Persian
Volume 39, Issue 1 (2024)                   GeoRes 2024, 39(1): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML Full-Text (HTML)


History

How to cite this article
Doosthoseini M, Bigdeli Rad V, Moinifar M. Assessment of the Social Participation Indicators in the Establishment of Urban Creative Districts within District Eleven in Tehran. GeoRes 2024; 39 (1) :1-10
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1504-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Nokhbegan Boulevard, Qazvin, Iran. Postal Code: 3471993116 (vahid.bigdeli@qiau.ac.ir)
Abstract   (1346 Views)

Aims: Nowadays, cities engage in a competition to showcase their innovative approaches within financial frameworks. The objective of this research endeavor was to employ the technique of structural equation modeling to validate a conceptual framework pertaining to social participation in the establishment of creative districts within urban settings.
Methodology: The methodology employed for this study involved conducting applied research within District 11 of the Tehran Municipality during the year 2023. The selection of the statistical population was based on the most recent population and housing census, resulting in a total of 308,176 individuals. By utilizing the Cochran formula, a sample size of 383.6 individuals was determined. After eliminating incomplete questionnaires, a total of 374 questionnaires from native residents of District 11 in Tehran were analyzed. Each neighborhood within District 11 made a contribution of 22 questionnaires. Spatial cluster sampling was implemented as the selected method of sampling. The collected data were subsequently subjected to structural equation modeling in order to ascertain the underlying causal relationships between the variables.
Findings: The results indicated a significant positive impact of involvement on social participation, as demonstrated by a path coefficient of 0.701. Moreover, several factors including the sustainability, depth, rate, and diversity of participation also displayed favorable and substantial effects on social participation, with corresponding path coefficients of 0.682, 0.226, 0.882, and 0.429. The increased level of social participation within the urban creative district played a pivotal role in promoting innovation, citizen engagement, quality of life, and the human capital of its residents.
Conclusion: In relation to the variables pertaining to social participation, it was observed that the variables associated with participation's influence exerted a more substantial impact, while the aspect of participation sustainability displayed a relatively weaker effect on social participation within the context of urban creative districts. Moreover, sub-indicators such as the failure to identify and attract talented individuals, the lack of cooperation and participation from diverse segments of society, contribute to the untapped potential and impede the growth of the urban creative district.
 

Keywords:

