Bilingual
En/Fa
Geographical Research is Published in both Persian and English Full-text.
Volume 39, Issue 1 (2024)
GeoRes 2024, 39(1): 61-68 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2023/12/22 | Accepted: 2024/01/22 | Published: 2024/01/27
Received: 2023/12/22 | Accepted: 2024/01/22 | Published: 2024/01/27
How to cite this article
Poudineh S, Hafez Rezazadeh M, Miri G. Investgating the Status of Urban Regeneration Indicators in Zahedan City. GeoRes 2024; 39 (1) :61-68
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1568-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1568-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
Full-Text (HTML) (84 Views)
Background
With over half of the global population now living in cities, urbanization is projected to reach 70% by 2015. Urban areas face challenges like economic and social decay, worsened by rapid population growth, structural economic shifts, and inadequate housing for low-income residents. These issues necessitate targeted interventions to revitalize aging neighborhoods, reduce degradation, and restore urban vitality.
Previous Studies
Numerous studies have examined urban regeneration. Kowalczyk-Anioł (2023) explored tourism-based urban transformation in Krakow, highlighting tourism as a catalyst for economic and social rejuvenation. Liu et al. (2021) studied collaborative urban regeneration in Chongqing, China, and identified systemic cooperation and public participation as key success factors. Sobhani et al. (2023) analyzed urban regeneration strategies in Miandoab, noting the aggressive strategy’s effectiveness in tackling challenges within decayed urban fabric. Zeidi et al. (2023) focused on improving business districts in Tabriz and found that revitalization could foster local economic growth and infrastructure improvements. Asadi (2022) proposed a sustainable urban regeneration framework for post-COVID-19 Tabriz, emphasizing adaptable and integrated planning, green transportation, and economic diversification.
Aim(s)
The study aims to evaluate urban regeneration in Zahedan based on four indicators: social-cultural conditions, economic prosperity, environmental quality, and physical infrastructure.
Research Type
The research is a survey-based study conducted in 2023.
Research Society
This study focuses on experts in urban planning and citizens of Zahedan.
Place and Time
The research was conducted in Zahedan, Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran, in 2023.
Sampling Method and Number
A purposive sampling method selected 24 urban planning experts for preliminary evaluation. Based on Cochran's formula, a sample of 560 citizens was surveyed through simple random sampling across five regions of Zahedan.
Used Devices & Materials
Data were collected using a 34-item questionnaire evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. The indicators were validated by experts and tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, yielding values from 0.812 to 0.879 across indicators.
Findings by Text
In terms of social-cultural indicator, Zahedan scored favorably with improvements in human resources, citizen culture, and community services. (Mean value: 3.287; Table 1).
Table 1) Evaluation of Social and Cultural Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
Economic conditions were rated poorly, with low scores on job creation, affordable housing, and economic regulations. (Mean value: 2.715; Table 2).
Table 2) Evaluation of Economic Prosperity Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
In terms of environmental quality, Positive assessments were given to green spaces, environmental stability, and waste management. (Mean value: 3.389; Table 3).
Table 3) Evaluation of Environmental Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
In terms of physical infrastructure, good ratings for urban road network and public land distribution, with some weaknesses in relocating high-risk areas. (Mean value: 3.321; Table 4).
Table 4) Evaluation of Physical Quality Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
The analysis highlights inequalities among Zahedan’s districts in terms of sustainable urban regeneration. Indicators such as social and cultural improvement, economic prosperity, environmental enhancement, and physical quality improvement show significant variances, suggesting uneven development levels across districts (Table 5).
Table 5) One-Way ANOVA Test for Assessing the Relationship between Zahedan Districts in Terms of Sustainable Urban Regeneration
Main Comparisons to Similar Studies
In urban regeneration, studies consistently highlight the importance of revitalizing deteriorated areas for economic, social, and environmental improvements. For instance, Kowalczyk-Anioł (2023) noted the role of tourism in Krakow for socio-economic growth, while Liu et al. (2021) emphasized community involvement in Chongqing, China, as crucial for sustainable renewal. Similarly, Sobhani et al. (2023) found that an aggressive regeneration strategy was effective in Miandoab, Iran, to counter challenges in urban decay. Zeidi et al. (2023) reported that regeneration in Tabriz's marketplaces improved economic prospects and infrastructure. In the context of Zahedan, these findings underscore that a sustainable, community-centered approach could effectively address the city's structural, social, and economic issues, aligning with broader urban renewal trends globally.
Suggestions
The study suggests enhancing infrastructure, promoting economic investment, and improving urban management. Specific recommendations include establishing targeted funding, cohesive economic integration strategies, and strengthening collaboration between Zahedan's local government and external investors.
Conclusion
Zahedan performs well in social, environmental, and physical infrastructure aspects but remains economically challenged.
Acknowledgments: The authors declared no acknowledgment.
Ethical Approval: The authors declared no ethical approval.
Conflict of Interests: No issues have been reported by the authors.
Author Contributions: Poudine S (first author), introduction writer/Statistical Analyst/Discussion Writer (35%); Hafez Rezazadeh M (second author), introduction writer/Methodologist/Discussion Writer (35%); Miri Gh (third author), Methodologist/ Introduction Writer (30%)
Funding Sources: No issues have been reported by the authors.
With over half of the global population now living in cities, urbanization is projected to reach 70% by 2015. Urban areas face challenges like economic and social decay, worsened by rapid population growth, structural economic shifts, and inadequate housing for low-income residents. These issues necessitate targeted interventions to revitalize aging neighborhoods, reduce degradation, and restore urban vitality.
Previous Studies
Numerous studies have examined urban regeneration. Kowalczyk-Anioł (2023) explored tourism-based urban transformation in Krakow, highlighting tourism as a catalyst for economic and social rejuvenation. Liu et al. (2021) studied collaborative urban regeneration in Chongqing, China, and identified systemic cooperation and public participation as key success factors. Sobhani et al. (2023) analyzed urban regeneration strategies in Miandoab, noting the aggressive strategy’s effectiveness in tackling challenges within decayed urban fabric. Zeidi et al. (2023) focused on improving business districts in Tabriz and found that revitalization could foster local economic growth and infrastructure improvements. Asadi (2022) proposed a sustainable urban regeneration framework for post-COVID-19 Tabriz, emphasizing adaptable and integrated planning, green transportation, and economic diversification.
Aim(s)
The study aims to evaluate urban regeneration in Zahedan based on four indicators: social-cultural conditions, economic prosperity, environmental quality, and physical infrastructure.
Research Type
The research is a survey-based study conducted in 2023.
Research Society
This study focuses on experts in urban planning and citizens of Zahedan.
Place and Time
The research was conducted in Zahedan, Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran, in 2023.
Sampling Method and Number
A purposive sampling method selected 24 urban planning experts for preliminary evaluation. Based on Cochran's formula, a sample of 560 citizens was surveyed through simple random sampling across five regions of Zahedan.
Used Devices & Materials
Data were collected using a 34-item questionnaire evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. The indicators were validated by experts and tested for reliability using Cronbach’s alpha, yielding values from 0.812 to 0.879 across indicators.
Findings by Text
In terms of social-cultural indicator, Zahedan scored favorably with improvements in human resources, citizen culture, and community services. (Mean value: 3.287; Table 1).
Table 1) Evaluation of Social and Cultural Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
Economic conditions were rated poorly, with low scores on job creation, affordable housing, and economic regulations. (Mean value: 2.715; Table 2).
Table 2) Evaluation of Economic Prosperity Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
In terms of environmental quality, Positive assessments were given to green spaces, environmental stability, and waste management. (Mean value: 3.389; Table 3).
Table 3) Evaluation of Environmental Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
In terms of physical infrastructure, good ratings for urban road network and public land distribution, with some weaknesses in relocating high-risk areas. (Mean value: 3.321; Table 4).
Table 4) Evaluation of Physical Quality Improvement Indicators in Zahedan Using One-Sample T-Test
The analysis highlights inequalities among Zahedan’s districts in terms of sustainable urban regeneration. Indicators such as social and cultural improvement, economic prosperity, environmental enhancement, and physical quality improvement show significant variances, suggesting uneven development levels across districts (Table 5).
Table 5) One-Way ANOVA Test for Assessing the Relationship between Zahedan Districts in Terms of Sustainable Urban Regeneration
Main Comparisons to Similar Studies
In urban regeneration, studies consistently highlight the importance of revitalizing deteriorated areas for economic, social, and environmental improvements. For instance, Kowalczyk-Anioł (2023) noted the role of tourism in Krakow for socio-economic growth, while Liu et al. (2021) emphasized community involvement in Chongqing, China, as crucial for sustainable renewal. Similarly, Sobhani et al. (2023) found that an aggressive regeneration strategy was effective in Miandoab, Iran, to counter challenges in urban decay. Zeidi et al. (2023) reported that regeneration in Tabriz's marketplaces improved economic prospects and infrastructure. In the context of Zahedan, these findings underscore that a sustainable, community-centered approach could effectively address the city's structural, social, and economic issues, aligning with broader urban renewal trends globally.
Suggestions
The study suggests enhancing infrastructure, promoting economic investment, and improving urban management. Specific recommendations include establishing targeted funding, cohesive economic integration strategies, and strengthening collaboration between Zahedan's local government and external investors.
Conclusion
Zahedan performs well in social, environmental, and physical infrastructure aspects but remains economically challenged.
Acknowledgments: The authors declared no acknowledgment.
Ethical Approval: The authors declared no ethical approval.
Conflict of Interests: No issues have been reported by the authors.
Author Contributions: Poudine S (first author), introduction writer/Statistical Analyst/Discussion Writer (35%); Hafez Rezazadeh M (second author), introduction writer/Methodologist/Discussion Writer (35%); Miri Gh (third author), Methodologist/ Introduction Writer (30%)
Funding Sources: No issues have been reported by the authors.
