1. Arnstein ShR (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association. 35(4):216-224. [ DOI:10.1080/01944366908977225] 2. Akbarian Ronizi SR, Shaykh-Baygloo R (2015). Assessment of environment quality of villages tourism case: Asara county. Rural Research. 6(2):433-457. [Persian] 3. Barati N, Kakavand E (2013). Comparative evaluation of the environmental quality of residential place with an emphasis on citizens image (Case study: Qazvin city). Honar- Ha-Ye-Ziba. 18(3):25-32. [Persian] 4. Barati N, Soleimannejad MA (2011). Perception of stimuli in controlled environment and gender impact on it case study: Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism Students at the International University of Imam Khomaini, Qazvin, Iran. Bagh-e Nazar. 8(17):19-30. [Persian] 5. Barrow CJ (2006). Environmental management for sustainable development. New York: Routledge Publication. [ DOI:10.4324/9780203016671] 6. Brown AL (2003). Increasing the utility of urban environmental quality information. Landscape and Urban Planning. 65(1-2):85-93. [ DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00240-2] 7. Drazkiewicz A, Challies E, Newig J (2015). Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany. Land Use Policy. 46:211-222. [ DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010] 8. Kerselaers E, Rogge E, Vanempten E, Lauwers L, Van G (2013). Changing land use in the countryside: Takeholders perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in Flanders. Land Use Policy. 32:197-206. [ DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.016] 9. Kinsella J, Goetz SJ, Partridge MD, Deller SC, Fleming D (2010). Evaluating RD Policies for social and human capital development. Eurochoices. 9(1):42-47. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00151.x] 10. Latifi A, Sajjadzadeh H (2015). Evaluation of the effect of environmental quality components on behavioral patterns in urban parks, case study: Hamedan People's Park. Urban Studies. 3(11):3-18. [Persian] 11. Litman T (2013). Planning principles and practices. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 12. Marans R (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators 1. Landscape and Urban Planning. 65(1-2):73-83. [ DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00239-6] 13. Mortazavi S (2001). Psychology of the environment and its application. 1st Edition. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [Persian] 14. Motalebi G (2001). Environmental psychology, new knowledge in the service of architecture and urban design. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. 10(0):52-60. [Persian] 15. Moser G (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person-environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 29:351-357. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.002] 16. OECD (2006). The new rural paradigm: Policies and governance. Paris: OECD Publication. [ DOI:10.1787/9789264023918-en] 17. Faircheallaigh C (2010). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 30(1):19-27. [ DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001] 18. Ossoli SH, Fahimi AH, Shahriari H, Jafari SM, Shirazimanesh M (2015). Integrated quality management: Strategic and cultural tools. Tehran: Resa. [Persian] 19. Pakzad J, Saki E (2014). Aesthetic experience of built environment. Honar- Ha-Ye-Ziba. 19(3):5-14. [Persian] 20. Panahi B (2008). Trust and trust in organization. Peyk Noor. 7(4):88-103. [Persian] 21. Pintea MO (2015). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu. 18(1):91-108. 22. Porteous JD (1971). Design with people - the quality of the urban environment, environmental and behavior. Environment and Behavior. 3:155-178. [ DOI:10.1177/001391657100300204] 23. Prager K, Nienaber B, Phillips A, Neumann B (2015). How rural policy should be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management. Rural Studies. 37:120-131. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.12.006] 24. Rafiean M, Taghvaei A, Khademi M, AliPoor R (2013). Comparative Study of quality measurement approaches in designing urban public spaces. Iranian Architecture and Urban Design. 3(4):35-43. [Persian] 25. Rahimi G (2006). Performance evaluation and continuous improvement of organizations. Tadbir Magazine. 173:41-45. [Persian] 26. Ramezani M, Livani M (2014). Identification of native landscape aesthetics patterns in Gilan based on rural landscape analysis (Case study: Post-Chopar village). City Landscape Research. 2:39-52. [Persian] 27. Salvia R, Quaranta G (2017). Place-based rural development and resilience: A lesson from a small community. Sustainability. 9(6):1-15. [ DOI:10.3390/su9060889] 28. Sojjasi Gheidari H, Sadeghloo T, Mahdavi D (2014). Explaining the role of environmental quality rural tourism destinations to strengthen the mentally view of tourists (Case study: Tourist destinations of Rudbar, Ghasran). Spatial Planning. 19(2):61-88. [Persian] 29. Tabibian M, Mansouri Y (2013). Improving environmental quality and living satisfaction in new neighborhoods with prioritizing measures based on residents' opinions (Case study: Kashan). Environmentalology. 39(4):1-16. [Persian] 30. Taghvaei AA, Maroufi S, Pahlavan S (2012). Evaluation of the Impact of Urban Quality on the Social Relations of Citizens; Case Study: Abkouh Town, Mashhad City. Universe. 3(10):42-54. [Persian] 31. United Nations Environment Programme (2009). Geo Cities Manual Guidelines for Integrated Environmental Assessment of Urban Areas. New York: GEO Cities Adaptation for the Arab region. 32. van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman G, Hollander AD (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning. 65(1-2):5-18. [ DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3] 33. Zaynabadi M (2008). Theories and Theories of Social Trust in Society. Research Institute for Strategic Research of the Expediency Council, Department of Social and Cultural Research, Research No. 16; pp. 9-32. [Persian]
|