Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 39, Issue 2 (2024)
GeoRes 2024, 39(2): 129-138 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2023/07/21 | Accepted: 2023/10/15 | Published: 2024/06/5
Received: 2023/07/21 | Accepted: 2023/10/15 | Published: 2024/06/5
How to cite this article
Gholami M, Saberi H, Toghyani S, Shams M. An Investigation into Desirable Urban Spaces and Its Role on Realization of the Theory of the Right to the City in Ahvaz Metropolis. GeoRes 2024; 39 (2) :129-138
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1501-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1501-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- “Tourism Research Center” and “Department of Geography and Urban Planning”, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2- Urban Planning Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3- Department of Geography, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
2- Urban Planning Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3- Department of Geography, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
Abstract (950 Views)
Aims: The concept of the right to the city necessitates that the denizens of every urban center regard the city as their own and actively engage in its affairs. By considering the indices related to the right to the city and examining the indices pertaining to the desirability of urban spaces, this study seeks to investigate the influence of the urban space desirability indices on the realization of the right to the city.
Methodology: The research methodology employed in this study is both applied and descriptive-analytical, with a survey-based nature. The statistical population consisted of individuals over the age of 15 residing in Ahvaz city, with a sample size of 375 people determined using Cochran's formula. To analyze the impact of urban space desirability on the realization of the right to the city, Smart PLS software was utilized.
Findings: The results of the structural equations model reveal the importance of the impact of the variables on one another. The t values derived from the research components exhibit a significantly large value exceeding 1.96, which signifies significance at the 0.01 level. The path coefficients of the components surpass 70%, indicating a strong correlation between the components.
Conclusion: There is a positive and significant relationship between the urban space desirability indices and the degree of realization of the right to the city in Ahvaz city. Among the urban space desirability indices, the index of comfort and tranquility has the highest coefficient of influence among other indicators and among the indices of the right to the city, the index of physical share and the index of control and ownership had the highest coefficients of influence.
Methodology: The research methodology employed in this study is both applied and descriptive-analytical, with a survey-based nature. The statistical population consisted of individuals over the age of 15 residing in Ahvaz city, with a sample size of 375 people determined using Cochran's formula. To analyze the impact of urban space desirability on the realization of the right to the city, Smart PLS software was utilized.
Findings: The results of the structural equations model reveal the importance of the impact of the variables on one another. The t values derived from the research components exhibit a significantly large value exceeding 1.96, which signifies significance at the 0.01 level. The path coefficients of the components surpass 70%, indicating a strong correlation between the components.
Conclusion: There is a positive and significant relationship between the urban space desirability indices and the degree of realization of the right to the city in Ahvaz city. Among the urban space desirability indices, the index of comfort and tranquility has the highest coefficient of influence among other indicators and among the indices of the right to the city, the index of physical share and the index of control and ownership had the highest coefficients of influence.
Keywords:
References
1. Aalbers MB, Gibb K (2014). Housing and the right to the city: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Housing Policy. 14(3):207-213. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14616718.2014.936179]
2. Abdolhi R, Mohammadi A, Haghighatian M (2019). The Study of the impact of urban public space on the dimensions of social welfare (case study: The citizens of Tehran city). Social Development & Welfare Planning. 9(37):28-58. [Persian] [Link]
3. Abu-Dayyeh N, Johnston KM (2018). Public urban space: The linguistic turn. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 5(1):1523515. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23311983.2018.1523515]
4. Agiurre A (2007). Urban space. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosu018]
5. Akbari P, Baharestan O, Shaemi Barzaki A (2014). Impacts of emotional intelligence and organizational citizenship behavior on organizational conflict: A case study. Management and Development Process. 26(4):73-100. [Persian] [Link]
6. Alipour kohi P, Alikaei S, Maddahzad SM (2023). Formulating the conceptual framework of the "right to the city" theory by exploring Lefebvre's thoughts. Quarterly Journal of Intercultural Studies. 17(53):9-30. [Persian] [Link]
7. Behnammorshedi H, Gaed Rahmati S, Eftakhari R, Meshkini A (2022). The right to the city and the pattern of participatory planning An analysis of the social production of urban spaces with emphasis on megamalls of Tehran metropolis. Geography and Development. 20(66):1-34. [Persian] [Link]
8. Beqaj B (2016). Public space, public interest and challenges of urban transformation. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 49(29):320-324. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.087]
9. Bromand M, Toghyani S, Saberi H (2017). Evaluation the impacts of urban elements on formation of behavioral patterns by emphasizing on gendered urban spaces (case study: 2th region of Tehran's municipality). Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management. 16(46):241-260. [Persian] [Link]
