Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 39, Issue 2 (2024)
GeoRes 2024, 39(2): 233-242 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2024/04/7 | Accepted: 2024/06/26 | Published: 2024/07/21
Received: 2024/04/7 | Accepted: 2024/06/26 | Published: 2024/07/21
How to cite this article
Khalili E, Seyedolhosseini S, Hanaee T, Saeedi Mofard S. Placemaking Based on the Continuity of the Value of Natural Areas. GeoRes 2024; 39 (2) :233-242
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1607-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1607-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract (820 Views)
Aims: The reason for the lack of scientific researches in the field of positioning of natural areas and of course the necessity of combining these two areas to improve the level of positioning of natural areas is the need for a scientific method that can reanalyze and then compare and criticize and then evaluated the best results from the combination of fields in the studies. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the characteristics of the accumulated knowledge in the field of placemaking in terms of form, methodology and content.
Methodology: Meta-analysis method was one of the tools needed to combine the tools needed to inform scientific decisions and policy-making, and on the other hand, it was a research study that systematically combined or integrated single-case results. It was used independently, using statistical methods to calculate a scientific work. The articles reviewed in this research were identified from the scientific database of Semantic Scholar in the period from 2018 to 2022. After reviewing and considering the quality of the output from the content point of view, 31 articles were reviewed and evaluated
Findings: There were more articles in the field of physical and human. The concept of placemaking based on the continuation of the value of natural areas referred to the preservation and sustainable exploitation of natural resources, biodiversity, and balance in ecosystems. Maintaining environmental balance, the economic value of these resources for income generation and employment, the social value of these areas for recreation and rest, and improving the quality of urban life and its environmental value were very valuable for preserving the environment of other creatures and protecting the natural environment.
Conclusion: There was a strong significant relationship between subject classification and theoretical approach. Place-making in nature has also a significant focus on the human-centered field, natural areas, sustainability and social health.
Methodology: Meta-analysis method was one of the tools needed to combine the tools needed to inform scientific decisions and policy-making, and on the other hand, it was a research study that systematically combined or integrated single-case results. It was used independently, using statistical methods to calculate a scientific work. The articles reviewed in this research were identified from the scientific database of Semantic Scholar in the period from 2018 to 2022. After reviewing and considering the quality of the output from the content point of view, 31 articles were reviewed and evaluated
Findings: There were more articles in the field of physical and human. The concept of placemaking based on the continuation of the value of natural areas referred to the preservation and sustainable exploitation of natural resources, biodiversity, and balance in ecosystems. Maintaining environmental balance, the economic value of these resources for income generation and employment, the social value of these areas for recreation and rest, and improving the quality of urban life and its environmental value were very valuable for preserving the environment of other creatures and protecting the natural environment.
Conclusion: There was a strong significant relationship between subject classification and theoretical approach. Place-making in nature has also a significant focus on the human-centered field, natural areas, sustainability and social health.
