Persian
Volume 39, Issue 3 (2024)                   GeoRes 2024, 39(3): 387-398 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Rezaeeparto K. Vulnerability of the Southern Areas of Tehran City to Earthquake Using Layer Overlay System. GeoRes 2024; 39 (3) :387-398
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1639-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
Authors K. Rezaeeparto *
Earth Science Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Chogan Boulevard, Lashkari bypass, Sadra town, West of Azadi Complex Boulevard, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: - (rezaeepartok@ripi.ir)
Abstract   (385 Views)
Aims: This study aims to assess and map the vulnerability of southern Tehran districts to earthquakes.
Methodology: The research, applied in nature, was conducted across the southern districts of Tehran (Districts 9 to 20). It followed a developmental approach in three phases. First, confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to develop vulnerability indices. In the second phase, a fuzzy Delphi technique was employed to prioritize these indices. Finally, the most impactful factors influencing urban fabric vulnerability were weighted and visualized as geospatial layers using ArcGIS software (Version 9.2). The vulnerability of the study area was then assessed by overlaying these layers, leading to the development of a final vulnerability map based on seismic-related physical indicators.
Findings: The research, applied in nature, was conducted in 2024 across the southern districts of Tehran (Districts 9 to 20). It followed a developmental approach in three phases. First, confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to develop vulnerability indices. In the second phase, a fuzzy Delphi technique was employed to prioritize these indices. Finally, the most impactful factors influencing urban fabric vulnerability were weighted and visualized as geospatial layers using ArcGIS software (Version 9.2). The vulnerability of the study area was then assessed by overlaying these layers, leading to the development of a final vulnerability map based on seismic-related physical indicators.
Conclusion: The heightened vulnerability of southern Tehran districts is attributed to poor structural conditions, inappropriate land use, ineffective transportation networks, dense and deteriorated urban fabric, high population density, inadequate distribution of medical and emergency facilities, and insufficient access to well-distributed urban open spaces. Addressing these challenges is critical to mitigating potential earthquake damage in urban areas.
Keywords:

References
1. Ahadnejad M, Tahmasebi Moghaddam H, Heydari MT, Teymouri A (2021). An analysis of the metamorphosis spatial organization of the urban system of Zanjan province. Journal of Regional Planning. 11(42):63-80. [Persian] [Link]
2. Akhani M, Kashani AR, Mousavi M, Gandomi AH (2019). A hybrid computational intelligence approach to predict spectral acceleration. Measurement. 138:578-589. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.054]
3. Alinia H, Khatib MM (2021). Investigation of seismic parameters, calculation of seismic moment and geologic moment Kopeh-Dagh zone in Northeast of Iran. Journal of Natural Environment Hazards. 10(27):177-196. [Persian] [Link]
4. Azim MT, Islam MM (2016). Earthquake preparedness of households in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: AS perceptual study. Environmental Hazards. 15(3):189-208. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17477891.2016.1173006]
5. Behrouzi H, Zand Moghadam MR, Kamyabi S (2022). Modeling the resilience of the city against natural hazards with emphasis on landslide (case study: Ghaemshahr city). Geographical Research. 37(3):339-349. [Persian] [Link]
6. Borja J (2007). Counterpoint: Intelligent cities and innovative cities. Barcelona: UOC Open University of Catalonia; 5. [Link]
7. Burton HV, Sreekumar S, Sharma M, Sun H (2017). Estimating aftershock collapse vulnerability using mainshock intensity, structural response and physical damage indicators. Structural Safety. 68:85-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.009]
8. Cao L, Laflamme S (2017). Real-time variable multidelay controller for multihazard mitigation. Journal of Engineering Mechanic. 144(2). [Link] [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001406]
9. Chelidze T, Zhukova N, Matcharashvili T (2018). Phase space portraits of earthquake time series of caucasus: Signatures of strong earthquake preparation. In: Complexity of seismic time series: Measurement and application. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 419-436. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-813138-1.00012-2]
10. Deakin M (2013). From intelligent to smart cities. In: Smart cities: Governing, modelling and analysing the transition. London: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203076224]
11. Deakin M, Allwinkle S (2007). Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: The role of networks, innovation and creativity in building successful partnerships. Journal of Urban Technology. 14(1):77-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10630730701260118]
