[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
:: Volume 34, Issue 1 (2019) ::
GeoRes 2019, 34(1): 73-85 Back to browse issues page
An Operational Definition of Affects in Urban Space in the Light of a Methodological Approach
Elham Darban Rezaei *1, Raziye Rezazadeh2, Maryam Ostadi2, Hoseein Akbari3
1- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran , elham.darbanrezaee@gmail.com
2- Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (2917 Views)
Background & Aims: Different urban areas provoke different reactions from people of various cultures. It is key in urban designing to realize the interrelationship of constructed environments and the emotional effects on human behavior. Related investigations are based on environmental psychology and social sciences. Therefore, there is a lack of appropriate evaluation methods in the field. Yet, the literature seriously lacks any systematic academic work or even review of the practical methodology. A valid objective evaluation process is required for public emotional reactions to urban spaces that seek to promote the development of urban areas and the relevant policy making.
The purpose of this study is to provide an operational model for measuring emotions in urban spaces using qualitative analysis methods. This model can be a new human-centered approach that helps people from different areas of knowledge with a new layer of information (related to emotions) in the design and design process to solve the mental health problems of cities.
Methodology: For this purpose and research is applied in terms of its purpose and in terms of its nature and method, it is a multiple case study in a voluntary way. Theoretical literature and data collection are done in a library way, with documents.
The first step in the present study was to conduct a review of research methods in environmental psychology, emotions. The next step was to do a qualitative content analysis of the newest 30 research projects with regard of their measurement instruments and methods.
Conclusion: Based on this research the results revealed, five main stages for measuring emotions in urban space were identified and categorized and, finally, the process of measuring emotions in urban space was presented in the form of an operational model.
Keywords: Emotional Response in Urban Space, Model to Measuring Emotions, Measurement Methods and Instrumentation, Case Study Method
Full-Text [PDF 685 kb]   (1341 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Urban Planning
Received: 2018/07/20 | Accepted: 2019/01/26 | Published: 2019/03/17
1. Atkinson R, Atkinson R (1999). Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology . Zamani R, Beik M, Birashk B, Baraheni B, Shahraray M, Translators. 8th Edition. Harcourt College Publication. [Persian]
2. Beigi S (2010). Investigating the mental and psychological impact of urban bodies on citizens, Case study: Mirdamad Street [Dissertation]. Tarbiat Modarres University, Faculty of Arts and Architecture. Tehran [Persian]
3. Bergner BS, Zeile P, Papastefanou G, Rech W, Streich B (2011). Emotional barrier GIS a new approach to integrate barrier-free planning in urban planning processes. pp. 247-257
4. Bergner BS, Exner JP, Zeile P, Rumberg M (2012). Sensing the city - how to identify recreational benefits of urban green areas with the help of sensor technology. pp. 737-746
5. Bergner BS, Exner JP, Memmel M, Raslan R, Taha D, Talal M, Zeile P (2013). Human sensory assessment methods in urban planning - a case study in alexandria. Proceeding of International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM 2013). pp. 407-417.
6. Berleant A (2018). Aesthetics and Environment: Variations on a Theme. 1st Edition. London, UK: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781351163361]
7. Carbon C, Leder H (2005). The wall inside the brain: Overestimation of distances crossing the former Iron Curtain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12(4):746-750. [DOI:10.3758/BF03196767]
8. Cook EM, Hall SJ, Larson KL (2012). Residential Landscapes as Social-Ecological Systems: A Synthesis of Multi-Scalar Interactions between People and Their Home Environment. Urban Ecosystems. 15(1):19-52. [DOI:10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0]
9. Cummins SK, Jackson RJ (2001). The Built Environmental and Children Health, National Center For Environment. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 48(5):1241-1252. [DOI:10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70372-2]
10. De Botton A (2015). The Architecture of Happiness. Aghaei P, Translator. Third edition. Tehran: Malaek Publication. [Persian]
11. Eshuis J, Edwards A (2013). Branding the city: The Democratic Legitimacy of a New Mode of Governance. Urban Studies. 50(5):1066-1082. [DOI:10.1177/0042098012459581]
12. Esfandabad H (2017). Environment Psychology. 2nd Edition. Tehran: SAMT Publication. [Persian]
13. Exner JP, Broschart D, Steffen D, Zeile P, Schächinger H (2015). SensorMapRT - A System for Real-Time Acquisition, Visualization and Analysis of Mobile Sensor Data in an Urban Context [Conference]. Proceedings Real Corp: 2015, 5-7 May. Ghent, Belgium.
14. Gartner G (2012). Emotional Response to Space as an Additional Concept in Cartography. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). 39(B4):473-476. [DOI:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B4-473-2012]
15. Gifford R (2016). Research Methods for Environmental Psychology. First Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Publication. [DOI:10.1002/9781119162124]
16. Graumann C (2002). The Phenomenological Approach to People-Environment Studies. In: Bechtel R, Churchman A. Handbook of Enviroment Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 95.