Keywords:
References
1. Abusaada H, Elshater A (2021). Effect of people on placemaking and affective atmospheres in city streets. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 12(3):3389-3403. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.019]
2. Akbar PNG, Edelenbos J (2021). Positioning place-making as a social process: A systematic literature review. Cogent Social Sciences. 7(1):1905920. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23311886.2021.1905920]
3. Alizadeh B, Hitchmough JD (2020). How will climate change affect future urban naturalistic herbaceous planting? The role of plant origin and fitness. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 54:126786. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126786]
4. Barry J, Agyeman J (2020). On belonging and becoming in the settler-colonial city: Co-produced futurities, placemaking, and urban planning in the United States. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City. 1(1-2):22-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/26884674.2020.1793703]
5. Beattie N (1985). Place and placemaking. Urban Placemaking', Place and Placemaking. 1:93-109. [Link]
6. Boros J, Mahmoud I (2021). Urban design and the role of placemaking in mainstreaming nature-based solutions. Learning from the Biblioteca Degli Alberi case study in Milan. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. 3:635610. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/frsc.2021.635610]
7. Bush J, Hernandez-Santin C, Hes D (2020). Nature in place: Placemaking in the biosphere. In: Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 39-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9624-4_3]
8. Cilliers EJ, Timmermans W, Van den Goorbergh F, Slijkhuis J (2015). Green place-making in practice: From temporary spaces to permanent places. Journal of Urban Design. 20(3):349-366. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031213]
9. Donaldson GH, João EM (2020). Using green infrastructure to add value and assist place-making in public realm developments. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 38(6):464-478. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14615517.2019.1648731]
10. Fajri I, Yusuf R, Azhari B (2020). Innovation model of citizenship education learning in the 21st-century skill-learning environment of students in Aceh. Journal of Critical Reviews. 7(16):2334-2343. [Link]
11. Fernandez de Osso Fuentes M, Keegan BJ, Jones MV, Macintyre T (2022). How can digital placemaking impact health and wellbeing of citizens through green and blue space connections? A systematic literature review protocol. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. [Link]
12. Fernandez de Osso Fuentes M, Keegan BJ, Jones MV, Macintyre T (2023). Digital placemaking, health & wellbeing and nature-based solutions: A systematic review and practice model. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 79:127796. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127796]
13. Fitzpatrick J, Fontana B (2017). Nature-based placemaking: A handbook for utilizing a community's natural outdoor recreational resources to create a total quality experience and support local community and economic development. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Downtown Center. [Link]
14. Garay-Huamán AN, Irazábal-Zurita C (2021). Latinos in Kansas City: The political economy of placemaking. Journal of Planning Literature. 36(2):131-154. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0885412220969910]
15. Greedy RD, Perry EE, Goralnik L, Fitzpatrick J (2022). Nature-based placemaking: A natural asset focused community vibrancy roadmap. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership. 14(1). [Link] [DOI:10.18666/JOREL-2022-V14-I1-11134]
16. Gulsrud NM, Hertzog K, Shears I (2018). Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating "green placemaking" as a nature-based solution. Environmental Research. 161:158-167. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005]
17. Hartanti NB, Martokusumo W, Lubis BU, Poerbo HW (2016). The quest for urban identity: Influence of urban morphological development to the imageability of Bogor city streets. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science. 4(7):49-58. [Link]
18. He S, Hart L, Sayani D, Henderson R (2020). University creative placemaking: Insights from UBC students. UBC Undergraduate Research. [Link]
19. Helmy M (2020). Placemaking in Arab cities. Realities, challenges, and prospects. The Journal of Public Space. 5(1):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.32891/jps.v5i1.1247]
20. Hes D, Hernandez-Santin S, editors (2020). Placemaking fundamentals for the built environment. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9624-4]
21. Hes D, Mateo-Babiano I, Lee G (2020). Fundamentals of placemaking for the built environment: An introduction. In: Placemaking fundamentals for the built environment. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9624-4]
22. Keleg MM, Butina Watson G, Salheen MA (2022). A critical review for Cairo's green open spaces dynamics as a prospect to act as placemaking anchors. Urban Design International. 27(3):232-248. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/s41289-022-00193-x]
23. Lombard M (2014). Constructing ordinary places: Place-making in urban informal settlements in Mexico. Progress in Planning. 94:1-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003]
