[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
Main Menu
Home
Journal Information
About the Journal
Aims & Scopes
Editorial Board
Indexing & Abstracting
Archive
All Issues
Current Issue
For Authors
Author's Guide
Reference Guide
Authorship Criteria
Submit an Article
Principle of Transparency
Publication Ethics Statement
Open Access Statement
Copyright
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Registered in


AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 38, Issue 1 (2023) ::
GeoRes 2023, 38(1): 73-82 Back to browse issues page
Stakeholder Conflicts in Regeneration of Urban Spaces; a Case Study of 30 Tir Street of Tehran, Iran
H. Gheysari1, A. Modiri *1, H. Kalantari Khalilabad2
1- Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Academic Jihad Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (653 Views)
Aims: One of the obstacles facing the regeneration of urban spaces is the failure of regeneration projects to resolve the conflicts of the stakeholders, which leads to delays their exploitation for several years. The purpose of this research was to identify the existing conflicts between the stakeholders of "30-Tir Street" and to analyzing about how these conflicts are understood and valued among the stakeholders.
Methodology: This survey research was conducted with a qualitative-quantitative approach in 2022 in 5 groups of stakeholders and those related to the space of "30-Tir Street" in Tehran. 20 people from the studied population were selected in the qualitative part by purposive sampling and 190 people were selected in the quantitative part by available sampling. Data analysis was implemented using open and axial coding method and mean comparison test and one-way Anova.
Findings: 64 conflicts between 5 groups of main stakeholders were identified, 41 of which were conflicts of interests and the rest were behavioral, cognitive and normative conflicts. The pattern of stakeholders' encounter with each other in 30-Tir Street" was a bipolar type in which the mayor and stallholders were on one side and residents, shopkeepers, pedestrians and other stakeholders were on the other side. A significant difference was observed between the perceived conflicts between the stakeholder groups (p=0.001).
Conclusion: "30-Tir Street" project is a kind of gentrification of the public space for the function of urban tourism and is not concerned with preserving the originality and cultural identity of this urban texture. In this program, only the interests of tourists and citizens whose purpose is to have fun and spend their free time have been taken into account and the original identity of Street has been ignored.
Keywords: Conflict Management, Key Stakeholders, Urban Regeneration, Tehran
Full-Text [PDF 1880 kb]   (415 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Urban Planning
Received: 2023/01/15 | Accepted: 2023/03/8 | Published: 2023/04/9
* Corresponding Author Address: Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ashrafi Esfahani Street, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1469669191 (atmodiri@gmail.com)
References
1. Abachi A, Yousofi A, Kermani M (2018). The government-oriented approach to urban regeneration and dependent gentrification: Performance analysis of key stakeholders in the renovation of the fabric surrounding the Holy Shrine in Mashhad. Journal of Community Development. 11 (1):75-94. [Persian] [Link]
2. Ariana A, Kazemian G, Mohammadi M (2020). Conflict management model of urban regeneration stakeholders in Iran (Case study: Hemmat- abad neighborhood of Isfahan). Motaleate Shahri. 9(35):123-143. [Persian] [Link]
3. Bahadorestani A, Naderpajouh N, Sadiq R (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242(118402):1-20. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118402]
4. Bahadorinejad M, Zaker Haghighi K (2016). Renewal process in historical fabrics using regeneration approach (A case study of Haji neighborhood in historical areas of Hamedan). Haft Hesar Journal of Environment Study. 5(18):5-18. [Persian] [Link]
5. Chinyio E, Olomolaiye P (2009). Construction stakeholder management. New Jersey: Wiley Publishing. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/9781444315349]
6. Coleman PT, Deutsch M, Marcus EC (2014). The handbook of conflict resolution. New Jersey: Wiley Publishing. [Link]
7. Creswell JW (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. New York: Sage Publication. [Link]
8. Erfani G, Roe M (2020). Institutional stakeholder participation in urban redevelopment in Tehran: An evaluation of decisions and actions. Land Use Policy. 91(1):1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104367]
9. Eyiah-Botwe E, Aigbavboa C, Thwala W (2016). Mega construction projects: Using stakeholder management for enhanced sustainable construction. American Journal of Engineering Research. 5(1):80-86. [Link]
10. Ghaderi F, Rafieian M, Mahdinia M (2019). Analysis of urban regeneration management from the point of view of conflicts and interests of stakeholders- case study: Saman region of Mashhad [Dissertation].Tehran: University of Tarbiat Modarres. [Persian] [Link]
