Volume 36, Issue 3 (2021)                   GeoRes 2021, 36(3): 253-261 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML

History

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Urban Planning, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran
2- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran
3- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University - Boroujerd Branch, Imam Khomeini University Complex, Yadegar Imam St., Navab Sq., Boroujerd, Iran Postal Code: 6915136111 (guplan@gmail.com)
Abstract   (1921 Views)
Aims: Urban regeneration seeks to solve the problems of neighborhood erosion through the improvement of worn and damaged areas. In the meantime, stimulus projects and development of urban regeneration are productive in order to restore prosperity and development to the desired areas to launch a cycle of lively and dynamic activity in these areas. The purpose of this study was to provide a model for evaluating development stimulus projects in urban regeneration.
Methodology: This applied qualitative research was conducted in 2020. Using a review of documents (articles, books, interviews, and lectures) related to development stimulus projects in the reconstruction of the dilapidated urban fabric in Persian in Iran, 2 documents were reviewed. The method of data analysis was qualitative analysis using content analysis and category coding.
Findings: The results of category categorization showed that the evaluation model of development stimulus projects had 5 dimensions including social, economic, physical, environmental, and sustainability dimensions. These dimensions consisted of several components, each of which corresponded to the needs of the inhabitants of the worn-out tissue and in line with the regeneration strategies of these tissues.
Conclusion: Development stimulus projects as a platform for social and economic functions promote socio-economic status in these contexts and increase the motivation to participate in the process of improvement and modernization in the local community and cause a desire in the sector. Private investments in tissue. In this way, it is necessary to use small-scale projects of job creation, participation of capital residents, the prosperity of small-scale activities, index, and multi-purpose and hybrid uses.
Keywords:

References
1. Abedi JH, Taslimi M, Faqihi A, Sheikhzadeh M (2012). Thematic analysis and thematic networks: a simple and efficient method for exploring patterns embedded in qualitative data municipalities). Strategic Management Thought (Management Thought). 5(2):151-198. [Persian] [Link]
2. Aeaini M, Ardestani Z. (2009). Reconstruction pyramid and people's participation criteria for evaluation of urban endogenous development programs. HOVIATSHAHR. 3(5):123-141. [Persian] [Link]
3. Aliakbari S, Musakazemi SM, Keshavarz M, Jalalvandi M (2020). Recognition of stimuli for redevelopment of urban neighborhoods (Case study: District 12 of Tehran). Geography of Urban Planning Research. 8(3):489-510. [Persian] [Link]
4. Alpopi C, Manole C (2013). Integrated urban regeneration, solution for cities revitalize. Procedia Economics and Finance. 6:178-185. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00130-5]
5. Azizi M, Bahara B. (2016). The role of flagship developments in the regeneration of inner city textures: the case study of Yazd city, Iran. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA MEMATI-VA-SHAHRSAZI. 22(4):5-16. [Persian] [Link]
6. Ertan T, Eğercioğlu Y (2016). Historic city center urban regeneration: case of Malaga and Kemeralti, Izmir. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 223:601-607. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.362]
7. Ghaffari A, Saberi H (2017). The role of development stimulus uses in recreating worn-out tissue (case study: Sheikh Suleiman Shahr Daran neighborhood). International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism of Contemporary Iran, Tehran. Tehran: Civilica. [Persian] [Link]
8. Habibi M, Ghaneh M (2020). Feasibility study of public art capabilities as a stimulus for development in the reconstruction of worn-out texture (Case study: Mazandaran crossroads neighborhood in Semnan City). Housing and Rural Environment. 39(170):83-98. [Link]
9. Jahanshahi M (2016). Recreation or renovation. Essays Urban Planning. (suppl 45). [Persian] [Link]
10. Khaksari A (2004). Economic revitalization of historic city centery. HAFT SHAHR. 1(15-16):124-133. [Persian] [Link]
11. Kiani A, Heidari F (2015). Evaluation of influential factors in the process of wear and tear of old urban tissues in order to modernize and improve (case study: Darab city). Environmental Management Quarterly. 9(34):27-44. [Persian] [Link]
12. Lee TH, Hsieh HP (2016). Indicators of sustainable tourism: a case study from a Taiwan's wetland. Ecological Indicators. 67:779-787. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.023]
13. Maghsoudi M, Habibi SM (2020). Urban Restoration: Definitions, Theories, Experiences, Global Charters and Resolutions, Urban Methods and Measures. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [Persian] [Link]
14. Morovvati N, Latifi G (2011). Investigation of social factors affecting the tendency of residents of worn-out tissues to modernization (case study: Imamzadeh Abdullah neighborhood of Tehran). Journal of Social Welfare and Development Planning. 4(10):187-226. [Persian] [Link]
15. Parizadi T, Zarei F, Moradi M (2017). Evaluation of urban development drivers in historical structure (Case study: historical context of Qom city). Urban Structure and Function Studies. 4 (15):7-31. [Persian] [Link]
16. Pendar H (2020). Framework for transforming the process of forming large-scale projects in historical contexts into a positive catalyst for development (Catalyst) - Case Study: Historical context of Najaf Ashraf. Journal of Islamic Architectural Research. 8(2):76-90. [Persian] [Link]
17. Pourahmad A, Habibi K, Keshavarz M (2010). The evolution of the concept of urban regeneration as a new approach in worn-out urban contexts. Iranian-Islamic City Studies Quarterly. (1):234-258. [Persian] [Link]
18. Sajjadzadeh H, Dalvand R, Hamidinia M. (2016). The role of regeneration in catalyst approach of ancient neighborhood (case study: haji neighborhood in Hamedan). HAFT SHAHR. 4(53-54):54-76. [Persian] [Link]
19. Sajjadzadeh H, Zolfigol S (2016). Role of urban design in regeneration of ancient district with catalyst approach case study: KOLAPA district in Hamedan. Quarterly Journal of Environmental based Territorial Planning. 8(31):147-171. [Persian] [Link]
20. Zarabi E, Tehrani SF (2009). Participatory approach in renovation and rehabilitation of deteriorated urban fabrics. ARMANSHAHR Architecture and Urban Development. 2(2):39-46. [Persian] [Link]