Persian
Volume 39, Issue 3 (2024)                   GeoRes 2024, 39(3): 279-287 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Rafiee G, Maleki A, Shahbazi Y, Molaei A. Urban Epidemiological Resilience Modeling Based on PLS Structural Equations, Tabriz, Iran. GeoRes 2024; 39 (3) :279-287
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1609-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, New Arg Street, Tabriz, Iran. Postal Code: 5137753497 (a.maleki@tabriziau.ac.ir)
Abstract   (440 Views)
Aims: Throughout the preceding century, the proliferation of pandemics, including Sars, Ebola, and notably Corona, has precipitated numerous crises within the global context. In addressing such urban challenges, the exploration of urban resilience and the implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions against epidemics may present a viable pathway. Accordingly, this study was undertaken to examine the influence of urban physical structure indicators on urban epidemiological resilience.
Methodology: The current study was of a practical nature and was carried out in Tabriz from early April to late June 2019, utilizing data pertinent to the Corona virus. Relevant indicators were derived from an exhaustive systematic literature review. Subsequently, the identified indicators were assessed using available statistics from 41 urban districts of Tabriz, and the resultant data were analyzed through the structural equation modeling approach to ascertain the interrelationships among the variables.
Findings: The determinants pertaining to food accessibility and the inadequacies in quarantine protocols, in conjunction with access to healthcare services, demographic and residential density, as well as social and environmental pollution, exhibited coefficients of 0.537, 0.488, 0.273, 0.232, and 0.146 respectively, thereby demonstrating a substantial influence on urban epidemiological resilience.
Conclusion: A considerable proportion of the variations observed in the epidemic is elucidated through the analysis of the parameters related to demographic and residential density, food accessibility and quarantine inadequacies, healthcare service availability, and both environmental and social pollution.
 
Keywords:

References
1. Abbasi J, Chinesaz Sh (2012). Factors affecting the benevolence of wealth management service providers from the point of view of wealthy clients. Journal of Business Management. 5(19):85-101. [Persian] [Link]
2. AbouKorin SAA, Han H, Mahran MGN (2021). Role of urban planning characteristics in forming pandemic resilient cities-case study of Covid-19 impacts on European cities within England, Germany and Italy. Cities. 118:103324. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324]
3. Alam MS, Sultana R (2021). Influences of climatic and non-climatic factors on COVID-19 outbreak: A review of existing literature. Environmental Challenges. 5:100255. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100255]
4. Alidadi M, Sharifi A (2022). Effects of the built environment and human factors on the spread of COVID-19: A systematic literature review. Science of the Total Environment. 850:158056. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158056]
5. Azuma K, Yanagi U, Kagi N, Kim H, Ogata M, Hayashi M (2020). Environmental factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 transmission: Effect and role of indoor environmental quality in the strategy for COVID-19 infection control. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 25:66. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12199-020-00904-2]
6. Barclay D, Higgins C, Thompson R (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer use as an Illustration. Technology Studies. 2(2):283-309. [Link]
7. Brakefield WS, Olusanya OA, White B, Shaban-Nejad A (2023). Social determinants and indicators of COVID-19 among marginalized communities: A scientific review and call to action for pandemic response and recovery. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 17:e193. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/dmp.2022.104]
8. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 395(10227):912-920. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8]
9. Coker ES, Cavalli L, Fabrizi E, Guastella G, Lippo E, Parisi ML, et al (2020). The effects of air pollution on COVID-19 related mortality in northern Italy. Environmental and Resource Economics. 76(4):611-634. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10640-020-00486-1]
10. Cronbach LJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16(3):297-334. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02310555]
11. Davari A, Rezazadeh A (2017). Structural equation modeling with software, PLS. 2nd edition. Tehran: Jihad Academic Press. [Persian] [Link]
12. Domingo JL, Rovira J (2020). Effects of air pollutants on the transmission and severity of respiratory viral infections. Environmental Research. 187:109650. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109650]
13. Fahy JV, Dickey BF (2010). Airway mucus function and dysfunction. The New England Journal of Medicine. 363(23):2233-2247. [Link] [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra0910061]
14. Fokkens WJ, Scheeren RA (2000). Upper airway defence mechanisms. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews. 1(4):336-341. [Link] [DOI:10.1053/prrv.2000.0073]
15. Gargiulo C, Gaglione F, Guida C, Papa R, Zucaro F, Carpentieri G (2020). The role of the urban settlement system in the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. The Italian case. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. Special Issue Covid-19 vs City-20. 189-212. [Link]
16. Gillings MR, Gaze WH, Pruden A, Smalla K, Tiedje JM, Zhu YG (2015). Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. The ISME Journal. 9(6):1269-1279. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/ismej.2014.226]
17. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 19(2):139-152. [Link] [DOI:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202]
18. Helm D (2020). The environmental impacts of the Coronavirus. Environmental and Resource Economics. 76:21-38. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10640-020-00426-z]
19. Holgate ST (2011). The sentinel role of the airway epithelium in asthma pathogenesis. Immunological Reviews. 242(1):205-219. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01030.x]
20. Honigsbaum M (2019). The pandemic century: One hundred years of panic, hysteria and hubris. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. [Link]
21. Huang X, Yang Q, Yang J (2021). Importance of community containment measures in combating the COVID-19 epidemic: From the perspective of urban planning. Geo-spatial Information Science. 24(3):363-371. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10095020.2021.1894905]
22. Hussein HAA (2022). Investigating the role of the urban environment in controlling pandemics transmission: Lessons from history. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 13(6):101785. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101785]
