change. 15(3):253-266. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.009]
13. Hyman TA (2014). Assessing the vulnerability of beach tourism and non-beach tourism to climate change: A case study from Jamaica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 22(8):1197-1215. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2013.855220]
14. Ionescu C, Richard J, Klein T, Hinkel J, Kavi Kumar KS, Klein R (2009). Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. 14(1): 1-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10666-008-9179-x]
15. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Link]
16. Kazemirad L, Abedi R (2024). Assessment of ecotourism potential of Arasbaran forest using CPI bioclimatic index. Journal of Climate Research. [Persian] [Link]
17. Khaledi S, Karimi Y, Ebdali H, Mohammadi GH (2020). Analyze of comfort climate indexes and its relation to tourism in Tabriz. Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment. 1(1):73-81. [Persian] [Link]
18. Khalili Azandehi F, Ehteshami Zh (2014). Investigating the temporal conditions of tourism climate in Alasht using the nervous pressure index. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Green Tourism. Hamedan: Mofateh University. [Persian] [Link]
19. Liu LW, Pahrudin P, Tsai CY, Hao L (2024). Disaster, risk and crises in tourism and hospitality field: A pathway toward tourism and hospitality management framework for resilience and recovery process. Natural Hazards Research. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nhres.2024.06.001]
20. Neuvonen M, Sievänen T, Fronzek S, Lahtinen I, Veijalainen N, Carter TR (2015). Vulnerability of cross-country skiing to climate change in Finland-An interactive mapping tool. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 11:64-79. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.010]
21. Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B (2007). Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environmental Change. 17(3-4):472-485. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.005]
22. Richardson RB, Witkowski K (2010). Economic vulnerability to climate change for tourism-dependent nations. Tourism Analysis. 15(3):315-330. [Link] [DOI:10.3727/108354210X12801550666105]
23. Roscher C, Fergus AJF, Petermann JS, Buchmann N, Schmid B, Schulze ED (2013). What happens to the sown species if a biodiversity experiment is not weeded?. Basic and Applied Ecology. 14(3):187-198. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.baae.2013.01.003]
24. Scott D, Gössling S, Hall CM (2012). International tourism and climate change. WIREs Climate Change. 3(3):213-232. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/wcc.165]
25. Shani A, Arad B (2014). Climate change and tourism: Time for environmental skepticism. Tourism Management. 44:82-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.02.014]
26. Smit B, Wandel J (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change. 16(3):282-292. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008]
27. Watson JEM, Iwamura T, Butt N (2013). Mapping vulnerability and conservation adaptation strategies under climate change. Nature Climate Change. 3(11):989-994. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/nclimate2007]