24. Makhkamov DN (2023). Legal protection of green areas in European countries. International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology. 3(1):17-22. [Link]
25. Mcdonough JT (2013). Place-making: A study of emerging professionals' preferences of place-making attributes [dissertation]. Michigan: Michigan State University. [Link]
26. Mikolajewicz N, Komarova SV (2019). Meta-analytic methodology for basic research: A practical guide. Frontiers in Physiology. 10:00203. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00203]
27. Moradpoor N, Pourahmad A, Hataminejad H, Ziari K (2023). An analysis of resilience in Tehran using a systematic review. Geography and Urban Space Development. 11(1): . [Persian] [Link]
28. Moreira, S. [2021]. What is placemaking. O que é placemaking. 27:12-15. [Link]
29. Najafi P, Mohammadi M, Le Blanc PM, Van Wesemael P (2022). Insights into placemaking, senior people, and digital technology: A systematic quantitative review. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17549175.2022.2076721]
30. Öncel H, Levend S (2023). The effects of urban growth on natural areas: The 3 metropolitan areas in Türkiye. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 195:816. [Link] [DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2393249/v1]
31. Pigott TD, Polanin JR (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research. 90(1):24-46. [Link] [DOI:10.3102/0034654319877153]
32. Ramadhani I, Tahir A, Annisa S (2021). Placemaking and refugees: A literature review. Resilience Development Initiative. [Link]
33. Ramli NA, Ujang N (2020). An overview of creative placemaking as an enabler for a sustainable urban regeneration. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal. 5(13):345-352. [Link] [DOI:10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2056]
34. Ran J, MacGillivray BH, Gong Y, Hales TC (2020). The application of frameworks for measuring social vulnerability and resilience to geophysical hazards within developing countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Science of the Total Environment. 711:134486. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134486]
35. Sadeghi AR, Shahvaran F, Gholami AR, Feyzabi T (2022). Toward behavior-based placemaking: The evolution of place concept in urban design knowledge. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management. 7(3):357-372. [Link]
36. Sen A, Nagendra H (2019). The role of environmental placemaking in shaping contemporary environmentalism and understanding land change. Journal of Land Use Science. 14(4-6):410-424. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1747423X.2020.1720841]
37. Sen A, Nagendra H (2020). Local community engagement, environmental placemaking and stewardship by migrants: A case study of lake conservation in Bengaluru, India. Landscape and Urban Planning. 204:103933. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103933]
38. Serin B (2018). Cross disciplinary review of placemaking literature: A literature mapping. Working Paper. Glasgow: UK Collaborative Centre for Housing Evidence. [Link]
39. Shaheen N, Shaheen A, Ramadan A, Hefnawy MT, Ramadan A, Ibrahim IA, et al (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 8:1268045. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/frma.2023.1268045]
40. Silberberg S (2013). Pretext securitization of Boston's public realm after 9/11: Motives, actors, and a role for planners. Policing Cities:246-271. [Link]
41. Sisto R, García López J, Lumbreras Martín J, Mataix Aldeanueva C, Ramos Ferreiro L (2021). City assessment tool to measure the impact of public policies on smart and sustainable cities. The case study of the municipality of Alcobendas (Spain) compared with similar European cities. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. 3:81-101. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3_6]
42. Son IS, Krolikowski C, Rentschler R, Huang SS (2022). Utilizing events for placemaking of precincts and main streets: Current state and critical success factors. Event Management. 26(2):223-235. [Link] [DOI:10.3727/152599521X16106577965044]
43. Strydom W, Puren K, Drewes E (2018). Exploring theoretical trends in placemaking: Towards new perspectives in spatial planning. Journal of Place Management and Development. 11(2):165-180. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JPMD-11-2017-0113]
44. Toolis EE (2021). Restoring the balance between people, places, and profits: A psychosocial analysis of uneven community development and the case for placemaking processes. Sustainability. 13(13):7256. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su13137256]
45. Verdiguel NR (2021). The role of placemaking in universities and their surrounding communities: A literature review. Honors Undergraduate Theses. 1015. [Link]
46. Wardhani WC, Hartanti NB, Utomo H (2023). Creative placemaking elements in public space design to strengthen the character of cultural arts centers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti. 8(1):85-98. [Indonesian] [Link]
47. Wyckoff MA (2014). Definition of placemaking: Four different types. Planning & Zoning News. 32(3):Unknown pages. [Link]
48. Zorbaugh H (2005). The natural areas of the city. The urban sociology reader. 1:82-88. [Link]