23. Jacobsen KH (2020). Will COVID-19 generate global preparedness?. Lancet. 395(10229):1013-1014. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30559-6]
24. Klemeš JJ, Van Fan Y, Tan RR, Jiang P (2020). Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 127:109883. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109883]
25. Kumar S, Singh R, Kumari N, Karmakar S, Behera M, Siddiqui AJ, et al (2021). Current understanding of the influence of environmental factors SARS-CoV-2 transmission, persistence, and infectivity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(6):6267-6288. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-12165-1]
26. Lak A, Sharifi A, Badr S, Zali A, Maher A, Mostafavi E, et al (2021). Spatio-temporal patterns of the COVID-19 pandemic, and place-based influential factors at the neighborhood scale in Tehran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 72:103034. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103034]
27. Lata K, Thapa K, Rajput AS (2021). Liveability of Indian cities and spread of COVID-19--case of tier-1 cities. Indian Journal of Public Administration. 67(3):365-382. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/00195561211038063]
28. Li X, Zhou L, Jia T, Peng R, Fu X, Zou Y (2020). Associating COVID-19 severity with urban factors: A case study of Wuhan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(18):6712. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186712]
29. Lin W (2020). Evental infrastructure: Momentous geographies of technoscience production. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 110(6):1770-1786. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/24694452.2020.1724766]
30. Ma S, Li S, Zhang J (2021). Diverse and nonlinear influences of built environment factors on COVID-19 spread across townships in China at its initial stage. Scientific Reports. 11:12415. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-91849-1]
31. Martin PJ, Billet S, Landkocz Y, Fougère B (2021). Inflammation at the crossroads: The combined effects of COVID-19, ageing, and air pollution. The Journal of Frailty & Aging. 10(3):281-285. [Link] [DOI:10.14283/jfa.2021.8]
32. Mohsenin Sh, Esfidani MR (2016). Structural equations based on partial least squares approach with the help of educational and practical SMART-PLS software. 2nd edition. Tehran: Mehraban Publisher. [Persian] [Link]
33. Nasiri R, Akbarpour S, Zali AR, Khodakarami N, Boochani M, Noory A, et al (2022). Spatio-temporal analysis of COVID-19 incidence rate using GIS: A case study-Tehran metropolitan, Iran. GeoJournal. 87(4):3291-3305. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10708-021-10438-x]
34. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, et al (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery. 78:185-193. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018]
35. Ozili PK, Arun T (2020). Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the global economy [Preprint]. S & P Global Market Intelligence [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3562570. [Link] [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3562570]
36. Paital B (2020). Nurture to nature via COVID-19, a self-regenerating environmental strategy of environment in global context. Science of the Total Environment. 729:139088. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139088]
37. Public Relations of Management and Planning Organization of East Azarbaijan Province (PRMPO) (2016). The performance report of the management and planning organization of East Azerbaijan province in 2016: Along with the operational plan for 2017. Tabriz: Management and Planning Organization of East Azarbaijan Province. [Persian] [Link]
38. Qiu Y, Chen X, Shi W (2020). Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Journal of Population Economics. 33(4):1127-1172. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00148-020-00778-2]
39. Reyes R, Ahn R, Thurber K, Burke TF (2013). Urbanization and infectious diseases: General principles, historical perspectives, and contemporary challenges. In: Fong IW, editor. Challenges in infectious diseases. New York: Springer. p. 123-146. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-4496-1_4]
40. Rojas-Rueda D, Morales-Zamora E (2021). Built environment, transport, and COVID-19: A review. Current Environment Health Reports. 8(2):138-145. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40572-021-00307-7]
41. Sharifi A, Khavarian-Garmsir AR (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science Total Environment. 749:142391. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391]
42. Teller J (2021). Urban density and COVID-19: Towards an adaptive approach. Buildings and Cities. 2(1):150-165. [Link] [DOI:10.5334/bc.89]
43. United Nations (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. New York: United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. [Link]
44. Valsamatzi-Panagiotou A, Penchovsky R (2022). Environmental factors influencing the transmission of the coronavirus 2019: A review. Environment Chemistry Letters. 20:1603-1610. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10311-022-01418-9]
45. Verma R, Yabe T, Ukkusuri SV (2021). Spatiotemporal contact density explains the disparity of COVID-19 spread in urban neighborhoods. Scientific Reports. 11:10952. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-90483-1]
46. Weaver AK, Head JR, Gould CF, Carlton EJ, Remais JV (2022). Environmental factors influencing COVID-19 incidence and severity. Annual Review of Public Health. 43:271-291. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052120-101420]
47. WHO (2024). WHO COVID-19 dashboard [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2024 Apr 20]. Available from: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c. [Link]
48. Wu T (2021). The socioeconomic and environmental drivers of the COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Ambio. 50(4):822-833. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s13280-020-01497-4]
49. Xu G, Jiang Y, Wang S, Qin K, Ding J, Liu Y, et al (2022). Spatial disparities of self- reported COVID-19 cases and influencing factors in Wuhan, China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 76:103485. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103485]
50. Yip TL, Huang Y, Liang C (2021). Built environment and the metropolitan pandemic: Analysis of the COVID-19 spread in Hong Kong. Building and Environment. 188:107471. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107471]
51. Zhang H, Liu Y, Chen F, Mi B, Zeng L, Pei L (2021). The effect of sociodemographic factors on COVID-19 incidence of 342 cities in China: A geographically weighted regression model analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 21:428. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06128-1]