Keywords:
References
1. Abbasi G, Mousavi Y, Ghasemi I, Ahadnejad M (2020). Analysis of regeneration sustainability of the city central texture case study: Central texture of Zanjan city. Journal Sustainable City. 3(2):1-16. [Persian] [Link]
2. Abdollahi V, Beygbabaye B, Ezatpanah B (2021). Recognition of regenerative capabilities in dysfunctional tissues (case study: District 4 of Tabriz metropolitan municipality). Quarterly of Geography & Regional Planning. 10(40):137-151. [Persian] [Link]
3. Asadi A (2022). Development of a framework and model for sustainable urban regeneration in the post-corona era (case study: Tabriz metropolis). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement. 12(44):171-200. [Persian] [Link]
4. CLG (2007). Strong and prosperous communities: The local government white paper. Making it happen: The implementation plan. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. [Link]
5. Ebrahimzadeh E, Kazemeizad S (2013). Satisfaction evaluation and the role of citizen participation in municipal nfrastructure projects case study: Zahedan municipality. Geography and Development. 11(30):1-22. [Persian] [Link]
6. Fanni Z, Tavakolinya J, Beiranvandzadeh M (2020). Analytical-structural application of sustainable urban regeneration, case study: Khorramabad city. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 52(1):181-197. [Persian] [Link]
7. Ghorbanlou H, Masoumi MT, Yazdani MH (2022). Strategic analysis of urban regeneration with an emphasis on social components in peri-urban spaces (case study: The worn-out texture of Tehran's 20th district). Journal of Urban Peripheral Development. 4(2):19-34. [Persian] [Link]
8. Habibi K, Irandoost K, Ahmadi AS (2022). A framework for regeneration of historical contexts with culture-led approach to achieve sustainable tourism development (case study: Urmia historical context). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism. 13(1):105-123. [Persian] [Link]
9. Izadfar N, Rezaei MR, Mohammadi H (2020). Assessment of effective factors on the future of inefficient urban tissue based (case study: Yazd). Geographical Urban Planning Research. 8(2):327-345. [Persian] [Link]
10. Kargar H, Hosseini Z, Eskandari M, Nekooie MA (2021). An overview of the experiences of large-scale urban regeneration interventions and lessons learned to reduce vulnerabilities. Disaster Prevention and Management Knowledge. 11(3):221-237. [Persian] [Link]
11. Karimi Kandezi S (2021). Investigating the role of economic, social, cultural and physical security in urban regeneration (case study: Kashan city). Social Security Studies. 11(64):191-214. [Persian] [Link]
12. Kowalczyk-Anioł J (2023). Rethinking tourism-driven urban transformation and social tourism impact: A scenario from a CEE city. Cities. 134:104178. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104178]
13. Liu G, Fu X, Han Q, Huang R, Zhuang T (2021). Research on the collaborative governance of urban regeneration based on a Bayesian network: The case of Chongqing. Land Use Policy. 109:105640. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105640]
14. Mohseni P, Ziari K, Elahi M, Khatibi M (2023). Development of a regeneration model based on neo-urbanism with an emphasis on the socio-cultural dimension in run-down urban neighborhoods (case study: District 7 of Isfahan). Space Ontology International Journal. 12(3):71-82. [Link]
15. Pooyan S, Tavakolan A, Karegar B (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of sustainable urban regeneration programs on improving the quality of life of residents of informal settlements (case study: Rasht). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning. 17(2):377-390. [Persian] [Link]
16. Pourahmad A, Zangane Shahraki S, Shafaat Gharamaleki T, Farhudi RA (2021). Explaining the pattern of historical texture regeneration with tourism development approach (case study: Tabriz city). Journal of Geography and Planning. 24(74):43-60. [Persian] [Link]
17. Sajadzadeh H, Zolfigol S (2016). Role of urban design in regeneration of ancient district with catalyst approach case study: Kolapa district in Hamedan. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning. 8(31):147-171. [Persian] [Link]
18. Setayeshmehr M, Nasekhian S, Valibeig N (2022). Comparing urban conservation and urban regeneration in the field of change process (from the perspective of contemporary scholars). Bagh-E-Nazar. 19(112):67-80. [Persian] [Link]
19. Shahriyari M (2021). Assessing urban regeneration indicators and its impact on the quality of life of citizens (case study of Sharifabad neighborhood). Geography and Human Relationships. 4(2):336-356. [Persian] [Link]
20. Sobhani N, Hekmatnia H, Fakhar Taze Yazdi F, Salmanzade S (2023). Evaluation of urban worn-out structures with urban regeneration approach (case: Miandoab city). Human Geography Research Quarterly. 55(3):115-139. [Persian] [Link]
21. Statistical Centre of Iran (2015). General population and housing census of Zahedan city. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran. [Persian] [Link]
22. Yetiskul E, Demirel S (2018). Assembling gentrification in Istanbul: The Cihangir neighbourhood of Beyoglu. Urban Studies. 55(15):3336-3352. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0042098017746623]
23. Zeidi S, Mohammadzadeh R, Alipour A (2023). Urban regeneration by business improvement point approach (case study: Raste-Kuche neighborhood of Tabriz). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement. 13(47):97-120. [Persian] [Link]