Volume 34, Issue 1 (2019)
GeoRes 2019, 34(1): 63-72 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2018/11/3 | Accepted: 2018/12/9 | Published: 2019/03/17
Received: 2018/11/3 | Accepted: 2018/12/9 | Published: 2019/03/17
Rights and permissions
1- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran, baastanimojdeh72@gmail.com
2- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran, sanaz.saeedi@hotmail.com
2- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Urbanism, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran, sanaz.saeedi@hotmail.com
Abstract (4189 Views)
Background and Aims: Urban texture assessment with passive defense approach is one of the most important issues in the field of urban planning. In this research, we try to evaluate the vulnerability of urban tissue to the enemy's threats, because inactive defense by using unarmed measures reduces Vulnerability and increased deterrence at the time of the threat. Noghan Neighborhood located in the area of 2 tissues around the shrine due to being located in the central area of the city and adjacent to the tissue surrounding the shrine of Imam Reza (AS) despite its high dating texture is worn and organic, and because of the proper access and Therefore, attention to the principles of defective passive defense in central area, is of great importance.The purpose of this study was to Urban texture assessment based on the principles of passive defense using factor analytical network process.
Methodology: The purpose of this study, the nature of descriptive and in terms of analysis tools to analyze and problem-solving model is used F'ANP which are functional and objective.
Fandining: the findings of the research show that the main factors of urban texture based on the principles of non-operating defense are stability Lebedy, location of utilities land use, desirable access, safe spaces and permeabilit and the physical stability factor was obtained. The vulnerability zone is mapped through the five dimensions of urban tissue vulnerability in the Noghan neighborhood, and it is clear that vulnerabilities in the northern parts of the neighborhood include the street the martyr Kaveh and Bayhaqi are moderate and in the central parts of the city such as the Noghan river and the holy shrine that is considered the old city's texture is very vulnerable.
Methodology: The purpose of this study, the nature of descriptive and in terms of analysis tools to analyze and problem-solving model is used F'ANP which are functional and objective.
Fandining: the findings of the research show that the main factors of urban texture based on the principles of non-operating defense are stability Lebedy, location of utilities land use, desirable access, safe spaces and permeabilit and the physical stability factor was obtained. The vulnerability zone is mapped through the five dimensions of urban tissue vulnerability in the Noghan neighborhood, and it is clear that vulnerabilities in the northern parts of the neighborhood include the street the martyr Kaveh and Bayhaqi are moderate and in the central parts of the city such as the Noghan river and the holy shrine that is considered the old city's texture is very vulnerable.
Keywords:
References
1. Asadzadeh A, Kotter T, Zebardast E (2015). An augmented approach for measurement of disaster resilience using connective factor analysis and analytic network process (F'ANP) model. Disaster Risk Reduction. 14(4):504-518. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.002]
2. Architectural Urban Design Consultant, Tahas,Buffet around the Shrine of Motahara (2008). Volume 4. [Persian]
3. Bentley Y (2012). Respondent environments, Behzadfar M, Translator, Eighth Edition, Tehran: Center of the University of Science and Technology of Iran Publication. p. 462. [Persian]
4. Chelleri L (2012). From the Resilient City to Urban Resilience. A review essay on understanding and integrating the resilience perspective for urban systems. Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica. 58(2):287-306 [DOI:10.5565/rev/dag.175]
5. Ebrahiminejad M, Zohrehi M (2016). Investigate the Factors Influencing on Shelte Locations Choice Using GIS in Kerman. Administrative Managemen Education and Training (JAMET). 12(6):436-446.
6. Hosseini Amini, Asadi S, Bornafar M (2010). Evaluation of the structure of the city of Langroud for the planning of passive defense. Applied Geosciences Research. 10(12):129-149.
7. FEMA (2007). Site and Urban Design for Security, Guidance against Potential Terrorist Attacks. p. 272.
8. Farzam Shad M, Araghizade A (2012). Principles of planning and designing a safe city from the perspective of non-operating defense. First Edition. Esfehan: Elm Afarin Publication. p. 204. [Persian]
9. Hough M, Spillan J (2005). Crisis Planning: Increasing Effectiveness, Decreasing Discomfort. Business and Economics Research. 3(4):19-24. [DOI:10.19030/jber.v3i4.2762]
10. Kamran H, Hosseini Amini M, Jafari F (2012). Application of non-operating defense in geopolitics and urban planning, Geography. Iranian Geographical Society. 11(36):7-32. [Persian]
11. Kamran H, Amini D, Hossaini Amini H (2013). Application of passive defense in urban housing planning. Urban Regional Studies and Research. 4(15):57-88. [Persian]
12. Lynch K (2014). City Theory. Sixth Edition. Bahreini H, Translator. Tehran: Tehran University Press. p. 680. [Persian]
13. Mir Hashemi R, Seyed E (2010). Urban Planning and Strengthening the City's Vulnerable Elements, Approach to Non-Factor Defense Considerations. Second National Conference on Urban Development, Tenth, No. 4, Spring 2014. pp. 15. [Persian]
14. Mistilis N, Sheldon P (2006). Knowledge Management for Tourism Crises and Disasters. Tourism Review International. 10(1):1-15. [DOI:10.3727/154427206779307330]
15. Nurai H, Rezaei N, Abbaspour RA (2012). Spatial analysis of the performance of communication network in local scale during earthquake considering civil defense aspect. Passive Defense Science and Technology. 2(3)151:160 [Persian]
16. Nugroho BH (2011). Urban Risk Analysis Based on Earthquake Hazar Vulnerability Area in Bantul Regency, Institue Pertanian Bogor, Agricultural university Bogor.
17. Cohen JL (2005). Urban Textures ∣ Yves. Lion: Birkhäuser Publication. p. 160.
18. Zebardast E, Khalili A, Dehghani M (2013), Application of Factor Analysis Method in Identification of Decayed Urban Fabrics An. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. 18(2):27-42. [Persian]
19. Zebardast E (2014). Application of F'ANP in Urban Planning. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. 19(2):23-38. [Persian]
20. Ziviar P, Hosseini Amini H, Doroodi MR (2016). Unenterprise Defense City. First Edition. Tehran: Iranian Geographic Society Publication. p. 399. [Persian]
21. Zebardast E (2013). Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F'ANP) model. Natural Hazards. 65(3):1331-1359. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-012-0412-1]