Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 37, Issue 3 (2022)
GeoRes 2022, 37(3): 305-312 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2022/04/30 | Accepted: 2022/07/6 | Published: 2022/07/1
Received: 2022/04/30 | Accepted: 2022/07/6 | Published: 2022/07/1
How to cite this article
Nazemi A, Seyedalhoseni S, Daneshvar M, Saghatoleslami A. Discovering the Roots of the Inefficiencies of the Rules and Regulations of Iran's Urban Development Plans. GeoRes 2022; 37 (3) : 1
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1346-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1346-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran, Mashhad, Amoozgar Boulevard, Amoozgar 27, No. 7, 6th floor, Unit 16
2- Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract (921 Views)
Aims: There are many criticisms and suggestions in the field of urban planning laws and rules and regulations of urban development plans, but the roots and context of the emergence of such rules that have been criticized or proposed to amend them are not clear and have not been addressed. The purpose of this study was to reach the sources of problems and inefficiencies in the rules and regulations of Iran's urban development plans.
Methodology: Data collection was done by documentary research method, in the form of open codes related to criticisms, inefficiencies, and suggestions presented in 200 written documents between 2000 and the end of 1400. Axial organization and coding, code selection, and categorization were performed following the data-based research method and with the help of Access 2016 software. The research process and results were confirmed with the participation of 5 experts and evaluation based on 9 Cresol questions.
Findings: The study showed that the roots of the mentioned inefficiencies go back to the category or fields of vision, governance structure and organization, a system of formulation and approval, rules-rules and regulations, planning institutions, and Legislative authorities each of which has smaller categories and their central codes are theoretical base, manpower, theoretical shortcomings, the inadequacy of supreme laws, shortcomings of institutional elements and approach and theoretical shortcomings, respectively.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the shortcomings and inefficiencies of the rules and regulations of Iran's urban development plans have multiple roots that, when clarified, pave the way for their correction. The axis of the six constructive fields is paradigm transition, respectively; Politics and lack of cooperation and coordination; Participation, the interdisciplinary nature of urban planning laws, inconsistency of elements and inconsistency of views and approaches, which have been the cause of inefficiencies due to inadequacy in words and lack of common language.
Methodology: Data collection was done by documentary research method, in the form of open codes related to criticisms, inefficiencies, and suggestions presented in 200 written documents between 2000 and the end of 1400. Axial organization and coding, code selection, and categorization were performed following the data-based research method and with the help of Access 2016 software. The research process and results were confirmed with the participation of 5 experts and evaluation based on 9 Cresol questions.
Findings: The study showed that the roots of the mentioned inefficiencies go back to the category or fields of vision, governance structure and organization, a system of formulation and approval, rules-rules and regulations, planning institutions, and Legislative authorities each of which has smaller categories and their central codes are theoretical base, manpower, theoretical shortcomings, the inadequacy of supreme laws, shortcomings of institutional elements and approach and theoretical shortcomings, respectively.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the shortcomings and inefficiencies of the rules and regulations of Iran's urban development plans have multiple roots that, when clarified, pave the way for their correction. The axis of the six constructive fields is paradigm transition, respectively; Politics and lack of cooperation and coordination; Participation, the interdisciplinary nature of urban planning laws, inconsistency of elements and inconsistency of views and approaches, which have been the cause of inefficiencies due to inadequacy in words and lack of common language.
