Bilingual
En/Fa
Geographical Research is Published in both Persian and English Full-text.
Volume 36, Issue 4 (2021)
GeoRes 2021, 36(4): 407-417 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/02/28 | Accepted: 2021/09/23 | Published: 2021/11/30
Received: 2021/02/28 | Accepted: 2021/09/23 | Published: 2021/11/30
How to cite this article
Mirheydar Turan S, Ostadi M, Mohamad Niaye Qaraee F, Ehsaee A. A New Approach to the Analysis of Visual-Perception Illusion on the Spatial Layout of Urban Elements. GeoRes 2021; 36 (4) :407-417
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1088-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1088-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
A New Approach to the Analysis of Visual-Perception Illusion on the Spatial Layout of Urban Elements
1- Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Optometry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Optometry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Full-Text (HTML) (10 Views)
Abstract
Aims: Visual illusions are the most common perceptual illusions, but in urban literature are less addressed. Therefore, the present study seeks to achieve a new approach to analyzing the visual illusion in the layout of urban space elements.
Methodology: This research was conducted in 2021 and included scientific-research articles in the field of visual error perception during the years 2000-2020. In this meta-method analysis, all Google ScienceDirect, research gate, and GoogleScholar were examined for classification into research data. 30 related articles were chosen. Design based on meta-method analysis, for perceiving the mechanism of visual error perception in the arrangement of urban elements and locating the focal point in the city, visual error "change the size-distance of urban landscapes", as a developmental and experimental method, in a sample of urban space with focal point and background Visually modeled using SketchUp 2017 software.
Findings: The main components of the methodology of the visual illusion studies were determined by using the metamethod combined method. Based on this methodology, a specific Visual illusion of the change of the size in 3d urban space and Landolt C visual acuity chart was modeled by using SketchUp software. The specific nature of this visual illusion w:as char:acterized, and the ability of the SketchUp software and the visual acuity chart of Landolt C in the analysis of the Visual illusion was determined.
Conclusion: A Turning and design point, namely point M, was presented By modeling the size perception illusion. Hence the focal point of urban space with comparison its background before and after point M is perceived differently. This point and its specific illusion create a specific potential for planning the urban spatial system and the dominance of focal points in specific tourism and memorial corridors.
Aims: Visual illusions are the most common perceptual illusions, but in urban literature are less addressed. Therefore, the present study seeks to achieve a new approach to analyzing the visual illusion in the layout of urban space elements.
Methodology: This research was conducted in 2021 and included scientific-research articles in the field of visual error perception during the years 2000-2020. In this meta-method analysis, all Google ScienceDirect, research gate, and GoogleScholar were examined for classification into research data. 30 related articles were chosen. Design based on meta-method analysis, for perceiving the mechanism of visual error perception in the arrangement of urban elements and locating the focal point in the city, visual error "change the size-distance of urban landscapes", as a developmental and experimental method, in a sample of urban space with focal point and background Visually modeled using SketchUp 2017 software.
Findings: The main components of the methodology of the visual illusion studies were determined by using the metamethod combined method. Based on this methodology, a specific Visual illusion of the change of the size in 3d urban space and Landolt C visual acuity chart was modeled by using SketchUp software. The specific nature of this visual illusion w:as char:acterized, and the ability of the SketchUp software and the visual acuity chart of Landolt C in the analysis of the Visual illusion was determined.
Conclusion: A Turning and design point, namely point M, was presented By modeling the size perception illusion. Hence the focal point of urban space with comparison its background before and after point M is perceived differently. This point and its specific illusion create a specific potential for planning the urban spatial system and the dominance of focal points in specific tourism and memorial corridors.
