Persian
Volume 39, Issue 2 (2024)                   GeoRes 2024, 39(2): 177-186 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Analytical Review |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Marzdar M, Farajirad A, Yousefi A, Ghorbaninezhad R. Analysis of the Geopolitical Factors Contributing to the Emergence of Religious Fundamentalist Groups and Their Impact on Regional Security in the Islamic Republic of Iran. GeoRes 2024; 39 (2) :177-186
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1600-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Political Geography, Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Political Geography, Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran & Department of Political Geography, Sciences and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Daneshgah Square, Shahid Hasarak Boulevard, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1477893855 (a.farajirad@yahoo.com)
Abstract   (673 Views)
Aims: The presence of a notable and conflicting connection between the Shiite-Sunni geopolitics within the Islamic world, as they vie for leadership of the Islamic world, and the geopolitical rivalries among regional nations and global powers in the Middle East, has had an impact on the patterns and aspects of regional security. This influence has been further compounded by the rise and expansion of religious fundamentalist groups, such as ISIS. This article initially elucidates the geopolitical origins behind the establishment of Salafi Islamic extremist factions, with a particular focus on the rise and existence of ISIS in the area. Subsequently, an analysis is conducted on the impact of the aforementioned phenomenon on the regional security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The primary focus of this study is to examine the geopolitical factors that contribute to the emergence of religious fundamentalist groups and assess their influence on the regional security of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Conclusion: The historical and identity backgrounds in state-building and incomplete modernization in influential geographical areas play a significant role in shaping the formation of religious fundamentalist groups. These findings are based on explanatory and analytical methods that investigate the cause-and-effect relationship between two independent and dependent variables in geopolitics. The geopolitical rivalry among regional entities and global powers is also a significant determinant. These groups have presented problems to the regional security of Iran by establishing their radical ideology in specific territories, affecting Iran's geopolitical, geostrategic, and geocultural spheres.
Keywords:

References
1. Afzali R, Mirzadeh Koohshahi M (2014). Geopolitical explanation of not establishing democracy in Bahrain. A Quarterly for Shi'a Studies. 12(48):75-102. [Persian] [Link]
2. Alsaafin L (2017). What is behind the covert Israeli-Saudi relations? [Internet]. Doha: ALJAZEERRA [cited 2017 Nov 21]. Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/11/21/what-is-behind-the-covert-israeli-saudi-relations/. [Link]
3. Barzegar K (2012). Arab developments and the balance of power in the Middle East [Internet]. Tehran: Middle East Center for Scientific Research and Strategic Studies [cited 2012 Oct 13]. Available from: https://www.cmess.ir/Page/View/2012-10-13/712. [Persian] [Link]
4. Buzan B (1997). National security, modern and postmodern governments. National Security. (1):11-35. [Persian] [Link]
5. Buzan B, Waever O (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511491252]
6. Cohen SB (1973). Geography and politics in a world divided. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link]
7. Cohen SB (2002). Geopolitics of the world system. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [Link]
8. Edwards LM (2010). State-building in Afghanistan: A case showing the limits?. International Review of the Red Cross. 92(880). [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S1816383111000099]
9. Enayat H (2006). A survey of Arab political thought from Napoleon's attack on Egypt to World War II. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.1201/9781439865873]
10. Esfandiary D, Tabatabai A (2015). Iran's ISIS policy. International Affairs. 91(1):1-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1468-2346.12183]
11. Esmaieli HR (2007). Recognizing Al-Qaeda's political thought. Encyclopedia of the World of Islam. 8(30-31):7-29. [Persian] [Link]
12. Ghamat J (2009). The position of the Middle East in geopolitical thoughts. Encyclopedia. 2(1):91-100. [Persian] [Link]
