Afarand Journals

Geographical Research

eISSN : 2538-4384
pISSN : 1019-7052
Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 34, Issue 4 (2019)                   GeoRes 2019, 34(4): 595-605 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML

‎ 10.29252/geores.34.4.595

History

Received: 2019/09/29 | Accepted: 2019/12/21 | Published: 2020/02/25
How to cite this article
askarizadeh S, zarabi A, Taghvaei M. The Status of Indicators of Good Urban Governance in Arak City, Iran, in the Viewpoints of Urban Managers and Citizens. GeoRes 2019; 34 (4) :595-605
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-794-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
The Status of Indicators of Good Urban Governance in Arak City, Iran, in the Viewpoints of Urban Managers and Citizens
Authors Sohila Askarizadeh1, Asghar Zarabi *1, Mashood Taghvaei1
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Geographic Sciences Faculty, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract   (2569 Views)

Aims & Backgrounds: Today, the good urban governance approach has been introduced as the most effective and sustainable method of management practice. Arak, as one of the most important industrial cities in the country, has many problems which need to pay attention to management patterns that can be considered as one of the appropriate solutions to overcome these problems. The purpose of this study is to investigate good urban governance as a case study in Arak city from the perspective of urban managers and citizens.
Methodology: This descriptive-analytical study was carried out using a survey method (questionnaire) in the form of urban good governance indices. Population of study include managers and citizens of arak and study sample was 100 for managers and 384 for citizens.
Findings: Findings showed that most of Arak city governance indicators were not suitable from the viewpoint of urban managers and citizens, but social justice and law indicators with a coefficient of 2.44 and 1.90 respectively from urban managers and citizens’ perspectivewere in the worst situation. Six governance indicators have the ability to explain less than 50% of the satisfaction index. In terms of spatial distribution of good governance, the differences between regions in the two indicators of participation and access to information were significant. Structural equation modeling also showed that good governance indices in Arak are in poor condition, which confirms the developed model.
Conclusion: Arak is in an unsuitable position in terms of indicators of good urban governance. 

Keywords:
Good Urban Governance, Urban Managers, Arak City, Spatial- Locational Distribution
References
1. Alavi Zadeh SMA (2007). Socio-economic development patterns with an emphasis on rural development in Iran. Journal of Political and Economic Information. 22(5):190-201. [Persian]
2. Amini M, Saremi H R, Ghalibaf M B (2019). The role of urban governance in the urban worn texture regeneration process case study: District 12 of Tehran. Geographical Researches. 34(1):11-19.
3. Askarizadeh S, Zarabi A, Taghvaei M (2019). Investigating the status of good urban governance indicators in Arak. Journal of Geography and Regional Development. 30(1):309-335. [Persian]
4. Cave RW, editor (2005). Encyclopedia of the city. London & New York: Routledge.
5. Gani A , Duncan R (2007). Measuring good governance using time series data: Fiji Islands. Journal of Asia Pacific Economy.12(3):367-385. [DOI:10.1080/13547860701405979]
6. Gholipour R (2008). Good governance and appropriate government model, research deputy of Islamic Azad University Tehran. Center for Strategic Research. Vice chancellor for research, Islamic Azad University. Office of Science Production Development. [Persian]
7. Hosseini H (2015). Analysis of good governance indicators with emphasis on citizens and managers' views. Journal of Urban Studies. 20(5):43-52. [Persian]
8. Imani Jahjormi H (2003). Urban Governance and Harry's Research. Journal of Urban Management. 15(3):59-52. [Persian]
9. Jafari N, Barghi H, Ghanbari Y (2019). Performance of Dehyari in the framework of good rural governance; case study of Zanjan villages, Iran. Geographical Researches. 34(1):11-19. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/geores.34.1.11]
10. Jones B, Bull A (2006). Governance and social capital in urban regeneration: A comparison¬ between¬ Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies. 43(4):63-76. [DOI:10.1080/00420980600597558]
11. Mohammadi J, Kamali Baghrahi I (2016). Analysis the good urban governance indicators for urban development strategy case study: The old texture areas of Kerman city. Journal of Geography and Urban and Regional Planning. 21(4):153-170. [Persian]
12. Rahnamaei M T, Keshavarz M (2011). A study of the good governing pattern and the role of government in managing and managing the Affairs of cities in Iran. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. 1(1):23-55. [Persian]
13. Roberts SM, Wright S, ONeillc P (2007). Good governance in the pacific? Ambivalence and possibility. Geoforum. 38(5):967-984. [DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.04.003]
14. Sadashiva M (2008). Effects of civil society on urban planning and governance in Meysore, India. [dissertation]. Germany: Technical University of Dortmund.
15. Sheng YK (2010). Good urban governance in southeast Asia. Journal of Environment and Urbanization ASIA. 1(2):131-147. [DOI:10.1177/097542531000100203]
16. Stewart K (2006). Designing good urban governance indicators: The importance of citizen participation and its evaluation in Greater Vancouver.Cities. 23(3):196-204 [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2006.03.003]
17. Tavakoli H, Momeni M (2016). Investigating the achievement of good governance indicators with an emphasis on urban quality of life case study of districts 1, 7 and 22 in Tehran. Journal of Urban Management Studies. 8(26):1-18. [Persian]
18. The Center of Iran Statistic (2016). Population and housing census 2016. Tehran. [Persian]
19. Torabi A (2005). Sustainable urban management under good governance. Journal of Municipalities. 69(6):45-36. [Persian]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author