17. Handgraaf M, Griffioen A, Willem J (2017). Economic Psychology. In: Handgraaf M, Griffioen A, Willem J, editors. Economic Psychology and Pro‐Environmental Behaviour. First Edition. pp. 2380-2435. [DOI:10.1002/9781118926352.ch27]
18. Hauthal E, Burghardt D (2016). Mapping Space-Related Emotions Out of User-Generated Photo Metadata Considering Grammatical Issues. Cartographic. 53(1):78-90. [DOI:10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000094]
19. Henshaw V, Mould O (2013). Sensing Designed Space: An Exploratory Methodology for Investigating Human Response to Sensory Environments. Journal of Design Research. 11(1):57-71. [DOI:10.1504/JDR.2013.054066]
20. Henshaw V, Mould O, Kentish C, Kilvert E (2012). Emotion in Motion: A Methodology for Investigating Emotional Response to the Streets And Urban Spaces in Hanley, Stoke-on-Trent. Proceedings of the Human Experience in the Natural and Built Environment Conference. 2012, 25 June: Glosgow.
21. Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Consumer Research. 9(2):132-140. [DOI:10.1086/208906]
22. Hughes J (2003). Intelligent Hearts: Emotional Intelligence, Emotional Labour and Informalization. Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester. CLMS Working. 43:1-37.
23. Iaconesi S, Persico O (2013). An Emotional Compass,Harvesting Geo-located Emotional States from User Generated Content on Social Networks and Using them to Create a Novel Experience of Cities. ISIA Design.
24. Iaconesi S, Persico O (2014). Visualising Emotional Landmarks in Cities. arXiv. [DOI:10.1109/IV.2014.87]
25. Jiao L (2015). Urban land density function: A new method to characterize urban expansion. Landscape and Urban Planning. 139:26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.023 [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.017]
26. Kalantari F, Mohd Tahir O, Golkar N (2015). Socio-Cultural Development of Tajan Riverfront, Sari, Iran. Advances in Environmental Biology. 9(27):386-392.
27. Klettner S, Gartner G (2012). Modelling Affective Responses to Space. Proceedings of the Real Corp Tagungsband. 2012, May 14-16: Schwechat.
28. Klettner S, Huang H, Schmidt M (2011). Emomap - Considering Emotional Responses to Space for Enhancing LBS. In Advances in Location-Based Services. 8th International Symposium on Location-Based Services, Vienna.
29. Li X, Hijazi I, Koenig R, Lv Z, Zhong C, Schmitt G (2016). Assessing Essential Qualities of Urban Space with Emotional and Visual Data Based on GIS Technique. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 5(11):218. [DOI:10.3390/ijgi5110218]
30. Saunders J (2011). Globalization, Violence and the Visual Culture of Cities. Linder, christopher (ed.). Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography. 93(3):276-278. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00380.x]
31. Lundy L, Wade R (2011). Integrating sciences to sustain urban ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography. 35(5):653-669. [DOI:10.1177/0309133311422464]
32. Mancini C, Thomas K, Rogers Y, Price BA, Jedrzejczyk L, et al (2009). From Spaces to Places: Emerging Contexts in Mobile Privacy. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM. pp. 1-10. [DOI:10.1145/1620545.1620547]
33. MacDonald G (2014). Bodies Moving and Being Moved: Mapping Affect in Christian Nold's Bio Mapping. [DOI:10.3366/soma.2014.0115]
34. Somatechnics. 4(1):108-132.
35. Matei S, Rokeach S, Qil JL (2001). Fear and Misperception of Los Angeles Urban Space, A Spatial-Statistical Study of Communication-Shaped Mental Maps. Communication Reserch. 28(4):429-463. [DOI:10.1177/009365001028004004]
36. Mazumdar S, Vincent L, Thomas C, Rachel D (2017). The Built Environment and Social Capital: A Systematic Review. Environment and Behavior. 50(2):119-58. [DOI:10.1177/0013916516687343]
37. McAndrew Francis T (1993). Environmental Psychology. Mahmoudi G, Translator. Tehran: Vania Publication. [Persian]
38. Mortazavi S (1988). Environment Psychology and its application. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. [Persian]
39. Nardi PM (2018). Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative Methods. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315172231]
40. Nasar JL (1990). The Evaluative Image of the City. American Planning Association. 56(1):41-53. [DOI:10.1080/01944369008975742]
41. Nasar J (1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Asadi Mahal Chali M, Translator. Tehran: Armanshahr Publication. [Persian]
42. Nold C (2009). Emotional Cartography Technologies of the Self. (Online Book). Last acessed in December 5th 2017.
43. Nold CJ, Jensen O, Harder H (2008). Mapping the City- Reflections on Urban Mapping Methodologies from GPS to Community Dialogue. Departmental Working Paper, Denmark.
44. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Applied Psychology. 88(5):879-903. [DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879] [PMID]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Darban Rezaei E, Rezazadeh R, Ostadi M, Akbari H. An Operational Definition of Affects in Urban Space in the Light of a Methodological Approach. GeoRes. 2019; 34 (1) :73-85
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-555-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 34, Issue 1 (2019) Back to browse issues page
تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4419