13. Hafeznia MR, Mirzaietabar M (2020). Geopolitical explanation of the religious and religious conflicts of the zero to 15° North African belt (since 1991). Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World. 10(1):155-191. [Persian] [Link]
14. Hafeznia MR, Ahmadi Pour Z, Booye C (2013). Islamic revolution of Iran and occurrence Iran's new "geopolitics". A Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal on Islamic Revolution. 2(5):1-23. [Persian] [Link]
15. Hossein F (2005). Sarqawi: The second generation of the base. Michigan: University of Michigan. [Link]
16. Huntington S (1996). Political order in societies undergoing transformation. Salasi M, translator. Tehran: ELM Publication. [Persian] [Link]
17. Huntington S (2003). The clash of civilization and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster Publisher. [Link]
18. Jafari F (2017). Terrorism and the benefit of great powers [Internet]. Tehran: Shargh Newspaper [cited 2017 Aug 6]. Available from: https://www.magiran.com/article/3605196. [Persian] [Link]
19. Hemmer C, Katzenstein P (2002). Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization. 56(3):575-607. [Link] [DOI:10.1162/002081802760199890]
20. Kaviani Rad M, Aazami H, Rasouli M, Bakhshi A (2018). Explaining the territoriality of fundamentalist organizations in fragile states (case study: ISIS in Libya). Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences. 18(50):105-127. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jgs.18.50.105]
21. Khalili R (2017). Iran's strategy towards ISIS: A theoretical approach. Cultural, Economic, Social Issues, General Information Quarterly in English. 11(3):55. [Link]
22. Khosravi A, Zarei G (2019). Position of ISIS in security of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Gulf cooperation council in the Middle East. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World. 9(2):107-129. [Persian] [Link]
23. Mashreghnews.ir (2014). The unity of Shi'a and Sunni scholars in confronting the Baathist-Takfiri sedition [Internet]. Tehran: Mashregh News [cited 2014 Jun 22]. Available from: http://www.mashreghnews.ir/fa/news/319792 [Persian] [Link]
24. Milani M (2006). The formation of the Islamic revolution from the Pahlavi dynasty to the Islamic Republic. Tehran: GAM-E NO. [Persian] [Link]
25. Mohseni S, Ghasemi F, Jamshidi MH, Soltaninejad A (2019). The evolution of the global geopolitical structure and the unilateral deterrence of the United States (centered on Saudi Arabia). International Quarterly of Geopolitics. 15(54):146-172. [Persian] [Link]
26. Pillalamarri A (2015). 4 Iranian weapons of war ISIS should fear [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Interest [cited 2015 Mar 25]. Available from: https://nationalinterest.org/node/16184. [Link]
27. Pourhossein F, Akhbari M (2019). Geopolitical explanation of religious crises in southwest Asia (Iraq case study 2016-2003). Quarterly of Geography & Regional Planning. 9(37):227-252. [Persian] [Link]
28. Prifti B (2017). US foreign policy in the Middle East: The case for continuity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-45327-9]
29. Qasemi F (2011). Obstacles to the formation of the regional security regime of arms control; A case study of the Middle East. A Quarterly Journal of Foreign Relations. 3(3):11. [Persian] [Link]
30. Rahimi H (2013). Geopolitical theories. Tehran: Entekhab Publications. [Persian] [Link]
31. Rahimi H, Hafeznia MR, Ezzati E, Agnew J (2019). Determining the status of applied recommendations in geopolitical theories of classical period. International Quarterly of Geopolitics. 15(55):1-24. [Persian] [Link]
32. Rotberg RI (2002). The new nature of nation-state failure. The Washington Quarterly. 25(3):85-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1162/01636600260046253]
33. Safavi H, Khaksar AM (2018). Analyzing ISIS's impact on Middle East's political-security equationsations. Geographical Research. 33(1):39-50. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/geores.33.1.39]
34. Salehi SJ, Moradiniaz F (2015). ISIS advent consequences on the Middle East geopolitics. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World. 1(5):103-127. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.20286/priw-050107]
35. Seyyed Nezhad SA, Seraj R (2015). The role of geopolitical factors in the Islamic republic of Iran in providing the Shiites of the world with a political model. Journal of Defense Policy. 23(3):97-130. [Persian] [Link]
36. Smith B, Page R (2015). ISIS and the sectarian conflict in the Middle East. House of Commons Library. Research Paper; No. 15/16. [Link]