Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 4 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(4): 449-456 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2022/08/24 | Accepted: 2022/11/11 | Published: 2022/11/1
Received: 2022/08/24 | Accepted: 2022/11/11 | Published: 2022/11/1
How to cite this article
Safaeipour Z, Sarvar R, Ghorbanenejhad R. Analysis of Organizational Structures in Tehran Metropolitan Privacy Construction Processes based on Game Theory Approach. GeoRes 2022; 37 (4) :449-456
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1399-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1399-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Geography, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (744 Views)
Aims: Effective organizations in the construction processes in the city limits need to use new and efficient models to solve discrete management problems. Using common modeling tools in cities and big cities, in addition to accurately determining the problem also identifies effective solutions. If these tools are used well then the understanding of real world problems will be facilitated. One of these tools is "game theory". This research tries to analyze the organizational structures in the construction processes in Tehran with the help of game theory.
Methodology: This descriptive-analytical research was conducted in 1401. The data required for this research were collected by the "documentary-survey" method (interview and observation). The statistical population of this research includes managers and experts who were selected based on purposeful and theoretical sampling and their number is 20 people. Also using the content analysis method, the data of this research was analyzed. The graph model was also used as a suitable tool for modeling, analyzing complex issues and analyzing the state of the game among different stakeholders of organizations related to construction in the city. GMCR+ software was used for this modeling.
Findings: The results of this modeling show that among the 42 situations, there are 6 stable and 6 semi-stable situations.
Conclusion: Aggregate analyzes of organizations show that the desirability of organizational structures in the city of Tehran which has the potential to maximize the interests of actors, requires structural reforms and these reforms should focus on environmental protection and coordination power and be consistent with upstream documents and provide capacity building and active presence of actors.
Methodology: This descriptive-analytical research was conducted in 1401. The data required for this research were collected by the "documentary-survey" method (interview and observation). The statistical population of this research includes managers and experts who were selected based on purposeful and theoretical sampling and their number is 20 people. Also using the content analysis method, the data of this research was analyzed. The graph model was also used as a suitable tool for modeling, analyzing complex issues and analyzing the state of the game among different stakeholders of organizations related to construction in the city. GMCR+ software was used for this modeling.
Findings: The results of this modeling show that among the 42 situations, there are 6 stable and 6 semi-stable situations.
Conclusion: Aggregate analyzes of organizations show that the desirability of organizational structures in the city of Tehran which has the potential to maximize the interests of actors, requires structural reforms and these reforms should focus on environmental protection and coordination power and be consistent with upstream documents and provide capacity building and active presence of actors.
Keywords:
References
1. Alian M, Razavian MT, Esmaeilzadeh H, Fanni Z , Farajirad K (2018). The Application of Game Theory to the Analysis of Actors in Urban Management. Quarterly Journal of Spatial Planning and Planning. 22(4):53-85. [Persian] [Link]
2. Alian M, Mohammadpour S, Razavian MT (2019). Strategic modeling and analysis of the relationship between regional activists Tehran metropolitan area with game theory approach. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy. 9(31):131-152. [Persian] [Link]
3. Akbari M, Sobhani N, Mousavi Noor SA (2017). Application of model Meta-SWOT in planning and management of protection and sustainable development of metropolitan privacy (Case study: Privacy in the Southern zone of Tehran metropolis). Quarterly Journal of Parliament and Strategy. 24(91):66-100. [Persian] [Link]
4. Afsharnia A, Mirzadeh SH (2016). Strategies for determining the optimal size and level of urban privacy in the comprehensive cities of less than 50,000 people. Journal of Urban Studies. (20):65-78. [Persian] [Link]