References
1. Awaliyah DN (2021). Books and discussion hybrid space for creative city. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 738:012050. [Link] [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012050]
2. Chang JY (2018). State participation and artistic autonomy in creative city making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 51(1):226-243. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0308518X18786724]
3. Davari A, Rezazadeh A (2014). Structural equation modeling with PLS. Tehran: Academic Center for Education Culture and Research. [Persian] [Link]
4. Dehi Aroogh M, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F (2020). Social participation of older adults: A concept analysis. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery. 8(1):55-72. [Link]
5. Foadiyan M, Karkehabadi Z, Kamyabi S (2021). Analysis of the position of creative city indicators in the direction of branding to achieve sustainable urban development (case study: Damghan city). Journal of the Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas. 2(1):127-142. [Persian] [Link]
6. Fotuhi Mehrabani B, Kalantari M, Rajaei SA (2017). Creative city and presenting Iranian creative city index. Geography. 14(51):101-118. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ghorbaniantabrizi M, Pourmohammadi M, Hosseinzadeh Delir K (2023). Explaining the patterns of the formation of a creative city with an emphasis on the role of public spaces. Journal of Geography and Planning. 27(84):111-120. [Persian] [Link]
8. Habibi A, kolahi B (2022). Structural equation modeling and factor analysis. 2nd edition. Tehran: Academic Center for Education Culture and Research. [Persian] [Link]
9. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice. 19(2):139-152. [Link] [DOI:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202]
10. Hashidate H, Shimada H, Fujisawa Y, Yatsunami M (2021). An overview of social participation in older adults: Concepts and assessments. Physical Therapy Research. 24(2):85-97. [Link] [DOI:10.1298/ptr.R0013]
11. Hospers GJ, van Dalm R (2005). How to create a creative city? The viewpoints of Richard Florida and Jane Jacobs. Foresight. 7(4):8-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/14636680510611796]
12. Hosseini A, Abbasnejad Jelogir M, Akhavan Anvari A, Sajjadi SA (2021). Analysis of pedestrian in the central district of cities: The study of the Saf (Sepahsalar) pedestrian and Si-Tir Street in Tehran. Geographical Urban Planning Research. 9(2):335-359. [Persian] [Link]
13. Jones CA, Jhangri GS, Yamamoto SS, Hogan DB, Hanson H, Levasseur M, et al (2023). Social participation of older people in urban and rural areas: Canadian longitudinal study on aging. BMC Geriatrics. 23:439. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04127-2]
14. Kalantari M, Rajaei SA, Fotouhi Mehrabani B (2017). Analysis of Iran metropolises in terms of possessing indices of creative city. Geographical Urban Planning Research. 4(4):587-612. [Persian] [Link]
15. Koster M, Nakken H, Pijl SJ, van Houten EJ, Spelberg HCL (2008). Assessing social participation of pupils with special needs in inclusive education: The construction of a teacher questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation. 14(5):395-409. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13803610802337657]
16. Levasseur M, Lussier-Therrien M, Biron ML, Raymond É, Castonguay J, Naud D, et al (2022). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: Update and co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition. Age and Ageing. 51(2): afab215. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ageing/afab215]
17. Maleki S, Bigdeli Rad V (2017). Social sustainability measures for rural areas in Iran. Space Ontology International Journal. 6(1):79-84. [Persian] [Link]
18. Meshkini A, Alipour S, Hajizadeh M (2020). Explaining the levels of urban creativity in the metropolitan cities (case study: Karaj metropolis). Human Geography Research. 52(2):385-400. [Persian] [Link]
19. Moayedfar S, Babaei Nodooshan MR, Zarei Mahmudabadi M (2021). Providing an interpretive structural model of the indicators of the reliability of the creative city (case study: District 3 of Yazd City). 12(46):94-110. [Persian] [Link]
20. Mohsenin S, Esfidani M (2014). Structural equations based on partial least squares approach using smart pls software: Educational and practical. Tehran: Mehraban Publishing Institute. [Persian] [Link]
21. Nan R, Ouyang F (2020). Influence of social networks on citizens' willingness to participate in social governance: Evidence from China. Journal Complexity. 2020:3819514. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2020/3819514]
22. Nematollahi SD (2021). The relationship between citizenship ethics, social participation and trust among the citizens of Tabriz. Sociological Studies. 14(53):7-23. [Persian] [Link]
23. Part Consulting Engineers (2012). Tehran District 11 Development Plan. Tehran: Tehran Urban Planning and Research Center. [Link]
24. Rad VB, Najafpour H, Ngah I, Shieh E, Rashvand P, Rad HB (2015). What are the safety factors associating with physical activity in urban neighborhoods? A systematic review. Environmental Science, Sociology. 5(3):259-266. [Link]
25. Rostami M, Rezaie Eshaghvandi S (2021). Analyzing the creative city indices using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) (case study: Kermanshah city). Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies. 2(2):82-104. [Persian] [Link]
26. Sarvar R, Akbari M, Amani M, Taleshi Anboohi M (2015). Analysis of urban neighborhoods' efficiency in terms of creative city indicators (case study: Bonab city). Geography Journal. 14(New Series,48):322-351. [Persian] [Link]
27. Savini F, Dembski S (2016). Manufacturing the creative city: Symbols and politics of Amsterdam North. Cities. 55:139-147. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.013]
28. Segovia C, Hervé J (2022). The creative city approach: Origins, construction and prospects in a scenario of transition. City, Territory and Architecture. 9:29. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s40410-022-00178-x]
29. Smołka-Franke B (2021). The creative city concept and city development. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series. p. 633-641. [Link] [DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2021.151.43]
30. Tomić V, Djukić A (2018). Creative city: Challenging concept. Facta Universitatis-Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering. 16(2):263-277. [Link] [DOI:10.2298/FUACE180108007T]
31. United Nations (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York: United Nations. [Link]
32. Vinzi VE, Trinchera L, Amato S (2010). PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In: Handbook of partial least squares. Heidelberg: Springer. p. 47-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3]
33. Wilson K, Hannington S, Stephen M (2015). The role of community participation in planning processes of emerging urban centres: A study of Paidha town in Northern Uganda. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES). 4(6):61-73. [Link]
34. Xiao S, Lin H, Zhao C, Zheng X, Shi L, Zhang J, et al (2021). Impact of different type and frequency of social participation on depressive symptoms among older Chinese adults: Is there a gender difference? Frontiers in Psychiatry. 12:758105. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.758105]
35. Yarahamdi N, Rezaei MR, Khaliji MA (2021). Factors and components of effective environmental design in creating creative urban spaces (case study: Ahvaz). Regional Planning Quarterly. 11(43):96-108. [Persian] [Link]
36. Yencken D (2013). Creative cities. Space Place and Culture. London: Future Leaders. [Link]
37. Ziari K, & Ghasemi Ghasemvand E (2016). Assessment of qualitative and quantitative indices of housing by sustainable development approach (Case study: Saman City). Geographical Urban Planning Research. 4(2):197-221. [Persian] [Link]