12. Dutta V (2012). War on the dream-How land use dynamics and peri-urban growth characteristics of a sprawling city devour the master plan and urban suitability? A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach. Proceeded of the 13th Global Development Conference. Budapest: Global Development Network. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0975425312473226]
13. Ehsani M, Bahmanpour H (2018). Underground transportation system risk assessment to mitigate vulnerability against natural disasters through intelligent urban management. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management. 3(3):179-192. [Link]
14. Fahim Danesh S, Hafezi M, Sadeghi H, Ghafori M (2017). Investigation of earthquake and earthquake hazard in buildings of Tehran city in a probabilistic way. Urban Management. 16(3):99-106. [Persian] [Link]
15. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio. 31(5):437-440. [Link] [DOI:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437]
16. Gil-García J, Pardo TA (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly. 22(2):187-216. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001]
17. Goltz JD, Bourque LB (2017). Earthquakes and human behavior: A sociological perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 21:251-265. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.007]
18. Habibi K, Ezzati M, Torabi K, Ezatpanah B (2017). Investigating the urban vulnerability against earthquake using MIHWP model-case study: 10th zone of Tabriz. Journal of Geography and Planning. 20(58):101-118. [Persian] [Link]
19. Habibi K, Rahimi A (2013). Asseeement of land use ecological footprint in an Iranian small city. ARMANSHAHR. 5(10):191-200. [Persian] [Link]
20. Habibi SM, Hosseinzadeh M (2021). Social and cultural challenges of managing vulnerable urban textures (case study: Hasir Foroushan neighborhood from the old texture of Babol). HOVIATESHAHR. 15(46):45-58. [Persian] [Link]
21. Hollands RG (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up?. City. 12(3):303-320. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13604810802479126]
22. Houshyar H, Ramazantash Dehgorje H (2022). The status QUO analysis of the buildings vulnerability in the city of Oshnavieh to earthquake. Geographical Research. 37(2):189-199. [Persian] [Link]
23. Jahankhah M, Delavar MR, Moshiri B, Zare M (2012). Tehran seismic vulnerability assessment due to the north city fault by a multi attribute decision making approach based on evidential reasoning. Geosciences. 22(85):159-166. [Persian] [Link]
24. Janssena MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K (2006). Scholarly network on resilience vulnerability and adaption within the human dimensions of global environment change. Global Environmental Change. 16(3):240-252. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.001]
25. León J, March A (2014). Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat International. 43:250-262. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006]
26. Liang Y, Cheng J, Ruzek JI, Liu Z (2019). Posttraumatic stress disorder following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: A 10-year systematic review among highly exposed populations in China. Journal of Affective Disorders. 243:327-339. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.047]
27. Lotfi H, Noori Kermani A, Ziari K (2022). Spatial analysis of physical resilience components of Ilam City against earthquake with a futuristic approach. Geographical Research. 37(1):141-153. [Persian] [Link]
28. Mirhosseini SF, Hajebrahim Zargar A, Motavaf S (2020). An assessment of the vulnerability of Tehran's Farahzad district in a possible earthquake. SOFFEH. 30(90):95-112. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/soffeh.30.3.95]
29. Moehle J, Barkley C, Boniwitz D, Karlinsky S, Maffei J, Polland C (2009). The resilient city-A way of thinking about preparedness, mitigation, and rebuilding. Proceedings of the NZSEE Conference. Wellington: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. [Link]
30. Moradi Tayebi F, Motaghed S, Dastanian R (2020). Nature evaluation and time series prediction of Tehran earthquakes. Quranic Knowledge Research. 20(3):147-160. [Persian] [Link]
31. Shieh E, Habibi K, Ehsani M (2020). Risk assessment of Tehran subway stations during earthquakes with an approach to reduce physical vulnerability through intelligent urban management (case study: Tajrish, Darvazeh Shemiran, and Navab subway stations). Iranian Architechture and urbanism. 11(19):209-229. [Persian] [Link]
32. UN HABITAT (2003). The challenge of slums-global report on human settlements. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme. [Link]
33. UNDP-BCPR (2015). Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. New York: United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery. [Link]
34. Zheng YG, Huang J, Sun YH, Sun JQ (2018). Building vibration control by active mass damper with delayed acceleration feedback: Multi-objective optimal design and experimental validation. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 140(4):041002. [Link] [DOI:10.1115/1.4038955]