Article number: 1
References
1. Adinehwand A, Aliyan M (2016). Good urban governance: The prioritization of components and indicators.strategy. 25(4):305-338. [Persian] [Link]
2. Afsharniya A, Mirzade S (2016). Solutions to determine the optimum level and size of the city limit in the master plans of the cities with a population of less than 50 thousand inhabitants. Motaleate Shahri. 5(20):65-78. [Persian] [Link]
3. Barati N (2006). Challenges have to be faced in the context of urbanism in Iran at the beginning of the 21th century. The Scientific journal in the Field of Theoretical Studies of Art and Architecture (BAGH-E NAZAR). 3(6):5-29. [Persian] [Link]
4. Bonakdar A, Gharai F, Barakpur N (2012). Urban design documents in the planning system in Iran and England: A comparative study. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning. 4(8):147-167. [Persian] [Link]
5. Daneshvar M, Bandarabad A (2013). Studying about adaptation new master plan with specifications of structural strategic plan (Case study: Mashhad's comprehensives Plan). Hoviatshahr. 7(14):83-92. [Persian] [Link]
6. Dabirnia A, Naghavi F (2018). Application of the legislative process in the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran with the theory of legislation as planning in order to implement the divine laws. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge. 7(19):113-134. [Persian] [Link]
7. Elyaszadeh Moghaddam N (2011). Surveying and feasibility of replacement of structural-strategic model with urban comprehensive planning model in Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 4(6):35-48. [Persian] [Link]
8. Hashemi Toghroljerdi S M (2017). Evaluation and analysis of jurisprudential-legal entities in the structure of high council of urbanism with a corrective proposal in the courts of inquiry and the specialized commission of the council. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture Iran University of Science & Technology. 5(2):34-54. [Persian] [Link]
9. Hoseynzadehdalir K, Sadrmusavi M, Heydarichiyaneh R, Rezatabe S (2012). An introduction to the new approach to urban development strategy (CDS) in the urban planning process with emphasis on the challenges of comprehensive plans in Iran. Journal of Geographical Space. 0(36):173-210. [Persian] [Link]
10. Jabareen Y (2017). The right to space production and the right to necessity: Insurgent versus legal rights of palestinians in jerusalem. SAGE Journals. 16(1):6-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1473095215591675]
11. Jamhiri M, Zabihi H, Majedi H (2008). The executive system of the missing link of urban programs in Iran an analysis of the executive system of urban development plans and programs. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 10(2):87-98. [Persian] [Link]
12. Kazemian G, Kamyar G (2020). The impact of urban management financing methods on the right to the city in Tehran metropolis. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary va Shahrsazi. 25(1):17-29. [Persian] [Link]
13. Majedi H (2013). Structural -Strategic planning theory. Hoviatshahr. 6(11):17-26. [Persian] [Link]
14. Meneses-Reyes R, Caballero-Juárez J A (2014). The right to work on the street: Public space and constitutional rights. SAGE Journal. 13(4):370-386. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1473095213503967]
15. Mostofi A, Sarvari H, Hanaee T, Mahdinia M (2022). Identifying urban planning incentive from the perspective of the private and public sector for the formation of public-private partnership in Mashhad. Geographical Research. 37(1):91-99. [Persian] [Link]
16. Nazemi G, Rezazadeh R, Saghatoleslami A, Sarvari H (2021). The coordinated planning theory (The interacted theory with official structural elements of Iran's urban planning environment). Geographical Research. 36(2):125-136. [Persian] [Link]
17. Rezaei M R, Rahimi E (2013). The causes of land use change and its impact on municipal services in urban detailed plans case study Marvdasht. Research and Urban Planning. 4(13):77-96. [Persian] [Link]
18. Salehi E (2007). The role of urban planning rules and regulations in realizing a good city and sustainable urban development (Case study: Tehran). Journal of Environmental Studies. 32(40):51-62. [Persian] [Link]
19. Sarrafi M, Abdollahi M (2008). Analysis of the concept of citizenship and evaluation of its status in the urban laws, regulations and management. Geographical Research Quarterly. 40(2):115-124. [Persian] [Link]
20. Sayyaf Zadeh A, Badri Far M (2009). The necessity to reform management of urban development in Tehran. Quarterly Geographical Journal of Territory. 5(18):35-53. [Persian] [Link]
21. Shakouri Asl S, Rafieian M (2016). Usage of spatial decision support systems in urban planning. HOVIATSHAHR. 9(24):35-42. [Link]
22. Tahanzarif H, Hadizade A (2018). The nature of the development plan laws in the legal system of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge. 7(21):101-124. [Persian] [Link]
23. Talebi M, Rahnemaei M, Ghorbaninezhad R (2021). Pathology of barriers to good urban governance in middle cities case study: Neyshabur city. Journal Sustainable City. 3(4):43-57. [Persian] [Link]
24. Yazdani S, Fattahizadeh F, Sheikholeslami A, Etemad G (2021). Presenting a model of sustainable urban regeneration in historical contexts with an integrated approach case study: Darvazeh Rey neighborhood and Qom bazaar area. Geographical Research. 36(4):437-446. [Persian] [Link]
25. Zangiabadi A, Abdollahi M, Salekghahgharokhi R, Ghasemzadeh G (2013). Evaluation of factors affecting the unfeasibility of comprehensive urban plans in Iran and related challenges case study: Historical-cultural axis of region 6 of Tabriz. Research and Urban Planning. 5(18):41-58 [Persian] [Link]