Persian
Volume 37, Issue 2 (2022)                   GeoRes 2022, 37(2): 213-219 | Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Original Research |
Subject:

Print XML Persian Abstract PDF HTML

History

How to cite this article
Janjani N, Azizi Z, Dehshiri M, Baikpour S. Effects of aspect and elevation on carbon sequestration process in Tehran Suburbs vegetation. GeoRes 2022; 37 (2) :213-219
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1302-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Department of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Biology, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Science and Research Branch, Daneshgah Blvd, Simon Bulivar Blvd, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1477893855. (zazizi@srbiau.ac.ir)
Abstract   (894 Views)
Aims: Altitude and geographical directions in mountainous areas change at short distances and thus create high complexity in the physiography of the region. By changing the physiography, there will be a change in the diversity and structure of the vegetation and the amount of carbon sequestration. This study investigated the effect of changes in altitude, slope and direction of the southern Alborz mountain range on the outskirts of Tehran on carbon sequestration.
Methodology: The physiographic and landform diversity map was prepared based on the digital model of the altitude of the region and taking into account the altitude factor and changes in the direction of the slope and slope. Based on this information layer, soil and vegetation sampling was performed in each of the physiographic forms in the field. Changes in soil carbon dioxide and its relationship with vegetation were investigated based on physiographic parameters.
Findings: The results showed that the direction of slope, slope and altitude is directly related to the amount of carbon sequestration of vegetation. The western geographical direction and low slopes showed the highest carbon sequestration. Also, with increasing altitude without considering the direction factor and slope, the amount of soil carbon had a significantly decreasing trend. The results of root organic carbon analysis of the studied samples showed that the lowest amount of root organic carbon was observed in Ferula stipa and the highest amount of root organic carbon was observed in Ferula psathyrostachys.
Conclusion: Altitude, slope and geographical direction of the slopes affect the rate of carbon sequestration. In situations where air pollution and climate change in a way that changes in temperature and rainfall are noticeable can have a negative effect on the carbon sequestration cycle. This effect will be especially greater on the southern and eastern slopes.
Keywords:

References
1. Abdi NA, Maddah Arefi H, Zahedi Amiri G (2008). Estimation of carbon sequestration in Astragalus rangelands of Markazi province (case study: Malmir rangeland in Shazand region). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research. 15(2):269-282. [Persian] [Link]
2. Agren G, Andersson F (2012). Terrestrial ecosystem ecology: principles and applications. Ottawa: NRC Research Press. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511894572]
3. Azizi Z (2018). Estimating crown biomass of oak trees using terrestrial photogrammetry in Zagros Forests. Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 167-169. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-01440-7_39]
4. Azizi Z, Montazeri Z (2018). Effects of microtopography on the spatial pattern of woody species in West Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 11(10):1-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12517-018-3588-1]
5. Azizi Z, Hosseini A, Ranmanesh Y (2018). Estimating biomass of single oak trees using terrestrial photogrammetry. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 19(4):81-93. [Persian] [Link]
6. Badehian Z, Mansouri M (2017). Determine the amount of carbon sequestration in rangeland species (case study: Atriplex canescens). Human & Environment. 15(4):1-10. [Persian] [Link]
7. Bahrami B, Efanzadeh R, Moetamedi J (2014). Effects of species diversity changes on soil organic matter particle of mountainous rangeland of West Azerbaijan. Natural Ecosystems of Iran. 5(3):39-49. [Persian] [Link]
8. Beniston JW, DuPont ST, Glover JD, Lal R, Dungate JA (2014). Soil organic carbon dynamics75 years after land-use change in perennial grassland and annual wheat agricultural systems. Biogeochemistry. 120:37-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10533-014-9980-3]
9. Bruce JP, Frome M, Haites E, Joanne H, Lal R, Faustion K (1999). Carbon sequestration in soils. Journal of soil and water conservation. 54(1):382-389. [Link]
10. Faraji, F, Alijanpour A, Sheidai Karkaj E, (2019). Motamedi, J. Effect of fire and rangeland banqueting on soil carbon sequestration in Atbatan summer rangelands, East Azerbaijan province. ECOPERSIA. 7(1):29-37. [Link]
11. Fischer H, Michler B, Ewald J (2014). Environmental, spatial and structural components in the composition of mountain forest in the Bavarian Alps. Folia Geobot. 49:361-384. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12224-013-9185-x]
12. Gao YH, Luo P, Wu N, Chen H, Wang GX (2007). Grazing intensity impacts on carbon sequestration in an alpine meadow on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. 6:642-647. [Link] [DOI:10.15666/aeer/0603_069079]
13. Gomroki M, Jafari M, Sadeghian S, Azizi Z (2017). Application of intelligent interpolation methods for DTM generation of forest areas based on LiDAR data. PFG-Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science. 85:227-241. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s41064-017-0025-0]
14. Han G, Hao X, Zhao M, Wang M, Ellert BH, Willms W, et al. (2008). Effect of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 125(1-4):21-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2007.11.009]
15. Hansen AJ, Rotella JJ, Kraska MPV, Brown D (2000). Spatial patterns of primary productivity in the Greater Yellow Stone ecosystem. Landscape Ecology. 15:505-522. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1008127228878]
16. Haring T, Dietz E, Osenstetter S, Koschitzki T, Schroder B (2012). Spatial disaggregation of complex soil map units: a decision-tree based approach in Bavarian forest soils. Geoderma. 185-186:37-47. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.04.001]
17. Kang S, Doh S, Lee D, Lee D, Jin V, Kimball J (2003). Topographic and climatic controls on soil respiration in six temperate mixed-hardwood forest slopes. Global Change Biology. 9(10):1427-1437. [Link] [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00668.x]
18. Kelsey KC, Wickland KP, Striegl RG, Neff JC (2012). Variation in soil carbon dioxide efflux at two spatial scales in a topographically complex Boreal forest. Arctic Antarctic Alpine Res. 44(4):457-468. [Link] [DOI:10.1657/1938-4246-44.4.457]
19. Kirchen G, Calvaruso C, Granier A, Redon PO, van der Heijden G, Breda N, et al. (2017). Local soil type variability controls the water budget and stand productivity in a beech forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 390:89-103. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.024]
20. Kobler J, Zehetgruber B, Dirnbock T, Jandl R, Mirtl M, Schindlbacher A (2019). Effects of aspect and altitude on carbon cycling processes in a temperate mountain forest catchment. Landscape Ecology. 34:325-340. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10980-019-00769-z]
21. Konz N, Baenninger D, Konz M, Nearing M, Alewell C (2010). Process identification of soil erosion in steep mountain. Hydroly and Earth System Sciences. 14(1):675-686. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/hess-14-675-2010]
22. Rehschuh R, Mette T, Menzel A, Buras A (2017). Soil properties affect the drought susceptibility of Norway spruce. Dendrochronologia. 45:81-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.dendro.2017.07.003]
23. Riveros-Iregui DA, McGlynn BL, Emanuel RE, Epstein HE (2012). Complex terrain leads to bidirectional responses of soil respiration to inter-annual water availability. Global Change Biology. 18(2):749-756. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02556.x]
24. Rodeghiero M, Cescatti A (2005). Main determinants of forest soil respiration along an elevation/temperature gradient in the Italian Alps. Global Change Biology. 11(7):1024-1041. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00963.x]
25. Schuman GE, Janzen HH, Herrick JE (2002). Soil carbon information and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands. Environmental Pollution. 116(3):391-396. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00215-9]
26. Smith L, Eissenstat D, Kaye M (2016). Variability in aboveground carbon driven by slope aspect and curvature in an eastern deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. [Link] [DOI:10.1139/cjfr-2016-0147]
27. Stielstra CM, Lohse KA, Chorover J, McIntosh JC, Barron-GaffordGA, Perdrial JN, et al. (2015). Climatic and landscape influences on soil moisture are primary determinants of soil carbon fluxes in seasonally snow-covered forest ecosystems. Biogeochemistry. 123:447-465. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10533-015-0078-3]
28. Swetnam TL, Brooks PD, Barnard HR, Harpold AA, Gallo EL (2017). Topographically driven differences in energy and water constrain climatic control on forest carbon sequestration. ECOSPHERE. 8(4):e01797. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ecs2.1797]
29. Tashi S, Singh B, Keitel C, Adams M (2016). Soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in forests along an altitudinal gradient in the eastern Himalayas and a meta-analysis of global data. Global Change Biology. 22(6):2255-2268. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/gcb.13234]
30. Taylor P, Asner G, Dahlin K, Anderson C, Knapp D, Martin R, et al. (2015). Landscape-scale controls on aboveground forest carbon stocks on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. PLoS ONE. 10:e0126748. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126748]
31. Thompson JA, Kolka RK (2005). Soil carbon storage estimation in a forested watershed using quantitative soil-landscape modeling. Soil Science Society of America. 69(4):1086-1093. [Link] [DOI:10.2136/sssaj2004.0322]
32. Varamesh S, Hosseini SM, Sefidi K (2015). Assessment of carbon sequestration content in biomass, Robinia pseudoacacia and Cupressus arizonica stands around Tehran. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 16(1):396-404. [Persian] [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA