[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
Main Menu
Home
Journal Information
About the Journal
Aims & Scopes
Editorial Board
Indexing & Abstracting
Archive
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors
Author's Guide
Reference Guide
Authorship Criteria
Submit an Article
Principle of Transparency
Publication Ethics Statement
Open Access Statement
Copyright
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Registered in


AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 33, Issue 2 (2018) ::
GeoRes 2018, 33(2): 8-21 Back to browse issues page
Humanitarian Interventions and National Interests; Iraq Case Study
Zohre Heidari Beni *1, Ezatollah Ezzati2, Mohamadreza Hafez Nia3, Heidar Lotfi4
1- Department of Political Geography,Faculty of Humanities,Garmsar University, Garmsar, Iran
2- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Research University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities,Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran, Tarbiat Modares University
4- Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Garmsar University, Garmsar, Iran, Faculty of Literature and Humanities
Abstract:   (5215 Views)
Introduction and Background: The idea of human intervention stems from the sense of responsibility of the international community in protecting the population from harming political violence, and this process demonstrates the importance of addressing the fundamental human rights issues in a historical process that has now become a global variable. In fact, with the end of the Cold War and the importance of soft issues such as human rights, humanitarian interventions have been at the center of international attention in protecting communities against states, and in this regard, there have been numerous interventions in the surface of the world, including Iraq, and so on. Therefore, the geopolitical position of countries over time and under the influence of various factors such as military interventions and wars, revolutions, changes in the international system and the global system, and changes in power balances are constantly changing. Nevertheless, humanitarian interventions appear to be largely influenced by the national interests of governments and major powers in international relations, which has been well documented in the US intervention in Iraq in 2003. In fact, the US intervention in Iraq in 2003 seems to be not for humanitarian reasons but for the hegemonic interests of the United States in the international system and the Middle East.
Aims: In this regard, the study seeks to investigate the relationship between the United States intervention in Iraq in 2003 and the hegemonic interests of the United States and link these hegemonic interests to humanitarian goals.
Methodology: The research method is descriptive-analytic and data collection method is library and internet. The central question of this study is based on the relationship between the US intervention in Iraq in 2003, with humanitarian pretexts and US interests in Iraq.
Conclusion: The research hypothesis is based on the idea that the United States has been pursuing its hegemonic interests in the Middle East and Iraq by combining the concepts of the fight against terrorism and attempting to spread liberal democracy with humanitarian intervention.
 
 
Keywords: 2003 War Iraq, United States, Hegemonic Interests, Humanitarian Intervention, Fight Against Terrorism and liberal Democracy.
Full-Text [PDF 1028 kb]   (1539 Downloads)    
Article Type: Qualitative Research | Subject: Political geography
Received: 2018/01/4 | Accepted: 2018/08/14 | Published: 2018/09/17
* Corresponding Author Address: Faculty of Literature and Humanities
References
1. Ayoob M (2002) Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty. Int J Hum Rights,6(1):81–102. Routledge Publisher, London. [DOI:10.1080/714003751]
2. Barr, James.(2011) A Line in the Sand. Britain, France and the Struggle that Shaped the Middle East.London/New York: Simon & Schuster.
3. Bellamy Alex (2009) Responsibility to protect or Trojan horse? The crisis in Darfur and humanitarian intervention after Iraq. In: Rosenthal JH and Barry C (eds) Ethics and international affairs. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
4. Bellamy, Alex. (2003). "Humanitarian Intervention and the Three Traditions", Global Society, Vol.17, NO.1, p 3-21.
5. Blackbum, Robert and Busuttil, Games (1997), Human Rights for the 21st Century, London: Acassell Imprint.
6. Bozo, Frederic(2016) A History of the Iraq Crisis: France, the United States and Iraq,1991–2003, New York: Columbia University Press.
7. Connor, Eileen M. O and Hoffman, David (2005) "Media in Iraq: The Fallacy of Psy-Ops",International Herald Tribune, December 16.
8. Corten, Olivier (2003) Le Retour Des Guerres Preventives, Bruxelles, Labor.
9. Dobos N (2008) Justifying humanitarian intervention for the people who pay for it. Praxis 1(1).Spring Manchester UK: Manchester University.
10. Dobos N (2009) On altruistic war and national responsibility: justifying humanitarian intervention to soldiers and taxpayers. In: Ethical theory and moral practise. Springer, Berlin.
11. Donnelly, J. (2002). "Twentieth Century Realism" in Nardin and D.Mapel (eds), Tradition of International EthicsCambridge: Cmbridge University Press.
12. Goldrick, Dominic Mc (1996), The principle of None – Intervention, Human Rights, The United Nations and the principles of International Law, London and New York: Routledge.
13. Ikenberry, G. John (2006) Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition: Essays on American Power and International Order, London: Polity.
14. Karl, Hoffmann (1927) Oelpolitik und angelsa¨chsischer Imperialismus. Berlin: Ring-Verlag.
15. Katzman, Kenneth (2004) "Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance CRS Report for Congress", CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL31339, Updated October 22.
16. Kissinger, Henry. (1992). Humaniterian Intervention has Its Hazards", International Herald Tribune, 14 December.
17. Krasner, S. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Prinston: Prinston, University press.
18. Lawrence, T. E.(1962) Seven Pillars of Wisdom. A Triumph. London: Penguin Books.
19. Leffler, Melvyn (2004) "Bush's foreign Policy", Foreign Policy, Sept./Oct: 22-8.
20. Mandelbaum, Michel. 2003. "A Perfect Failure; NATO's War Against Yugoslavia", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No.5, 2-8.
21. Mann, M. (2004) "The First Failed Empire of the 21st Century," Review of International Studies, 30:631- 53.
22. Miller RB (2008) Justifications of the Iraq war examined. Ethics Int Affairs, 22.1. Carnegie Council, New York.
23. Ottaway M and Lacina B (2003). International interventions and imperialism: lessons from the 1990s. SAIS Review, vol XXIII, No 2 (Summer–Fall). John Hopkins University Press,Washington D.C. [DOI:10.1353/sais.2003.0051]
24. Parekh, Biko (1997), "Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention",International Science Review.
25. Pillar, Paul R. (2011) Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy. Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
26. Rifaat, Ahmed (1979) International Aggression, Stockholm, Humanities Press.
27. Rosenthal. J.H. (1995). "Biography Ethics and Statecraft" in C. J. Nolan (ed.), Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimention of International Affairs, Weatport, Conn Praeger.
28. Schmidt Brian C. and Williams, Michael C. (2008) 'The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq War: Neoconservatives Versus Realists', Security Studies.
29. Schmitt, Karl. (1996). The Concept of Political, trans. G. Schwab, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Tanca, Antonia (1993) Foreign Armed Intervention in Internal Conflict, London, Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.
31. Wheeler N (2004) Humanitarian intervention after 9/11. In: Anthony Lang (ed) Humanitarian intervention. Georgetown University Press Georgetown, DC.
32. Wight, Martin. (1966). "Western Values in International Relations", in H.Butterfield and M. Wight (eds), Diplomatic Investigation: Essays in the Theory of International PoliticsCambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
33. Wimelius, AE (2009) Humanitarian interventions as neo-colonialism? Perspectives from the Muslim world. Paper for the annual international studies association convention, March 22–25, San Diego, CA. The North–South divide and international studies. Tucson, AZ:International Studies Association.
34. Wright, George.(2003) "Wolfowitz: Iraq War Was About Oil". The Guardian, June 4.
35. Wright, Lawrence.(2006) The Looming Tower. Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. New York: Vintage Books.
36. Zaiter, Haifa.(2012) "Is Iraq's New Alliance With Russia. A Game Changer for Region?". As-Safir Lebanese independent newspaper, Oct 12. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/ 2012/10/is-iraq-and-russias-new-alliance-a-regional-game-changer.html.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari Beni Z, Ezzati E, Hafez Nia M, Lotfi H. Humanitarian Interventions and National Interests; Iraq Case Study. GeoRes 2018; 33 (2) :8-21
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-298-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 33, Issue 2 (2018) Back to browse issues page
تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645