Volume 38, Issue 1 (2023)
GeoRes 2023, 38(1): 19-25 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2023/01/1 | Accepted: 2023/03/12 | Published: 2023/03/20
Received: 2023/01/1 | Accepted: 2023/03/12 | Published: 2023/03/20
Rights and permissions
1- Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Yasouj University, Yasuj, Iran
2- Department of Economics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
3- Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
2- Department of Economics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
3- Department of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
Abstract (722 Views)
Aims: Housing is one of the basic and important dimensions of quality of life to achieve development, it is urban and regional stable and plays a vital role in the Economic development of Society. Since the need for housing is one of the most basic human needs, this research it was done with the aim of ranking the status of construction and housing industry in Iran.
Methodology: In this retrospective study, the data of the construction and housing industry in 2018 was collected in 31 provinces of Iran through statistical yearbooks. Analysis the indicators of this industry using the preference selection index which is one of the latest multi-criteria decision-making techniques were carried out.
Findings: Tehran and Isfahan provinces were placed in the very preferred group with Preference selection index of 0.7076 and 0.5747 respectively, and the condition of building and housing indicators in these provinces was evaluated as good. The provinces of Bushehr, Golestan, Semnan, Ilam, Kohgiluyeh and Boyar Ahmad were in the low preference group with Preference selection index of 0.0632, 0.0624, 0.0537, 0.0303 and 0.0276 respectively, and the condition of building and their housing was bad.
Conclusion: Preference selection index is a suitable method for ranking the situation Building and housing in Iran. The provinces of Tehran and Isfahan are best and Ilam and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad have the worst condition of buildings and housing.
Methodology: In this retrospective study, the data of the construction and housing industry in 2018 was collected in 31 provinces of Iran through statistical yearbooks. Analysis the indicators of this industry using the preference selection index which is one of the latest multi-criteria decision-making techniques were carried out.
Findings: Tehran and Isfahan provinces were placed in the very preferred group with Preference selection index of 0.7076 and 0.5747 respectively, and the condition of building and housing indicators in these provinces was evaluated as good. The provinces of Bushehr, Golestan, Semnan, Ilam, Kohgiluyeh and Boyar Ahmad were in the low preference group with Preference selection index of 0.0632, 0.0624, 0.0537, 0.0303 and 0.0276 respectively, and the condition of building and their housing was bad.
Conclusion: Preference selection index is a suitable method for ranking the situation Building and housing in Iran. The provinces of Tehran and Isfahan are best and Ilam and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad have the worst condition of buildings and housing.
Keywords:
References
1. Azevedo NJD, Silva JJR, Silva PMW (2010). Definition of indicators for sustainable social housing in search of a model. International Journal for Housing Science. 34(2):79-92. [Link]
2. Cattaneo MD, Galiani S, Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Titiunik R (2007). Housing, health and happiness. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 1(1):75-105. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/pol.1.1.75]
3. Dwyer RE (2007). Expanding homes and increasing inequalities: U.S. housing development and the residential segregation of the affluent. Social Problems. 54(1):23-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23]
4. Fani Z, Koozegar L, Samani Majd A (2020). Comparative analysis of sustainable housing indices in old and new urban texture (Case study: Texture of Atabak and Punak neighborhoods in Tehran). Research and Urban Planning. 11(42):137-152. [Persian] [Link]
5. Gan X, Zuo J, Wu P, Wang J, Chang R, Wen T (2017). How affordable housing becomes more sustainable? A stakeholder study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 162:427-437. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.048]
6. Haffner M, Boumeester H (2010). The affordability of housing in the Netherlands: A increasing income gap between renting and owning. Housing Studies. 25(6):799-820. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02673037.2010.511472]
7. Henilane I (2016). Housing concept and analysis of housing classification. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management. 4:168-179. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/bjreecm-2016-0013]
8. Himmelberg C, Mayer C, Sinai T (2005). Assessing high house prices: Bubbles, fundamentals and misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19(4):67-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/089533005775196769]
9. Jian S, Ying S (2017). Preference selection index method for machine selection in a flexible manufacturing cell. MATEC Web of Conferences. 139(00167):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201713900167]
10. Li D, Chen Y, Chen H, Guo K, Eddie CMH, Jay Y (2016). Assessing the integrated sustainability of a public rental housing project from the perspective of complex eco-system. Habitat International. 53:546-555. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.01.001]
11. Lin Y, Zhang X, Geertman S (2015). Toward smart governance and social sustainability For Chinese migrant communities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 107(16):389-399. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.074]
12. Lin J (2011). The development of affordable housing: a case study in Guangzhou city, China, department of real estate and construction management division of building and real estate economics. Stockholm: Master of Science Thesis. [Link]
13. Maniya K, Bhatt MG (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials and Design. 31(4):1785-1789. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020]
14. Marsousi N, Ali Akbari I, Sefahan A, Bustan Ahmadi V (2021). Spatial analysis of physical characteristics of urban housing with emphasis on inequality within the region (Case study: 22 districts of Tehran metropolis). Quarterly of Research and Urban Planning. 12(45):36-21. [Persian] [Link]
15. Moore E, Skaburskis A (2004). Canada's increasing housing affordability burdens. Housing Studies. 19(3):395-413. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0267303042000204296]
16. Pamela M, Blumenthal John R, McGinty Pendall R (2016). Strategies for increasing housing supply in high-cost cities. Washington DC: Urban Institute. [Link]
17. Quigley JM, Raphael S (2004). Is housing unaffordable: Why isn't it more affordable? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 18(1):191-214. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/089533004773563494]
18. Ross N, Bowen PA, Lincoln D (2010). Sustainable housing for low-income communities: lessons for South Africa in local and other developing world cases. Construction Management and Economics. 28(5):433-449. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01446190903450079]
19. Saldaña Márquez H, Gámez García DC, Gómez Soberón JM, Arredondo Rea SP, Corral Higuera R, Gómez Soberón MC (2019). Housing indicators for sustainable cities in middle-income countries through the residential urban environment recognized using single-family housing rating systems. Sustainability. 11(16):1-29. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su11164276]
20. Salzer C, Wallbaum H, Lopez LF, Kouyoumji JL (2016). Sustainability of social housing in Asia: A holistic multi-perspective development process for Bamboo-based construction in the Philippines. Sustainability. 8(2):1-26. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su8020151]
21. Statistics Center of Iran [Internet]. Statistical yearbook of the country (2018). Tehran: Publications of the Directorate of Public Relations and International Cooperation [Cited 2022, 14 August]. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook/Statistical-Yearbook-2018-2019. [Persian] [Link]
22. Streimikiene D (2015). Quality of life and housing. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(2):140-145. [Link] [DOI:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.491]
23. Tosics I (2004). European urban development: Sustainability and the role of housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 19:67-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/B:JOHO.0000017707.53782.90]
24. Wakely P (2014). Urban public housing strategies in developing countries: Whence and whither paradigms, policies, programmes and projects. London: Development Planning Unit, The Bartlett University College London. [Link]
25. Winston N, Eastaway MP (2007). Sustainable housing in the urban context: International Sustainable development indicator sets and housing. Social Indicators Research. 87(2):211-221. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11205-007-9165-8]