Bilingual
Volume 40, Issue 4 (2025)                   GeoRes 2025, 40(4): 371-379 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Sonbolestanian S, Tahmas Nezhad M. Role of Urban Services from the Perspective of Citizens in the Urban Prosperity Process of Isfahan Metropolis. GeoRes 2025; 40 (4) :371-379
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1876-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Dehaghan Campus (Deh.C.), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Tourism Research Center, Faculty of Humanities, Najafabad Campus (Na.C.), Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Dehaghan Campus, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza-Dehaghan Road, Dehaghan, Iran. Postal Code: 8641687511 (sh.sonbolestanian@iau.ir)
Abstract   (997 Views)
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the role of urban services in the urban prosperity process in the Isfahan metropolis and to identify the dimensions that have the greatest impact on promoting urban prosperity. In this regard, the relationship between the quality of urban services and the status of urban prosperity in different areas of the city was examined, and the key dimensions affecting prosperity were identified.
Methodology: The present study, conducted in 2025, employed a combined quantitative-qualitative approach among the citizens of the Isfahan metropolis. The sample size was estimated at 384 people using Cochran's formula. Sampling was done randomly and covered different urban areas. The data collection tool was a research-made questionnaire. The resulting data were entered into SPSS 22 and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Multivariate regression was used to examine the predictive role of urban service components on urban prosperity.
Findings: Urban services had a direct, positive, and significant effect on urban prosperity, and the dimensions of infrastructure, spatial justice, and governance had the greatest impact in explaining prosperity. Spatial inequality in access to services, weak critical infrastructure, limited citizen participation, and environmental challenges were the main obstacles to sustainable prosperity in Isfahan. Urban prosperity in Isfahan depended on the quality and justice in the provision of urban services.
Conclusion: Urban prosperity in Isfahan is multidimensional and unstable, and its promotion requires improving spatial justice, strengthening critical infrastructure, and developing participatory governance.
 
Keywords:

References
1. Abbasi H (2022). Investigation of city prosperity indicators in Khorramabad city. Human Geography Research. 54(2):599-615. [Persian] [Link]
2. Ansell C, Gash A (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 18(4):543-571. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/jopart/mum032]
3. Asadi A, Ahadnejad Roshti M (2025). Measurement of urban prosperity indicators in the middle cities of Iran (case study: Zanjan city). Journal of Geography and Planning. 28(90):46-62. [Persian] [Link]
4. Babaei Eliasi M, Karami Palengari Sh, Nakhjavani S, Mohammadpour S (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of urban prosperity on urban livability (case study: Rasht metropolis). Journal of Geography and Planning. 29(93):315-331. [Persian] [Link]
5. Bakker V, Verburg PH, Van Vliet J (2021). Trade-offs between prosperity and urban land per capita in major world cities. Geography and Sustainability. 2(2):134-138. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.004]
6. Campbell S (2016). The planner's triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can't stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association. 82(4):388-397. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080]
7. Clay L (2023). Sustainable flourishing in cities and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Developing a path through appreciative inquiry and SOAR framework for increasing innovative capacity and resilience. In: Maheshwari AK, editor. Consciousness-based leadership and management, Volume 2. Palgrave Studies in Workplace Spirituality and Fulfillment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-05839-4_14]
8. Daneshpour H, Saeidi Rezvani N, Bazrgar M (2020). Evaluation of the possibility of situating accessibility index among urban prosperity main indexes (Case Study of Shiraz City). Human Geography Research. 52(2):457-476. [Persian] [Link]
9. Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Olsson P, Gaffney O, et al (2019). Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature Sustainability. 2(4):267-273. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1]
10. Ghasemi K (2024). Enhancing urban livability: Analyzing Tehran through equitable land use distribution. Journal of Urban Management. 13(4):596-608. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jum.2024.06.005]
11. Habibpour N, Khalili A, Mahmoudi E (2025). Measuring of urban prosperity in urmia city neighbourhoods. region 4. Urban Economics and Planning. 5(3):20-41. [Persian] [Link]
12. Harvey D (2010). Social justice and the city. Georgia: University of Georgia Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/9780820336046]
13. Healey P (2005). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. [Link]
14. Kakavand A, Karampour S, Kakavand S (2025). Application of the City Prosperity Index (CPI) in urban evaluation, measurement, and ranking, case study: 22 regions of Tehran municipality in 2010, 2015 and 2020. Urban Economics and Planning. 5(4):118-139. [Persian] [Link]
15. Lynch K (2014). Good city form. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Link]
16. Marcuse P (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City. 13(2-3):185-197. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13604810902982177]
17. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 147:38-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011]
18. Narayanan A, Jenamani M, Mahanty B (2021). Determinants of sustainability and prosperity in Indian cities. Habitat International. 118:102456. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102456]
19. Pacione M (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing-a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning. 65(1-2):19-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7]
20. Parnell S, Robinson J (2012). (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography. 33(4):593-617. [Link] [DOI:10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593]
21. Rezaali M, Hataminejad H, Faraji-Sobkbar HA, Alavi SA, Quaid-Rahmati S (2020). explaining spatial pattern of urban flourishing indicators in Iran new approach to metropolitan sustainability study (a case study of Tehran Metropolis). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning. 15(1):281-294. [Persian] [Link]
22. Rezaei S, Aryan A, Mohammadpour S (2025). An analysis of the distribution of urban services with an emphasis on the spatial justice approach (case study: Mashhad City). Urban Economics and Planning. 6(1):96-117. [Persian] [Link]
23. Sellers JM, Lidström A (2007). Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance. 20(4):609-632. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x]
24. UN-Habitat (2013). State of women in cities 2012-2013: Gender and the prosperity of cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlement Programme. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203756171]