Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 1 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(1): 141-153 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/08/29 | Accepted: 2021/11/16 | Published: 2022/01/22
Received: 2021/08/29 | Accepted: 2021/11/16 | Published: 2022/01/22
How to cite this article
Lotfi H, Noori Kermani A, Ziari K. Spatial Analysis of Physical Resilience Components of Ilam City against Earthquake with a Futuristic Approach. GeoRes 2022; 37 (1) :141-153
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1204-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1204-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Geography and Urban planning, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Geography and Urban planning, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (1570 Views)
Aims: Today, the issue of resilience is one of the most important study topics in the world. The aim of this study was to spatially analyze the components of physical resilience in Ilam against earthquakes using a future studies approach.
Methodology: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method, which was conducted from 2020 to 2021 in Ilam. A total of 44 specialists in the field of resilience and futures research were selected by the available sampling method and purposefully participated in the study. For spatial analysis of physical resilience components, five indices of the building structure, material type, number of floors, granulation, and age of buildings were analyzed using Geoda 1.20.0.8 and ArcGIS 10.4.1 software. Continuation, using the Delphi technique and application of the cross-impact analysis technique in MICMAC 6.1.2 software, information analysis has been done with a futures research approach.
Findings: The studies in the spatial analysis of the components of physical resilience in Ilam city showed that 3975646 square meters, i.e. 68.28% of the total area, are in the range of relatively non-incurable to completely non-incurable and 321789 square meters, i.e. 53 / 5% of the total area is in the average equilibrium range. Key factors explaining the components of increasing physical resilience in Ilam in the future according to the current situation and the degree of the direct and indirect impact of variables on each other and the future trend of physical resilience in Ilam against earthquakes including ground, open space and penetration Susceptibility, population density, strength and structural strength, residential density, access, and land use.
Conclusion: The results of the spatial analysis show that the resilience of Ilam city is in a relatively unfavorable situation. In fact, 68% of the residential fabric of Ilam city is in the relatively uncompromising to completely unsustainable range. Also, the spatial structure of direct map stimuli The method of physical resilience at a rate of 100% in MICMAC software showed that among the 8 primary variables, 3 factors have a key effect on physical resilience in Ilam against earthquakes. These variables are bed ground, open space, and permeability. The results also show that the relationships of key factors are very influential.
Methodology: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method, which was conducted from 2020 to 2021 in Ilam. A total of 44 specialists in the field of resilience and futures research were selected by the available sampling method and purposefully participated in the study. For spatial analysis of physical resilience components, five indices of the building structure, material type, number of floors, granulation, and age of buildings were analyzed using Geoda 1.20.0.8 and ArcGIS 10.4.1 software. Continuation, using the Delphi technique and application of the cross-impact analysis technique in MICMAC 6.1.2 software, information analysis has been done with a futures research approach.
Findings: The studies in the spatial analysis of the components of physical resilience in Ilam city showed that 3975646 square meters, i.e. 68.28% of the total area, are in the range of relatively non-incurable to completely non-incurable and 321789 square meters, i.e. 53 / 5% of the total area is in the average equilibrium range. Key factors explaining the components of increasing physical resilience in Ilam in the future according to the current situation and the degree of the direct and indirect impact of variables on each other and the future trend of physical resilience in Ilam against earthquakes including ground, open space and penetration Susceptibility, population density, strength and structural strength, residential density, access, and land use.
Conclusion: The results of the spatial analysis show that the resilience of Ilam city is in a relatively unfavorable situation. In fact, 68% of the residential fabric of Ilam city is in the relatively uncompromising to completely unsustainable range. Also, the spatial structure of direct map stimuli The method of physical resilience at a rate of 100% in MICMAC software showed that among the 8 primary variables, 3 factors have a key effect on physical resilience in Ilam against earthquakes. These variables are bed ground, open space, and permeability. The results also show that the relationships of key factors are very influential.