5. Brohi N, Sarfraz M, Bamiah M, Brohi M (2018). Big data in smart cities: A systematic mapping review. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 13(7):2246-2270. [Link]
6. Berakpour N, Asadi I, Basirat M (2012). Typology of Privacy and Global Experiences of Planning and Its Management. Journal of Research and Education in Shahrnegar.12:56-57. [Link]
7. Falahati A, Delangizan S, Ansari MA (2017). Strategic modeling and analysis of retirement crisis in Iran with Game Theory Approach. Journal of Management Improvement.13(1):61-92. [Persian] [Link]
8. Issazadeh S, Ahmadzadeh A (2009). The effect of institutional factors on economic growth with emphasis on sovereign institutions case study inter-country. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research in Iran. 13(40):1-28. [Persian] [Link]
9. Kilgour DM, Hipel KW, Fang L, Peng X (2001). Coalition analysis in group decision support. Group Decision and Negotiation.10(2): 159-175. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1008713120075]
10. Kilgour DM, Hipel KW (2005). The graph model for conflict resolution: past present and future. Group Decision Negotiation. 14(6):441-460. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10726-005-9002-x]
11. Lee CS (2012). Multi-objective game theory models for conflict analysis in reservoir watershed management. Chemosphere. 87(6):608-613. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.014]
12. Moshiri S (2011). Control and guidance of urban construction; Efficient System Design. Quarterly. Hoviatshahr. 4(7):23-30. [Persian] [Link]
13. Menard C, Shirly M (2014). The future of new institutional economics: from early intuitions to a new paradigm. Journal of Institutional Economics. 10(14):541-565. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S174413741400006X]
14. Nasirian N, Basirat M (2022). Analysis of beneficiaries of capital's privacy (Tehran metropolis) Based on power/benefit matrix. Geography and Urban Space Development Magazine. 9(2):77-95. [Persian] [Link]
15. Sarvar R, Bafrani J (2019). Strategic analysis of the status of political management system of the limit of urban area of Tehran. Political Spatial Planning. 1(3):129-138. [Persian] [Link]
16. Sobhani N, Ziviar P, Sarvar R (2019). Investigation and analysis of causal and disability relationships of indicators affecting integrated management of capital privacy. Quarterly Journal of Human Geography Research.51(2):429-451. [Persian] [Link]
17. Sorace C, Hurst W (2015). China's phantom urbanisation and the pathology of ghost cities. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 46(2):304-322. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00472336.2015.1115532]
18. Safaei A, Malekmami B (2014). Game theory guidelines for sustainable governance of common water resources (Case study: Urmia lake water dispute). Journal of Environmental Studies. 40(1):121-138. [Persian] [Link]
19. Shakiba H, Delangizan S, Mohamadifar Y (2020). Modeling and strategic analysis of inclusive urban entrepreneurial ecosystem using game theory approach city (Case of study: Kermanshah). Journal of Improvement Management. 14(3):122-137. [Persian] [Link]
20. Shakiba Barougha A, Valinejad ShoubiaM, Emami Skardi MJ (2012). Application of game theory approach solving the construction project conflicts. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 58:1586-1593. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1145]
21. Samsura D, Krabben E, Deemen AM (2010). A game theory approach to the analysis of land and property development processes. Land Use Policy. 27(2):564-578. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.012]
22. Tan R, Liu Y, Zhou K, Jiao L, Tang W (2015). A game theory based agent-cellular Model for use in urban growth simulation: A case study of the rapidly urbanizing Wuhan area of central China. Computers Environment and Urban Systems. 49:15-29. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.09.001]
23. Taherkhani A (2018). Technology-based approaches in the monitoring process of urban construction system. 13 September 2018. Second National Congress on Infrastructure Development of Road and Urban Technology of Iran With a focus on resilience and crisis management: Tehran. [Persian] [Link]
24. Zoghi M, Safaei A, Malek Mohammadi B (2014). Guidelines of game theory in the analysis of land use change conflict (Case study: Lands in Darabad neighborhood of Tehran). Geographical Urban Research Planning. 4(3):391-407. [Persian] [Link]
25. Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L (2011). An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat International. 35(1):141-149. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.006]