Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 39, Issue 2 (2024)
GeoRes 2024, 39(2): 139-148 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2023/10/14 | Accepted: 2024/04/22 | Published: 2024/05/25
Received: 2023/10/14 | Accepted: 2024/04/22 | Published: 2024/05/25
How to cite this article
Morsousi N, Nasiri Hendehkhaleh E, Hosseini M. An Integrated Management Model of Spatial Data Infrastructure with a Smart City Approach in District 20 of Tehran. GeoRes 2024; 39 (2) :139-148
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1538-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1538-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
Abstract (791 Views)
Aims: District 20 of Tehran Municipality is characterized as a less developed region attributable to factors such as insufficient smart infrastructure and the absence of a coherent vision for smart city infrastructure advancement. The primary objective of this research was to develop a comprehensive management framework for spatial data infrastructure integrated with a smart city approach within District 20 of Tehran.
Methodology: This investigation, carried out between 2023 and 2024, was divided into qualitative and quantitative phases, with a particular focus on District 20 in Tehran. The study's sample size comprised 16 experts, and data collection methods encompassed semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. During the qualitative phase, the components essential for managing spatial data infrastructure in the context of a smart city were identified through an extensive review of existing literature. Subsequently, following adjustments based on expert feedback, a total of 12 components were validated. In the quantitative phase, structural equation modeling was employed to delineate the network of relationships and interactions, culminating in the presentation of the final model.
Findings: The formulation of policies for spatial data infrastructure was recognized as the most influential component at the highest echelon. Factors such as the utilization extent of spatial data, the quantity of electronic service centers, data update frequencies, cooperation and synchronization among the authorities of Rey Governorate, Rey Municipality, and Tehran Municipality in the realms of spatial data production, standardization, and distribution, along with the element of collaboration and synchronization with other entities categorized as data users, were positioned as influential components at the lowest tier.
Conclusion: The policies and criteria established within the domain of spatial data infrastructure possess the most significant influence on other elements.
Methodology: This investigation, carried out between 2023 and 2024, was divided into qualitative and quantitative phases, with a particular focus on District 20 in Tehran. The study's sample size comprised 16 experts, and data collection methods encompassed semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. During the qualitative phase, the components essential for managing spatial data infrastructure in the context of a smart city were identified through an extensive review of existing literature. Subsequently, following adjustments based on expert feedback, a total of 12 components were validated. In the quantitative phase, structural equation modeling was employed to delineate the network of relationships and interactions, culminating in the presentation of the final model.
Findings: The formulation of policies for spatial data infrastructure was recognized as the most influential component at the highest echelon. Factors such as the utilization extent of spatial data, the quantity of electronic service centers, data update frequencies, cooperation and synchronization among the authorities of Rey Governorate, Rey Municipality, and Tehran Municipality in the realms of spatial data production, standardization, and distribution, along with the element of collaboration and synchronization with other entities categorized as data users, were positioned as influential components at the lowest tier.
Conclusion: The policies and criteria established within the domain of spatial data infrastructure possess the most significant influence on other elements.
References
1. Ahmad T, Zhang D (2021). Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks. Sustainable Cities and Society. 68:102783. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783]
2. Alshuwaikhat HM, Aina YA, Binsaedan L (2022). Analysis of the implementation of urban computing in smart cities: A framework for the transformation of Saudi cities. Heliyon. 8(10):e11138. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11138]
3. Anejionu OCD, Thakuriah P, McHugh A, Sun Y, McArthur D, Mason P, et al (2019). Spatial urban data system: A cloud-enabled big data infrastructure for social and economic urban analytics. Future Generation Computer Systems. 98:456-473. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2019.03.052]
4. Chaturvedi K, Matheus A, Nguyen SH, Kolbe TH (2019). Securing spatial data infrastructures for distributed smart city applications and services. Future Generation Computer Systems. 101:723-736. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.002]
5. Cheng C, Dou J, Zheng Z (2022). Energy-efficient SDN for Internet of Things in smart city. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. 2:145-158. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.07.003]
