Persian
Volume 38, Issue 4 (2023)                   GeoRes 2023, 38(4): 523-531 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Keyvan H, Ranjbar Q, Souri H. An Analysis of China's Geopolitics and Energy Security in the Persian Gulf Region. GeoRes 2023; 38 (4) :523-531
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1544-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Political Science and International Relations, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Political Science, Farabi University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Political Science and International Relations, Research and Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Daneshgah Square, Tehran, Iran. Postal code: 1477893855 (hassankeyvan@yahoo.com)
Abstract   (1086 Views)
Aims: Energy geopolitics is a prominent sphere of competition that exerts a crucial and decisive influence on China's foreign policy. Within the diverse geographical regions of the world, the geopolitical domain encompassing the Persian Gulf has engendered substantial geopolitical pursuits among various actors due to its abundant reservoirs of oil and gas. In light of this circumstance, China, as a global hegemon, has delineated significant interests in this region for itself, deeming it necessary to augment and safeguard them all. In the context of this descriptive-analytical inquiry, the endeavor was made to scrutinize China's energy geopolitical interests and the objectives of this nation in protecting these interests, alongside the ramifications of geopolitical energy strategies in the Persian Gulf region on different actors, employing the approaches that govern the knowledge of political geography.
Conclusion: The establishment of collaboration among the nations situated in the Persian Gulf and China has emerged as the fundamental basis for the augmentation of China's economic and political sway in the region, thereby posing a threat to the national interests of the United States. The economic influence of China possesses the potential to render the competition between the two nations more intricate in the geopolitical dynamics. Consequently, within this process, any nation that can skillfully exploit the prevailing circumstances governing the rivalry between China and the United States through the utilization of multilateral diplomacy appears to be capable of reaping the utmost advantages for itself.
Keywords:

References
1. Ahmadypour Z, Rashidi Y (2018). A geopolitical analysis: Representation of spaces of fear in cinema. International Quarterly of Geopolitics. 14(50):21-55. [Persian] [Link]
2. Ahmadypour Z, Rashidi Y (2020). Geographical imaging and geopolitical representation. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [Persian] [Link]
3. Ang BW, Choong WL, Ng TS (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 42:1077-1093. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064]
4. Buzan B, Waever O (2009). Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: Reconsidering scale in securitisation theory. Review of International Studies. 35(2):253-276. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0260210509008511]
5. Costantini V, Gracceva F, Markandya A, Vicini G (2007). Security of energy supply: Comparing scenarios from European perspective. Energy Policy. 35(1):210-226. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.002]
6. Cox RW (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 10(2):126-155. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/03058298810100020501]
7. Degong PM, Ullah F, Ullah R, Arif M (2023). An empirical nexus between exchange rate and China's outward foreign direct investment: Implications for Pakistan under the China Pakistan economic corridor project. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 87:224-234. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2020.12.001]
8. Dehshiri MR, Hosseini SM, Shiravand S, Hoosseini SM (2017). The effect of regional security on behavioral of regional security complexes. World Politics. 6(1):43-78. [Persian] [Link]
9. Diez T (2013). Normative power as hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict. 48(2):194-210. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0010836713485387]
10. Falahi E, Omidi A (2019). Comparative analysis of China's energy geopolitics in the Persian Gulf and Central Asia; With an eye on Iran's position. Energy Economics. 15(61):29-66. [Persian] [Link]
11. Garlick J, Halvova R (2020). China's "Belt and Road" economic diplomacy in the Persian Gulf: Strategic heding amidst Saudi-Iranian regional rivalry. Journal of Current Chineses Affairs. 49(1):82-105. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1868102619898706]
12. Gharayagh Zandi D, Abbassi M (2021). China's strategic development and foreign policy in the middle east in the second decade of 21st century: The whys and the wherefores. International Political Economy Studies. 4(2):493-522. [Persian] [Link]