11. Haghighat Naeini G, Farahani H, Fanaei S (2022). Pathology of urban regeneration programs in terms of mental health: The experts' perspective. Geographical Researches. 37(3):327-337. [Persian] [Link]
12. Kalantari Khalil Abad H, Pourahmad A, Mousavi SR, Shiripour M (2014). Institutional challenges to sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of Haft Shahr. 4(47-48):112-121. [Persian] [Link]
13. Kleniewski N, Thomas A (2019). Cities, change, and conflict: A political economy of urban life. New York: Routledge Publications. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780429022920]
14. Lam P, Chan E, Chau C, Poon JC, Chun KP (2011). Environmental management system vs green specifications: How do they complement each other in the construction industry?. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(3):788-795. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.030]
15. Landorf Ch (2011). Evaluating social sustainability in historic urban environments. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 17(5):463-477. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/13527258.2011.563788]
16. Leary ME, McCarthy J (2013). The routledge companion to urban regeneration. London: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203108581]
17. Lochrie S (2016). Engaging and marketing to stakeholders in world heritage site management: A United Kingdom multiple case study perspective. Journal of Marketing Management. 32(15-16):1392-1418. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1186107]
18. Mottaghi T, Rafi'eian M, Saremi H (2020). Stakeholder conflict analysis in urban historic areas: Sangelaj buffer zone plan in Tehran as a case study. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies. 9(17):197-218. [Persian] [Link]
19. PMBOK Guide (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute Press. [Link]
20. Rastgar Hosseini M, Rafieian M, Taghvaee A (2016). The effect of large-scale urban commercial projects on the tendency of social spatial exclusion of the peripheral residents (Case example of Majd Mashhad project). [Dissertation]. Tehran: University of Tarbiat Modarres. [Persian] [Link]
21. Ringsberg H, Brettmo A, Browne M (2023). Exploring Swedish urban freight stakeholders' interests in public spaces. Cities. 133:1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104131]
22. Roberts P, Sykes H (2008). Urban regeneration, a handbook, british urban regeneration association. London: SAGE Publications. [Link] [DOI:10.4135/9781446219980]
23. Roberts P, Sykes H, Granger R (2017). Urban regeneration. London: Sage Publications. [Link] [DOI:10.4135/9781473921788]
24. Sarkheili E, Rafieian M, Taghvaee A (2016). Review the conflict management pattern of beneficiaries and influentials in megaprojects of Mashhad city. Geography and Development. 14(45):141-158. [Persian] [Link]
25. Soma K, Dijkshoorn-Dekker M, Polman N (2018). Stakeholder contributions through transitions towards urban sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society. 37:438-450. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.003]
26. Spiess W, Felding F (2008). Conflict prevention in project management: Strategies, methods, checklists and case studies. New York: Springer Publications. [Link]
27. Stryjakiewicz T, Kudłak R, Ciesiółka P, Kołsut B, Motek P (2018). Urban regeneration in Poland's non-core regions. European Planning Studies. 26(2):316-341. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09654313.2017.1361603]
28. Tallon A (2013). Urban regeneration in the UK paperback. London: Routledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203802847]
29. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2010). Handbook of Mixed Methods in social and Behavioral Research. New York: SAGE Publications. [Link] [DOI:10.4135/9781506335193]
30. Toukola S, Ahola T (2022). Digital tools for stakeholder participation in urban development projects. Project Leadership and Society. 3:1-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.plas.2022.100053]
31. Vandenbussche L (2018). Mapping stakeholders' relating pathways in collaborative planning processes; A longitudinal case study of an urban regeneration partnership. Planning Theory and Practice. 19(4):534-557. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14649357.2018.1508737]
32. Yu T, Liang X, Qiping SG, Shi Q, Wang G (2019). An optimization model for managing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 212:537-547. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.071]
33. Zhuang T, Qiana QK, Visschera HJ, Elsingaa MG, Wub W (2019). The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: The case of Chongqing. Cities. 92:47-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.014]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gheysari H, Modiri A, Kalantari Khalilabad H. Stakeholder Conflicts in Regeneration of Urban Spaces; a Case Study of 30 Tir Street of Tehran, Iran. GeoRes 2023; 38 (1) :73-82
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1443-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 38, Issue 1 (2023) Back to browse issues page
تحقیقات جغرافیایی Geographical Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645