زمان پاسخگویی تنها روزهای زوج ساعت 10 الی 12  

   [Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Volume 34, Issue 2 (2019) ::
geores 2019, 34(2): 193-201 Back to browse issues page
Determining the Place Dignity Model and Studying Its Various Dimensions
Mahla Mohamadnia *1, Seyed Abdolhadi Daneshpour2, Seyed Moslem Seyedalhosseini3
1- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran , deurb.pln@gmail.com
2- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (573 Views)
Aims & Backgrounds: People interact with different places of a city as an environment that responds to their needs and activities, and at a higher level, people define a part of their dignity in relation to these places and place attachment occurs. The phrase "place dignity" is considered as one of the dimensions of people and place relationship which is less considered by architects, designers and planners. In this regard, explaining the concept of place dignity and the process of forming the people-place interaction and the effective factors for creating, strengthening and valuing these links, is a basic step in achieving the main objective of explaining the place dignity criteria. The aim of the research was to explain the place dignity model and studying its various dimensions.
Methodology: In this qualitative study the related Persian and English articles were investigated using fundamental conceptualization theory through inductive method and the concepts were determined using three types of open, axial, and selective coding.
Findings: 428 codes were identified as the indicators of dignity creating which include of 150 concepts and 14 category (comfort/well-being and security/ relaxation; favorable landscape; social interactions; regularity; vitality; identity and originality; readability; memorability; sense of belonging; access; meaning and content; citizen activity and management; diversity; place dignity and personality).
Conclusion: The strategies for promoting the place dignity are the factors of strengthening the institutional form of place, development of  the explained perspectives for the future of the place, commitment to preserving the values of the environment and artificial elements, establishing the spatial position of the place in the system of meta place, comprehensive readiness, values and characteristics of the demands of residents and people outside the place, preserving the valuable elements, upgrading place role in meta place area, deploying infrastructure in place, historical evolution, growth and future of the place, recognition of elements of the place perceptual index, correction of behavioral platform, preparing the backgrounds for establishment of social behavior and communication between individuals, strengthening the spatial-physical structure of the place.
Keywords: |Place Dignity|Place|People-Place Interaction|Foundation Data Theory. ,
Full-Text [PDF 751 kb]   (75 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Urban Planning
Received: 2019/01/23 | Accepted: 2019/02/24 | Published: 2019/06/3
References
1. American Heritage (1975). The American Heritage dictionary of the English language. Rockville: American Heritage Publication. [Article]
2. Anderberg P, Lepp M, Berglund AL, Segesten K (2017). Preserving dignity in caring for older adults: A concept analysis. Advance Nursing. 59(6):635-43. [Article] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04375.x] [PMID]
3. Andorno R (2013). The dual role of human dignity in bioethics. Medicine, health care and philosophy. 16(4):967-973. [Article] [DOI:10.1007/s11019-011-9373-5] [PMID]
4. Batra N (2013). Dignity by Design: Tool of social urbanism [Internet]. Engaged Citizens Responsive City [Cited 2018, 25 December]. Available from: https://www.pria.org/engaged-citizens-responsive-city/?p=1176 [Article]
5. Danayifard H (2006). Theorizing using a deductive approach: The conceptualization strategy of fundamental theory. Daneshvar Behavioral Journal. 15(29):102-121. [Persian]
6. Davy B, Pellissery S, Jacobs HM (2017). Land policies in India promises, practices and challenges. In: Davy B, editor. Human dignity and property in land - A human rights approach. New York: Springer. [Article] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-4208-9_1]
7. Dehkhoda A (1956). Dehkhoda dictionary [Internet]. Tehran: Dehkhoda Institute [Cited 2018, 13 August]. Available from: https://www.revolvy.com [Article]
8. Gallagher A, Li S, Wainwright P, Jones IR, Lee D (2008). Dignity in the care of older people - a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BioMedical Center Nursing. 7:11. [Article] [DOI:10.1186/1472-6955-7-11] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Hicks D (2013). Dignity: The essential role it plays in resolving. New Haven, CT: Yale University. [Article]
10. Jacobson N (2007). Dignity and health: A review. Social Science & Medicine. 64(2):292-302. [Article] [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.039] [PMID]
11. McCrudden Ch (2013). Understanding human dignity. 1st Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Article] [DOI:10.5871/bacad/9780197265642.001.0001]
12. Nordenfelt L (2009). Dignity in care for older people. New York: Blackwell Publication. [Article] [DOI:10.1002/9781444316414]
13. Hornby AS, Mclntosh C, Wehmeier S (2005). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. 7th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. [Article]
14. Schroedr D (2012). Human rights and human dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 15(3):323-335. [Article] [DOI:10.1007/s10677-011-9326-3]
15. Strauss A, Corbin J (2011). Principles of qualitative research methodology: Basic Theory, procedures and practices. Mohammadi B, Translator. 3rd Edition. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies Publication. [Persian] [Article]
16. Tadd W, Cesagen R, Hillman A, Sian C, Calnan M, Bayer T, et al (2011). Right place - wrong person: Dignity in the acute care of older people. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 12(1):33-43. [Article] [DOI:10.5042/qiaoa.2011.0143]
17. Uei S, Lin W, Shu C (2010). Promoting dignity in long term care. Maca Journal of Nursing. 9(2):20-4. [Article]
18. Yvonne M, Diana N (2016). Designing with dignity: Health and design research for underserved communities. The Plan Journal. 1(2):303-317. [Article] [DOI:10.15274/tpj.2016.01.02.06]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohamadnia M, Daneshpour S A, Seyedalhosseini S M. Determining the Place Dignity Model and Studying Its Various Dimensions. geores. 2019; 34 (2) :193-201
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-687-en.html


Volume 34, Issue 2 (2019) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 3977