13. Jaschock M, Chan HMV (2009). Education, gender and Islam in China: The place of religious education in challenging and sustaining 'undisputed traditions' among Chinese Muslim women. International Journal of Educational Development. 29(5):487-494. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.04.004]
14. Jakóbowski J (2018). Chinese-led regional multilateralism in central and eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16+1, FOCAC, and CCF. Journal of Contemporary China. 27(113):659-673. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10670564.2018.1458055]
15. Kavalski E (2009). Do as I do: The global politics of China's regionalization. In: Kavalski E, editor. China and the global politics of regionalization. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited. [Link]
16. Kenderdine T, Lan P (2018). China's middle east investment policy. Eurasian Geography and Economics. 59(5-6):557-584. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15387216.2019.1573516]
17. Kulkarni SS, Kristle Nathan HS (2016). The elephant and the tiger: Energy security, geopolitics, and national strategy in China and India's cross border gas pipelines. Energy Research & Social Science. 11:183-194. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.010]
18. Manners I (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?. Journal of Common Market Studies. 40(2):235-258. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1468-5965.00353]
19. Mojtahedzadeh P (2008). Political geography and geographic politics. Tehran: SAMT Press. [Link]
20. Murphy AB (2006). Enhancing geography's role in public debate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 96(1):1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00495.x]
21. North DC (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511808678]
22. Nye J (2017). Soft power: The origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications. 3:17008. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/palcomms.2017.8]
23. Rashidi Y, Ahmadipour Z, Alemi A, Bayat M (2021). The role of geographical imagination and geopolitical representation in dividing space/place into "our" and "their". Geopolitics Quarterly. 16(60):79-100. [Persian] [Link]
24. Rashidi Y, AhmadiPour Z, Karimi M (2016). The impact of cyber space on Egypt's revolution. International Journal of Humanities. 23(1):99-117. [Persian] [Link]
25. Reeves J (2018). China's silk road economic belt initiative: Network and influence formation in central Asia. Journal of Contemporary China. 27(112):502-518. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10670564.2018.1433480]
26. Rothschild E (1995). What is security?. Daedalus. 124(3):53-98. [Link]
27. Salimi H, Rahmati Poor L (2015). Comparison of energy strategy between China and the United States and its impact on the Persian Gulf. Political Strategic Studies. 3(11):129-160. [Persian] [Link]
28. Scholten D, Bazilian M, Overland I, Westphal K (2020). The geopolitics of renewables: New board, new game. Energy Policy. 138:111059. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111059]
29. Sharafkhani M, Hajimineh R, Dehshiri MR (2022). China's economic strategy in hegemonic competition with the United States in the Middle East. Political Strategic Studies. 11(40):67-106. [Persian] [Link]
30. Committee on Energy and Commerce (2015). 21st century energy markets: How the changing dynamics of world energy markets impact our economy and energy security. Washington: U.S. Government Publishing Office. [Link]
31. Tang S (2013). The social evolution of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658336.001.0001]
32. Tessman BF (2012). System structure and state strategy: Adding hedging to the menu. Security Studies. 21(2):192-231. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09636412.2012.679203]
33. Tessman B, Wolfe W (2011). Great powers and strategic hedging: The case of Chinese energy security strategy. International Studies Review. 13(2):214-240. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01022.x]
34. Ullman RH (1983). Redefining security. International Security. 8(1):129-153. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2538489]
35. Yao K (2014). China-Arab states cooperation forum in the last decade. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia). 8(4):26-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/19370679.2014.12023253]
36. Yuan M, Zhang H, Wang B, Huang L, Fang K, Liang Y (2020). Downstream oil supply security in China: Policy implications from quantifying the impact of oil import disruption. Energy Policy. 136:111077. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111077]
37. Wolfe WM (2013). China's strategic hedging. Orbis. 57(2):300-313. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.orbis.2013.02.011]
38. Zaki Y, Golfeshan A (2015). World cities and new geopolitical maps. The Journal of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 24(95):63-80. [Persian] [Link]