10. Dogan U (2023). A comparison of space quality in streets in the context of public open space design: The example of Izmir, Barcelona, and Liverpool. Journal of Urban Affairs. 45(7):1282-1315. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/07352166.2021.1919018]
11. Domaradzka A (2018). Urban social movements and the right to the city: An introduction to the special issue on urban mobilization. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 29(4):607-620. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11266-018-0030-y]
12. Fanni Z, Ahmadi L (2020). Women and seeking "the right to the city" in the gendered sidewalks (case study: District 6, Tehran city). Quarterly Journal of Social Development. 15(1):71-100. [Persian] [Link]
13. Golkar K (2000). Constructive components of urban design quality. Soffeh Journal. 11(32):38-65. [Persian] [Link]
14. Harvey D (2008). The right to the city. In: The city reader. London: Routledge. p. 23-40. [Link]
15. Hosseini A, Fanni Z, Momeni A (2022). Comparative analysis of urban vitality in old and new neighborhoods with the approach of the right to the city: The case study of neighborhoods in Yazd city. Geographical Urban Planning Research. 10(2):29-51. [Persian] [Link]
16. Johnson AJ, Glover TD (2013). Understanding urban public space in a leisure context. Leisure Sciences. 35(2):190-197. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01490400.2013.761922]
17. Kamyarrad S, Hadavand M, Kamyarrad S (2021). Right to the city. Public Law Researsh. 22(70):250-282. [Persian] [Link]
18. KenarKoohi E, Azani M, KhademolHoseiny A, Saberi H (2020). Explanation of the impacts of sociocultural factors on achieving healthy city pattern case study: Behbahan city. Sustainable City. 3(3):1-16. [Persian] [Link]
19. Khezrnezhad P, Pourmohammadi MR, Roostaei S (2020). Analysis of the right to the city in urban public spaces with emphasis on gender equity approach. Case study: Urmia city. Quarterly Journal of Woman & Society. 10(40):195-222. [Persian] [Link]
20. Khodayari Motlagh S, Sharepour M, Tavallai N (2017). A study about the effect of desirability of urban space indicators on the realization of the right to city (the case study: Babolsar). Biquarterly Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions. 4(9):189-225. [Persian] [Link]
21. Khorasani Zadeh F, Saberi H, Momeni M, Mousavi M (2019). Comparative comparison of the of quality of urban public spaces (case study of district 1 and 6 of Isfahan). Quarterly of Geography & Regional Planning. 9(36):465-478. [Persian] [Link]
22. Lynch K (2015). A theory of good city form. Bahrainy SH, translator. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [Persian] [Link]
23. Mahvari P, Ghalehnoee M, Mokhtarzadeh S (2020). Evaluating the quality of urban space based on the place-making approach: Emphasizing on the access quality in the Imam Ali square. Motaleate Shahri. 9(35):47-60. [Persian] [Link]
24. Maroofi S (2020). Making appropriate of urban spaces for socio-cultural activities (case study: Bazaar of Tehran). Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Litreatures and Theories. 1(2):109-117. [Persian] [Link]
25. Modere A, Adhami G (2015). Explanation of the role of public spaces in relation to social capital (case study: Amol). Quarterly Journal of Socio-Cultural Development Studies. 3(4):185-212. [Persian] [Link]
26. Mohammadi M, Changalvaiee Y (2014). Evaluation of urban space quality components on the desirability of walking tourism routes (a case study of prioritizing walking tourism routes in Isfahan city). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU). 4(1):15-32. [Persian] [Link]
27. Montazerolhodjah M, Sharifnejad M, Rajabi M (2018). Assessment of the effect of physical components of urban spaces on sense of security from the viewpoint of the elderly (case study: Khan square, Yazd city). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU). 9(1):91-105. [Persian] [Link]
28. Mottaghi A, Tala H, Ghorbani Sepehr A (2020). Philosophical-conceptual processing of the right to the city from the perspective of urban management. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 52(4):1235-1255. [Persian] [Link]
29. Nabizadeh Zolpirani M, Azimi N, Mohammadpour S (2022). Assessing the quality of urban public spaces from social justice perspective (Case study of Rasht, Iran). Human Geography Research. 54(1): Unknown pages. [Persian] [Link]
30. Pourmohammadi MR, Roostaei S, Khezrnezhad P (2019). Impact of the right to city on sense of belonging among gender groups (case study: Urmia public spaces). Geographical Urban Planning Research. 7(1):1-19. [Persian] [Link]
31. Purcell M (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal. 58(2-3):99-108. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f]
32. Rafieian M, Rezazadeh R, Seifaee M, Ahmadvand Y (2008). Examining the utility and usability of urban public spaces for special social groups (females): A participatory planning approach (a case study: Nabovvat square, Tehran). Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning. 1(1):37-54. [Persian] [Link]
33. Rahbari L, Sharepour M (2011). Ciender and right to the city: A test of Lefebvre's theory. Iranian Journal of Sociology. 14(1):116-141. [Persian] [Link]
34. Rahnamaiee M, Ashrafi Y (2008). Public spaces of the city and its role in the formation of civil society. Journal of Geography. 5(15):23-45. [Persian] [Link]
35. Soltani A, Namdarian AA (2011). Investigation of the role of urban spaces in achieving sustainable development: Describing communication paradigm. Bagh-E Nazar. 8(18):3-12. [Persian] [Link]
36. Statistical Centre of Iran (2016). General census of population and housing. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran. [Persian] [Link]
37. Tamjidi Z, Zarabadi ZSS, Habib F (2022). Identification of the effective components to improve the quality of urban public spaces for children regarding the conceptual model of the right to the city (case study: Tehran). Motaleate Shahri. 11(44):115-130. [Persian] [Link]
38. UNESCO, UN-HABITAT (2005). Discussion paper, urban policies and the right to the city. Paris: UNESCO. [Link]
39. Zareshahabadi A, Gholami M (2019). Relationship between the right to city and legalism (case of study: Citizens 18 years of age and above of the city of Yazd). Journal of Sociological Urban Studies. 9(32):33-56. [Persian] [Link]