Bilingual
Volume 40, Issue 2 (2025)                   GeoRes 2025, 40(2): 143-149 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML Full-Text (HTML)


History

How to cite this article
Hoseini Lahoordi M, Nasiri A, Khezerlou P. Role of Urban Security Factors in Enhancing Women’s Presence in Public Urban Spaces in Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran. GeoRes 2025; 40 (2) :143-149
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1715-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahr-e-Qods Center (Sh.C.), Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Qods, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Enghelab squre, Vesal Street, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1478734787 (anasiri5173@gmail.com)
Abstract   (454 Views)
Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of urban security components in enhancing women's presence in public spaces along Keshavarz Boulevard in Tehran.
Methodology: This research was a quantitative study conducted in 2024 to examine the impact of urban security factors on women’s presence in public spaces in Keshavarz Boulevard. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. For data analysis, statistical tests including one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear regression model were applied in SPSS 27 to investigate the relationship between security components and women's spatial presence.
Findings: The one-way ANOVA results indicated that only three indicators (spatial design and physical form, past experiences of insecurity, and gender perception in space) had significant differences across age groups, while the other parameters did not. The Pearson correlation test revealed a significant and positive relationship between physical, social, and mental dimensions of security and women's spatial presence, with the highest correlations found for urban cleanliness and spatial design. Regression analysis further confirmed that the physical (79%), social (56%), and mental (64.9%) dimensions had a substantial explanatory power regarding women's presence in urban spaces.
Conclusion: The physical, social, and mental aspects of urban security significantly influence women's participation in public spaces. Specifically, environmental design, cleanliness, and subjective experiences of insecurity play a major role.
Keywords:

References
1. Beebeejaun Y (2009). Making safer places: Gender and the right to the city. Security Journal. 22(3):219-229. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/sj.2009.4]
2. Carmona M (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International. 24(1):47-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3]
3. Datta A, Ahmed N (2020). Intimate infrastructures: The rubrics of gendered safety and urban violence in Kerala, India. Geoforum. 110:67-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.016]
4. Foster S, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M (2010). Neighbourhood design and fear of crime: A social-ecological examination of the correlates of residents' fear in new suburban housing developments. Health & Place. 16(6):1156-1165. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.07.007]
5. Foster S, Hooper P, Knuiman M, Bull F, Giles-Corti B (2016). Are liveable neighbourhoods safer neighbourhoods? Testing the rhetoric on new urbanism and safety from crime in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine. 164:150-157. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.013]
6. Foster S, Wood L, Christian H, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B (2013). Planning safer suburbs: Do changes in the built environment influence residents' perceptions of crime risk?. Social Science & Medicine. 97:87-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.010]
7. Ghodsi AM, Naghdi A, Roueentan M (2017). Women mental imagine and objective experience on security (case study: Women working in the unofficial sector of Hamadan Town). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran. 6(2):285-306. [Persian] [Link]
8. Kallus R, Churchman A (2004). Women's struggle for urban safety. The Canadian experience and its applicability to the Israeli context. Planning Theory & Practice. 5(2):197-215. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14649350410001691754]
9. Karimi F, Karami I, Dehghanmongabadi A (2024). Examining the physical role of the environment in the social security of women in the urban public spaces under study: Varamin city parks. Safe City. 7(3):69-88. [Persian] [Link]
10. Mahadevia D, Lathia S (2019). Women's safety and public spaces: Lessons from the Sabarmati riverfront, India. Urban Planning. 4(2):154-168. [Link] [DOI:10.17645/up.v4i2.2049]
11. Mehta V (2019). Space, time, and agency on the Indian street. In: The Palgrave handbook of bottom-up urbanism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 239-253. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-90131-2_15]
12. Mehta V, Nogalski S (2024). Suburban camouflage in urban neighbourhoods: New building typologies and their impact on social life of residential streets. Journal of Urban Design. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2024.2399537]
13. Mohammadi Birang M, Azar A (2019). Analyzing women's sense of security in public spaces with emphasis on urban parks. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches. 10(20):27-40. [Persian] [Link]
14. Navarrete-Hernandez P, Luneke A, Truffello R, Fuentes L (2023). Planning for fear of crime reduction: Assessing the impact of public space regeneration on safety perceptions in deprived neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning. 237:104809. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104809]
15. Roberts M (1998). Urban design, gender and the future of cities. Journal of Urban Design. 3(2):133-135. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13574809808724421]
16. Roosta M, Ahmadi P (2019). Evaluating the impact of environmental factors on women's sense of safety (case study: Sahlabad neighborhood- Shiraz). Strategic Research on Social Problems. 8(1):85-96. [Persian] [Link]
17. Roy S, Bailey A (2021). Safe in the city? Negotiating safety, public space and the male gaze in Kolkata, India. Cities. 117:103321. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103321]
18. Salehi Z, Hosseini SH (2021). The investigating environmental factors affecting women's sense of security in Sabzevar. Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society. 12(47):205-222. [Persian] [Link]
19. Shariati Mazinani S, Foroghzadeh S (2017). Urban public spaces and women security: The case study of Mashhad. Strategic Research on Social Problems. 6(4):71-90. [Persian] [Link]
20. Taylor RB, Haberman CP, Groff ER (2019). Urban park crime: Neighborhood context and park features. Journal of Criminal Justice. 64:101622. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101622]
21. Trench S, Oc T, Tiesdell S (1992). Safer cities for women: Perceived risks and planning measures. Town Planning Review. 63(3):279. [Link] [DOI:10.3828/tpr.63.3.r16862416261h337]
22. Putra D, Salim WA, Indradjati PN, Prilandita N (2023). Understanding the position of urban spatial configuration on the feeling of insecurity from crime in public spaces. Frontiers in Built Environment. 9:1114968. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1114968]
23. Yaran A, Arjomandi H, Mesgarian M (2019). Investigating the contribution of physical components of women's sense of safety to open spaces of urban tourism, case study: 30 Tir street. MANZAR. 11(47):24-37. [Persian] [Link]
24. Zavadskas EK, Bausys R, Mazonaviciute I (2019). Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making. Landscape and Urban Planning. 189:372-381. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.014]