Keywords:
References
1. Abdali Y, Rajaei SA (2020). Determining the components of physical resilience in the residential texture of Bojnourd City using Moran's I spatial autocorrelation. Journal of Urban Research and Planning. 10(39):1-16. [Persian] [Link]
2. Ahad Nejad Roshti M, Roustaei Sh, Kamelifar MJ (2015). Assessment of urban road network vulnerability against earthquake by crisis management approach case study: region1/Tabriz. Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 24(95):37-50. [Persian] [Link]
3. Alexander D (2011). Resilience against earthquakes: some practical suggestions for planners and managers. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. 13(2):109-115. [Link]
4. Beheshti MB, Zali N (2011). Identifying the key factors of regional development with a scenario-based planning approach: a case study of East Azerbaijan provinc. The Journal of Spatial Planning. 15(1):41-63. [Persian] [Link]
5. Cutter SL, BarnesL, Berry M, BurtonCh, Evans E, Tate E, et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change. 18(4):598-606. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013]
6. Faraji A, Nematpour M, Oshrieh O (2017). A systematic analysis of positive and negative effects of iran tourism development using a future study approach. Journal of Social Studied in Tourism. 5(9):151-189. [Persian] [Link]
7. Gasparini P, Manfredi G, Asprone D (2014). Resilience and sustainability in relation to natural disasters: a challenge for future cities. Berlin: Springer. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-04316-6]
8. Ghadiri M, Eftekhari AR, Parhizkar A, Shayan S (2012). Explaining the vulnerability of socio-spatial concentration of Tehran city in relation to earthquake. Spatial Planning (Modares Human Sciences). 16(3):31-54. [Persian] [Link]
9. Gharei F, Masnavi MR, Hajibande M (2017). Urban local-spatial resilience: developing the key indicators and measures, a brief review of literature. BAGH-E NAZAR. 14(57):19-32. [Persian] [Link]
10. Godschalk DR (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review. 4(3):136-143. [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)]
11. Kalantari Khalilabad H, Hataminejad H, Agha Safari A (2007). The vulnerability of the historical texture of yazd city to the earthquake. Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 16(61):54-60. [Persian] [Link]
12. Hataminejad H, Abdali Y, Allah Gholipour S (2018). Assessing the structural vulnerability of urban distressed areas against hazards with passive defense approach case study: central worn texture of Ahvaz metropolis. Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 26(104):159-172. [Persian] [Link]
13. Huck A, Monstadt J (2019). Urban and infrastructure resilience: diverging concepts and the need for cross-boundary learning. Environmental Science & Policy. 100:211-220. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008]
14. Ingalls ML, Stedman RC (2016). The power problematic: exploring the uncertain terrains of political ecology and the resilience framework. Ecology and Society. 21(1):6. [Link] [DOI:10.5751/ES-08124-210106]
15. Jabareen Y (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities. 31:220-229. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004]
16. Kaviani Rad M (2010). The spatial analysis of the environmental risks and ecological crises in Iran. Strategic Studies Quarterly. 13(2):33-57. [Persian] [Link]
17. Mahmoudzadeh A, Ghaazi A, Askari M (2017). Investigating and evaluating the worn-out texture of Ilam City with the approach of earthquake crisis management. Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 26(102):111-126. [Persian] [Link]
18. Maleki S, Amanpour S, Safaeepour M, Pourmousavi SN (2017). Evaluation of urban physical resilience spectrum the against earthquake using the model planning (a case study of Ilam). Physical Development Planning. 4(1):9-20. [Persian] [Link]
19. Maleki S, Amanpour S, Safaeepour M, Pormosavi SN, Mawaddat I (2018). Spectrum to evaluate the resilience of urban communities in against seismic crisis based on different earthquake scenarios using models μd and COPRAS (A Case Study of Ilam). Urban Research and Planning. 8(31):19-40.[Persian] [Link]
20. Manyena SB (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters. 30(4):433-450. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x]
21. Mohammadi A, Pashazadeh A (2017). Measurement of urban resilience against the risk of earthquake incidence case study: Ardebil city. Research in Earth Science. 8(2):112-126. [Persian] [Link]
22. Mavedat E, Garmsiri P, Momeni K (2020). Estimated distribution of urban resilience from the perspective of the earthquake crisis using the spatial stats model (case study of Ilam). Journal Regional Planning. 9(36):119 -134. [Persian] [Link]
23. Pourahmad A, Ziari K, Sadeghi A (2018). Spatial analysis of physical resilience components of urban attrited/beaten tissues against earthquakes (case study: district 10 of Tehran municipality). Journal of Spatial Planning. 8(1):111-130. [Persian] [Link]
24. Seeliger L, Turok I (2013). Towards sustainable cities: extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory. Sustainability. 5(5):2108-2128. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su5052108]
25. Shamsuddin S (2020). Resilience resistance: the challenges and implications of urban resilience implementation. Cities. 103:102763. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763]
26. Spaans M, Waterhout B (2017). Building up resilience in cities worldwide - rotterdam as participant in the 100 resilient cities programme. Cities. 61:109-116. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011]
27. Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change?. Ecology and Society. 9(2):10. [Link] [DOI:10.5751/ES-00667-090210]
28. Vale L, Shamsuddin S, Goh K (2014). Tsunami + 10: Housing banda aceh after disaster. Places Journal. Apr. [Link] [DOI:10.22269/141215]
29. Zhang L, Zhang Y, Chang M, Xu Y, Hao S, Liang G, et al (2019). Food-energy-water (FEW) nexus for urban sustainability: a comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 142:215-224. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.018]