Persian
Language
Geographical Research is Published in Persian Fulltext.
Volume 36, Issue 3 (2021)
GeoRes 2021, 36(3): 323-331 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/01/3 | Accepted: 2021/02/20 | Published: 2021/09/21
Received: 2021/01/3 | Accepted: 2021/02/20 | Published: 2021/09/21
How to cite this article
Kamran Dastjerdi H. City and Urbanism in Political Geography. GeoRes 2021; 36 (3) :323-331
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1060-en.html
URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-1060-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
H. Kamran Dastjerdi *
Department of Political Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (1528 Views)
Introduction: Urban politics is one of the fields of study that has attracted the attention of political geographers since the '60s and since the mid-90s, the emergence of specialized approaches such as urban political geography and urban geopolitics has entered the field of political geography and geographers. They have provided expert opinions and views in this field. Siri in the thought of famous philosophers shows the early attention of the city to politics. They studied the city as a political society, where human potential nature could be actualized and perfected. Therefore, the study of the city in time periods has been more focused on politics and political planning; because the city was considered the place and bed of human growth. In this review study, the political, economic and cultural issues of the city and urbanism in political geography at the micro level were studied.
Conclusion: The study of the relationship between politics and urban space is very important in the development of political geography and the study of political geographers. From the point of view of political geographers, the city and the citizen as the main actors are changing the scope of power and sovereignty of countries in the world. In fact, developed countries are the hosts of global cities. Today, the most key decisions are made in the political, economic, and cultural dimensions on an urban scale; that is, where power is concentrated and ultimately finds its way into the changing structures of world economics and politics.
Conclusion: The study of the relationship between politics and urban space is very important in the development of political geography and the study of political geographers. From the point of view of political geographers, the city and the citizen as the main actors are changing the scope of power and sovereignty of countries in the world. In fact, developed countries are the hosts of global cities. Today, the most key decisions are made in the political, economic, and cultural dimensions on an urban scale; that is, where power is concentrated and ultimately finds its way into the changing structures of world economics and politics.
Keywords:
References
1. Agnew J (2002). Making political geography. London: Hodder Education Publishers. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780203764343]
2. Ahmadipour Z, Ghorchi M, Ghaderi Hajat M (2012). Explaining the position of urban development in the development of geopolitical spheres of influence. Journal of Urban Geography and Urban Development. 1(1):157. [Persian] [Link]
3. Badiee Azandehie M, Hosseini N (2020). A systemic approach to the city, as a political-spatial system from Kuhn and Sojan's point of view. International Quarterly of Geopolitics. 16(58):157-186. [Persian] [Link]
4. Bellu LG, Cistulli V, Marta S, Timpano F (2011). Assessing regional competitiveness: Analysis of stock indicators and flows variables. 51st Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "New Challenges for European Regions and Urban Areas in a Globalised World", 30 August - 3 September 2011, Barcelona, Spain, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve.1-21. [Link]
5. Cohen SB (2003). Geopolitics of the world system. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. [Link]
6. Cox KR (1984). Neighborhood conflict and urban social movements: Questions of historicity, class, and social change. Urban Geography. 5(4):343-355. [Link] [DOI:10.2747/0272-3638.5.4.343]
7. Cox KR, Nartowicz FZ (1980). Jurisdictional fragmentation in the American metropolis: alternative perspectives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 4(2):196-211. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1980.tb00360.x]
8. Darskhan R, Jafari Paybandi SMH (2018). Analysis of the effects of Islamic political economy on sustainable urban development (case: Zanjan city). Journal of Urban Economics and Management. 6(1):15-31. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/iueam.6.21.15]
9. Dalby S (2008). Imperialism, domination, culture: The continued relevance of critical geopolitics. Geopolitics. 13(3):413-436. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14650040802203679]
10. Flint C (2017). Introduction to geopolitics. London: Rutledge. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781315640044]
11. Hall P (1995). Toward a general urban theory. Unknown translator. Tehran: Tehran Municipality Studies Center Publications. [Persian] [Link]
12. Harvey D, Potter S (2013). The right to be in a justice-driven city, a collection of articles in search of a justice-driven city. Tehran: Tehran Municipality Studies Center Publications. [Link]
13. Hosseini N (2018). Explanation of city's phenomenon in geopolitics and political geography [Dissertation]. Tehran: University of Tehran. [Link]
14. Kamran Dastjerdi H, Badiei M, Zaki Y, Ahmadi A, Hossayni Nasrabadi N (2018). Study of the city in geopolitics and political geography with emphasis on Gutman & Cox Theory. Geography. 16(56):192-207. [Persian] [Link]
15. Kazemi AA (2001). Globalization of Culture and Politics (a critical and epistemological analysis). Tehran: Qoms Publications. [Persian] [Link]
16. Khalilabadi H (2011). Urban geopolitics. Tehran: Sharif Innovators Research. [Persian] [Link]
17. Kony L, Yeho, B (2003). The politics of Landscappe in Singapore. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. [Link]
18. Malinofski B (2000). Scientific theory of culture. Zarrin Ghalam A, translator. Tehran: New Step. [Persian] [Link]
19. Marchetti R (2017). City Diplomacy, how do you analyze the present status of city diplomacy. Urban Geography Research. 1(15). [Link]
20. Mohammadi M, Shahivandi A, Moradi Chadgani D, Rastghalam N (2019). Assessing the impact of competitiveness on urban network transformation using social network analysis (case: Isfahan city-region). Journal of Urban Economics and Management. 7(25):1-15. [Persian]. [Link]
21. Moghimi SM (2015). Local government administration: The councils and municipalities management. Tehran: SAMT. [Persian] [Link]
22. Mirhaydar D, Mirahmadi F (2018). Evolution of ideas in political geography. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [Persian] [Link]
23. Parhiezgar A, Ismaelzadeh H (2005). A systemic approach to geography and urban planning. Journal of the Development of Geography Education. 71:40-48. [Persian] [Link]
24. Purcell M (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 27(3):564-590. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.00467]
25. Sadeghi M, Rabiee H, