Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 1 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(1): 27-37 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/12/1 | Accepted: 2021/12/23 | Published: 2022/02/27
Received: 2021/12/1 | Accepted: 2021/12/23 | Published: 2022/02/27
How to cite this article
Moradgholi A, Anvari M, Miri S. Physical Planning with a Passive Defense Approach in the City of Zahedan. GeoRes 2022; 37 (1) :27-37
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1262-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1262-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract (974 Views)
Aims: Observance of passive defense requirements is one of the necessary principles for the sustainable development of the city's facilities and infrastructure and the protection of people's lives and property is considered, Therefore, the attention of managers and officials to the principles of passive defense provides the necessary grounds for advancing this new approach in order to promote the concept of urban safety and security. The aim of the present study was to Physical planning with a passive defense approach in the city of Zahedan.
Methodology: The present descriptive-analytical research was conducted in 2021. This research is applied in terms of purpose. Collecting information and data in the form of documents and libraries and using the studies of consulting engineers and related organizations and extracting data from GIS maps of the city. For data analysis, Super Decisions (ANP model) and Arc GIS software was used.
Finding: The results of combining the maps using GIS-ANP method showed, In the event of a crisis, out of the total area of the city, an area of about 735 hectares is in an unfavorable condition, 1240 hectares with relatively unfavorable condition, 3120 hectares average, 2187 hectares are relatively suitable and 790 hectares were in good condition.
Conclusion: And on the suburbs city, especially in the southern half, it was unsuitable and completely unsuitable.
Methodology: The present descriptive-analytical research was conducted in 2021. This research is applied in terms of purpose. Collecting information and data in the form of documents and libraries and using the studies of consulting engineers and related organizations and extracting data from GIS maps of the city. For data analysis, Super Decisions (ANP model) and Arc GIS software was used.
Finding: The results of combining the maps using GIS-ANP method showed, In the event of a crisis, out of the total area of the city, an area of about 735 hectares is in an unfavorable condition, 1240 hectares with relatively unfavorable condition, 3120 hectares average, 2187 hectares are relatively suitable and 790 hectares were in good condition.
Conclusion: And on the suburbs city, especially in the southern half, it was unsuitable and completely unsuitable.
Keywords:
References
1. Abdolahzade Fard A (2020). A search on the role of urban security in passive defense case study: Shiraz metropolis. The Urban Research and Planning Quarterly. 11(40):189-200. [Persian] [Link]
2. Alhawasli H, Daneshjoo Kh (2018). Improving residential buildings performance against the explosion using passive defense requirements case study: designing a residential building in damascus. Trends in Civil Engineering and its Architecture. 2(3):1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.32474/TCEIA.2018.02.000138]
3. Amini E, Habib F, Mojtahedzadeh G (2010). Land use planning and its effects on reduced city vulnerability against earthquake. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(3):161-174. [Persian] [Link]
4. Anvari MR, Nazmi Feyzabadi A (2017). Spatial management of pathology of urban security and the necessity of passive defense in urban planning (case study: zones two and three of Mashhad municipality). Journal of Geographical Sciences. 13(26):31-46. [Persian] [Link]
5. Bornafar M, Afradi K (2014). Prioritize vital, sensitive and important centers of Bandar Anzali and provide defense solutions from the perspective of passive defense. Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences. 14(32):161-179. [Persian] [Link]
6. Brandon P (2011). Extreme Management in Disaster Recovery. Journal of Procedia Engineering. (14):84-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.009]
7. Fredro M (2009). Introduction to passive defense: public opinion and psychological warfare. Tehran: Abed Publications. [Persian] [Link]
