[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
:: Volume 35, Issue 2 (2020) ::
GeoRes 2020, 35(2): 105-115 Back to browse issues page
Comparative Study of Sustainable Development of Nomadic Areas from Legal Rules and Development Programs Perspective before and after the Islamic Revolution in Iran
Mohammad Pakrah1, Seyed Abbas Poorhashemi *2, Mohammad Reza Parvin3
1- Department of Environmental Law, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Environmental Law, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran , pourhashemi@gmail.com
3- Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Abstract:   (2266 Views)
Aims & Backgrounds: The aim of this study was to compare the sustainable development of nomadic areas of the country from the perspective of legal rules in the period before and after the Islamic Revolution of Iran.
Methodology: This research is descriptive and analytical in the form of an in-depth study. In the first part, basic information about nomadic status (population, distribution and percentage) was collected before and after the revolution. Then; relevant rules and regulations that were enacted in each period were extracted and compared. Also; a comparative comparison was made between the indicators of sustainable nomadic development in the two studied periods. Therefore, the World Bank's approach and guidelines were used to measure sustainable development indicators.
Findings: Sustainable development of nomadic areas during the pre-revolutionary period has varied. While in the post-revolutionary period, there is less turmoil in planning and formulating laws. On the other hand, some indicators of sustainable development have been more favorable. For example: ‌ Capital financing by the local community, income level, natural ecosystem health and natural resource utilization. While in the post-revolutionary period, indicators such as the existence of legal rules, participation in the implementation of development programs, the presentation of plans and programs to the government, the level of health, literacy and effective role in the national economy are better.
Conclusion: The results show that despite progressive laws such as Article 50 of the Constitution, the current legal rules are incapable of balancing the indicators of human, environmental and economic development in nomadic areas.
Keywords: Sustainable Development, Nomadic Areas, Development Programs, Legal Rules
Full-Text [PDF 717 kb]   (437 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/04/27 | Accepted: 2020/05/23 | Published: 2020/05/23
English Expanded Abstract [HTML 14 KB]  (11 Download)
References
1. Bakhshandeh Nosrat A, Miraj F (2011). Society and zoning of the nomadic population of Iran. Tehran: Nosrat. [Persian]
2. Borriello F (2013). The sustainability of mediterranean port areas: Environmental management for local regeneration in Valencia. Journal Sustainability. 5(10):4288-4311. [DOI:10.3390/su5104288]
3. Cochran JC, Lynch MJ, Toman EL, Shields (2016). Court sentencing patterns for environmental crimes: Is there a "Green" gap in punishment?. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 1-30. [DOI:10.1007/s10940-016-9322-9]
4. Education for a Sustainable Future [Internet]. UNESCO: Sustainable development begins with education [Cited 2017, 5 August; Published 2008]. Paris: UNESCO Publications.
5. Hajivand A, Mirkamali A, Safari F, Sarvai Sarmidani O (2018). Government criminal responsibility for environmental crimes in Iran: Necessities and challenges. Environmental Sciences. 16(2):65-82. [Persian]
6. Hosseini S, Daneshfard K, Memarzadeh Tehran GR, Bahmanpour H (2019). Validation of networking approach in environmental policy in IRAN to decrease environmental pollution by factor analysis method. Anthropogenic Pollution Journal. 3(2):1-9. [Persian]
7. Noroozi A, Mahmoodian F (2015). Comparative study of economic and social indicators of settled and uninhabited nomads case study: Koohrang city. Journal of Spatial Planning (Geography). 5(4):17-38. [Persian]
8. PBO (2019). Plan and budget organization, the evolution of development approaches from an international perspective with an emphasis on sustainable development, 89 p.
9. Piri F, Aftab A, Majnooni A (2018). Investigating the role of nomadic community in establishing lasting security in Iran's border areas. Journal of Border Sciences and Technology. 7(4):121-146. [Persian]
10. Safinejad J (2004). The social structure of Iranian nomads. Journal of National Studies. 5(1):43- 84. [Persian]
11. Sidayi E, Dehghani A (2011). Programming of nomadic ecosystems. Tehran: Isfahan University Jihad Publications. [Persian]
12. Statistical Center of Iran [Internet]. Statistical center of Iran, Iranian population and housing Census; Nomadic Areas. periodic report. [Published 2019, 15 May; Cited 2018, 23 July]. Tehran: Iranian Statistical Center Publications.
13. Tavakoli J, Ziatavana MH (2009). The spatial consequences of nomadic settlement in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Rural and Development Quarterly.12(1):53-86. [Persian]
14. The Science and Environmental Health Network [Internet]. The International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School, Modeles for Protecting the Environment for future Generations. [Published 2008, 7 May
15. Cited 2012, 23 June]. United States: SEHN Publications WB. (2017) Guidance note on tools for pollution management, World Bank. 221 p.
16. Yousefi J, Ozkia M, Kaldi A (2017). Development of a conceptual model resulting from the combination of indigenous and modern knowledge using the basic theory in the restoration, preservation, maintenance and exploitation of natural resources with the post-development approach of Mamasani tribe of Fars province. Sociological studies. 10(34):7-31. [Persian]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

pakrah M, Poorhashemi S A, Parvin M R. Comparative Study of Sustainable Development of Nomadic Areas from Legal Rules and Development Programs Perspective before and after the Islamic Revolution in Iran. GeoRes. 2020; 35 (2) :105-115
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-878-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 35, Issue 2 (2020) Back to browse issues page
تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4414