6. Dangermond J, Goodchild MF (2020). Building geospatial infrastructure. Geo-Spatial Information Science. 23(1):1-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10095020.2019.1698274]
7. Daryabeigi Zand A, Vaezi Heir A (2020). Emerging challenges in urban waste management in Tehran, Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 162:105051. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105051]
8. Ghaderi M, Sadeghi Arj M (2019). Explaining a solution to achieve integrated urban management by using spatial information infrastructure (SDI) (emphasizing the importance of the issue in the urban management structure of Iran). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development Management in Iran. Tehran: University of Tehran. [Persian] [Link]
9. Habibi K, Ghanezadeh SM (2022). Pathology of integrated urban management with emphasis on the role of spatial data infrastructure The case study Sanandaj city. Geographical Urban Planning Research. 10(1):207-226. [Persian] [Link]
10. Hajduk S (2016). The concept of a smart city in urban management. Business, Management and Economics Engineering. 14(1):34-49. [Link] [DOI:10.3846/bme.2016.319]
11. Hu Y, Li W (2017). Spatial data infrastructures. The Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge. [Link] [DOI:10.22224/gistbok/2017.2.1]
12. Hussein NH, Yaw CT, Koh SP, Tiong SK, Chong KH (2022). A comprehensive survey on vehicular networking: Communications, applications, challenges, and upcoming research directions. IEEE Access. 10:86127-86180. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3198656]
13. Kirimtat A, Krejcar O, Kertesz A, Tasgetiren MF (2020). Future trends and current state of smart city concepts: A survey. IEEE Access. 8:86448-86467. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441]
14. Laufs J, Borrion H, Bradford B (2020). Security and the smart city: A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 55:102023. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102023]
15. Mahdizadeh M (2019). Investigating the relationship between the smart city and sustainable development and the challenges of achieving a sustainable smart city. Shabak. 5(7):119-128. [Persian] [Link]
16. Mattingly M (1995). Urban management in less developed countries. London: The Bartlett Development Planning Unit. Working Paper. No 72. [Link]
17. Mehrnezhad P, Shahbi Nezhad S (2013). Integrated management of urban development based on spatial data infrastructure (SDI). Proceedings of the First National Conference on Urban Development Over Time. Qazvin: Imam Khomeini International University. [Persian] [Link]
18. Modareszadeh Barzoki A, Banaie V, Mesgari MS, Sarvar R (2016). Explaining the spatial data infrastructure (SDI) approach in the information management of urban facilities in Tehran. National Geomatics Conference. [Persian] [Link]
19. Modarreszadeh Barzoki A, Sarvar R, Asadian F (2023). Pathology of the fulfillment of SDI establishment requirements and its strategies in Tehran Metropolitan Peri-Urban. Journal of Program and Development Research. 4(2):7-34. [Persian] [Link]
20. Monafi S, Sarai MH (2021). Assess integrated crisis management with a spatial data infrastructure approach. Urban Economics & Planning. 2(1):10-18. [Persian] [Link]
21. Mu R, Haershan M, Wu P (2022). What organizational conditions, in combination, drive technology enactment in government-led smart city projects?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 174:121220. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121220]
22. Pourahmad A, Ziyari K, Hataminejad H, Parsa S (2018). Smart city: Explaining the needs and requirements of Tehran city for smartness. New Perspectives in Human Geography (Human Geography). 10(2):1-22. [Persian] [Link]
23. Powner DA, Phillips C, Businsky CG, Epperson KL, Eyler R, Mingus J, et al (2015). Geospatial data: Progress needed on identifying expenditures, building and utilizing a data infrastructure, and reducing duplicative efforts. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. [Link]
24. Rieke M, Bigagli L, Herle S, Jirka S, Kotsev A, Liebig T, et al (2018). Geospatial IoT-The need for event-driven architectures in contemporary spatial data infrastructures. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 7(10):385. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijgi7100385]
25. Rui Y, Ban Y (2011). Urban growth modeling with road network expansion and land use development. In: Advances in cartography and GIScience. Heidelberg: Springer. 2:399-412. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-19214-2_27]
26. Schade S, Granell C, Vancauwenberghe G, Keßler C, Vandenbroucke D, Masser I, et al (2020). Geospatial information infrastructures. In: Guo H, Goodchild MF, Annoni A, editors. Manual of Digital Earth. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 161-190. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9915-3_5]
27. Simões P, Neto MC, Sarmento P, Barriguinha A (2023). Oeste smart region. Mapping. 32(211):50-61. [Link] [DOI:10.59192/mapping.395]
28. Statistical Center of Iran (2023). Statistical yearbook of Tehran province. Tehran: Statistical Information System of Tehran Province. [Persain] [Link]
29. Zanella A, Bui N, Castellani A, Vangelista L, Zorzi M (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 1(1):22-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328]