8. Hataminejad H, Abdali Y, Allah Gholipour S (2018). Assessing the structural vulnerability of urban distressed areas against hazards with passive defense approach case study: central worn texture of Ahvaz metropolis. Geographical Data. 26(104):159-172. [Persian] [Link]
9. Hosseini A, Mohammadian M, Naseri Manesh A, Hajiaghaei Kamrani M (2018). Investigating the role of passive defense in reducing natural disasters (earthquake) to enhance security and justice of Tabriz metropolitan. Journal of Geography and Spatial Development. 1(1):1-18. [Persian] [Link]
10. Huseini Amini H, Amiriyan S, Bodaghlo S, Nayeri B, Peyvastegar Y (2019). Evaluation of urban structure in the planning of civil defense using SWOT (case study: Bushehr City). Geography (Regional Planning). 9(2):539-555. [Persian] [Link]
11. Jozi Khamselooei A, Javaheran H (2013). An analysis of the role passive defense plays in strategic security of metropolises. Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 22(87):78-92 [Persian] [Link]
12. Kamran H, Hosaini Amini H, Parizadi T (2012). Analysis of Shahriar city structure and passive defense strategies. Geography. 9(30):5-37. [Persian] [Link]
13. Kamran H, Hosaini Amini H (2012). Position analysis of Shahriar official city based on passive defense principles. Geography and Environmental Planning. 23(3):163-176. [Persian] [Link]
14. Lacinák M (2019). Implementation of safe city concept-procedure of choosing new safety measures. Transportation Research Procedia. 40:1441-1448. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.199]
15. Mohammadi Dahcheshmeh M, Firouzi M, Nazarpour Dazki R (2017). The assessment of proximity in sensing land use, from the perspective of urban passive defense study proximity to major hospitals in Ahwaz. Human Geography Research. 49(2):259-272. [Persian] [Link]
16. Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh M, Hidarynia S (2015). The spatial modeling of proximity in special land use from passive defense point of view in Ahvaz metropolis. The Journal of Spatial Planning. 19(2):211-236. [Persian] [Link]
17. Mohebati M, Estelaji A (2022). Assessment of physical-economic and environmental factors affecting urban space vulnerability analysis in earthquake enjoying passive defense (case study: area5 Shahre Rey, district 20 Tehran). Journal of Applied Scientific Journals Management System. 22(65):157-171. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.52547/jgs.22.65.157]
18. Rousta M, Ebrahimazadeh I, Istgaldi M (2018). Assessment of urban social resilience (case study: city of Zahedan). The Urban Research and Planning Quarterly. 9(32):1-14. [Persian] [Link]
19. Salari Sardari F, Kiani A (2018). Analysis of the principles and approaches of passive defense in planning the use of urban lands. Passive Defense. 9(2):11-24. [Persian] [Link]
20. Salari Sardari F, Bazi K, Salari Sardari F (2014). Survey to determine the priority of public spaces, city Development Strategies of Assalouyeh Using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Geographical Research. 28(4):195-210. [Persian] [Link]
21. Sartiak S, Zaeimdar M, Masoudrahimi A, Jozi S, Reza Khaledi H (2020). Use of passive defense based on urban transportation system (Case study: east Isfahan region). Physical Geography Quarterly. 13(50):129-148. [Persian] [Link]
22. Siami G, Latifi G, Taghinezhad K, Zahedikalali E (2014). Pathology of defensive urban structure using analytical hierarchy process AHP and GIS; case study: Gorgan. Geographical Planning of Space. 3(10):23-43. [Persian] [Link]
23. Taghvaei M, Jovzi Khameslouei A (2012). Management and planning of crisis in urban spaces with passive defense approach and SWOT model. Geographical Planning of Space. 2(6):57-74. [Persian] [Link]
24. Tang A, Wen A (2009). An intelligent simulation system for earthquake disaster assessment. Computers & Geosciences. 35(5):871-879. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.003]
25. Xu J, Lu Y (2018). Towards an earthquake-resilient world: from post disaster reconstruction to pre-disaster prevention. Environmental Hazards. 17(4):269-275. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17477891.2018.1500878]
26. Yazdani MH (2017). Assessment the vulnerability of infrastructures in Ardabil City in terms of passive defense. Scientific Journals Management System. 17(44):179-199. [Persian] [Link]
27. Yazdani M, Saidain A (2017). Investigating the vulnerability of the city from the passive defense perspective (Case study: Ardabil city). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 25(100):17-34. [Persian] [Link]