Keywords:
References
1. Blakeslee B, McCourt ME (2001). A multiscale spatial filtering account of the wertheimer-benary effect and the corrugated mondrian. Vision Research. 41(19):2487-2502. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00138-9]
2. Boring EG (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. [Link]
3. Burge J, Fowlkes CC, Banks MS (2010). Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(21):7269-7280. [Link] [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5551-09.2010]
4. Carmi N, Kimhi S (2015). Further than the eye can see: psychological distance and perception of environmental threats. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 21(8):2239-2257. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10807039.2015.1046419]
5. Chamilothori K, Wienold J, Andersen M (2019). Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. LEUKOS. 15(2-3):203-226. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/15502724.2017.1404918]
6. Chi MT, Yao CY, Zhang E, Lee TY (2014). Optical illusion shape texturing using repeated asymmetric patterns. The Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics. 30(6-8):809-819. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00371-014-0989-3]
7. Clouten NH (2011). On visual perception of a spatial environment. Architectural Science Review. 16(4):178-187. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00038628.1973.9697187]
8. de Wit MM, van der Kamp J, Withagen R (2015). Visual illusions and direct perception: Elaborating on Gibson's insights. New Ideas in Psychology. 36;1-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.07.001]
9. Đorđević Đ, Vujić G (2010). Visual illusion of the change of the size of architectural and urban objects observed upon a change of the observer's distance: Parameters that influence it phenomenologically. Spatium. (22):38-46. [Link] [DOI:10.2298/SPAT1022038D]
10. Dyde RT, Milner AD (2002). Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time. Experimental Brain Research. 144(4):518-527. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00221-002-1065-1]
11. Ervin S, Steinitz C (2003). Landscape visibility computation: necessary, but not sufficient. Environment and [Link] [DOI:10.1068/b2968]
12. Fermüller C, Malm H (2004). Uncertainty in visual processes predicts geometrical optical illusions. Vision Research. 44(7):727-749. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.038]
13. Furman M, Gur M (2012). And yet it moves: Perceptual illusions and neural mechanisms of pursuit compensation during smooth pursuit eye movements. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 36(1):143-151. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.005]
14. Ge S, Saito T, Wu JL, Iramina K (2006). A study on some optical illusions based upon the theory of inducing field. International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 30 Aug.-3 Sept. 2006, New York, NY, USA. Piscataway: IEEE. pp. 4205-4208 [Link] [DOI:10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259951]
15. Goto T, Uchiyama I, Imai A, Takahashi SY, Hanari T, Nakamura S, et al (2007). Assimilation and contrast in optical illusions. Japanese Psychological Research. 49(1):33-44. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00330.x]
16. Gregory RL (1997). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions B: Biological Sciences, 352(1358):1121-1127. [Link] [DOI:10.1098/rstb.1997.0095]
17. Grzeczkowski L, Clarke AM, Francis G, Mast FW, Herzog MH (2017). About individual differences in vision. Vision Research. 141:282-292. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2016.10.006]
18. Hubbard HV, Kimball T (1935). An introduction to the study of landscape design. New York: The Macmillan Company. [Link]
19. Ibbotson M, Krekelberg B (2011). Visual perception and saccadic eye movements. Current Opinion Neurobiol. 21(4):553-558. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.012]
20. Karim AR, Kojima H (2010). Configurational asymmetry in vernier offset detection. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 6:66-78. [Link] [DOI:10.2478/v10053-008-0077-1]
21. Kopiske KK, Cesanek E, Campagnoli C, Domini F (2017a). Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Vision Research. 136:21-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.004]
22. Kopiske KK, Bruno N, Hesse C, Schenk T, Franz VH (2017b). Do visual illusions affect grasping? Considerable progress in a scientific debate. A reply to Whitwell & Goodale, 2016. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 88, 210-215. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.012]
23. Khuu SK, Kim DD (2013). Using the kinetic Zollner illusion to quantify the interaction between form and motion information in depth. Vision Research. 83:48-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2013.02.017]
24. Lavrenteva S, Murakami I (2018). The ebbinghaus illusion in contrast-defined and orientation-defined stimuli. Vision Research. 148:26-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2018.04.006]
25. Lo C, Dinov I (2011). Investigation of optical illusions on the aspects of gender and age. UCLA USJ. 24. [Link]
26. Luchins AS, Luchins EH (2015). Isomorphism in Gestalt theory: Comparison of Wertheimer's and Kohler's concepts. Gestalt Theory. 21(3):208-234. [Link]
27. Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL, Hubel DH (2004). The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 5:229-240. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/nrn1348]
28. Melcher D, Colby CL (2008). Trans-saccadic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12(12):466-473. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.003]
29. Michaels CF (2000). Information, perception, and action: What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995)?. Ecological Psychology. 12(3):241-258. [Link] [DOI:10.1207/S15326969ECO1203_4]
30. Nijhuis S (2011). Visual research in landscape architecture. Research in urbanism Series. 2:103-145. [Link]
31. Oliver S (2006). Optical illusions and their causes: Examining differing explanations. AHS Capstone Projects. 7(2). [Link]
32. Peri Bader A (2015). A model for everyday experience of the built environment: The embodied perception of architecture. The Journal of Architecture. 20(2):244-267. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13602365.2015.1026835]
33. Rakcheeva T (2018). Metric properties of the visual illusion of intersection. International Conference of artificial intelligence, medical engineering, education. Berlin: Springer. pp. 323-332. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-12082-5_30]
34. Repton (1803). The theory and practice of landscape gardening. Nolen J, editor. Cambridge: The Riverside Press (Houghton Miffl in Company). [Link]
35. Shakibamanesh A, Alalhesabi M, Behzadfar M (2014). Modern urban design: from cue approach to practical optical illusions. NAQSHEJAHAN. 4(2). [Link]
36. Symeonidou I (2016). Anamorphic experiences in 3D space: Shadows, projections and other optical illusions. Nexus Network Journal. 18(3):779-797. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00004-016-0298-4]
37. Tseng CS, Lin CT, Lin CW, Wang JH (2012). Perceptual edges preservation conformal to human vision perception. IEEE 13th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration (IRI), 8-10 Aug. 2012, Las Vegas, NV, USA. Piscataway: IEEE. pp. 173-178. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/IRI.2012.6303007]
38. Wackermann J (2010). Geometric-optical illusions: a pedestrian's view of the phenomenal landscape. Proceedings of Fechner Day. 26:165-170. [Link]
39. Wang CF, Wang RWY (2013). A study on the actual implementation of the design methods of ambiguous optical illusion graphics. Unknown Publisher. [Link]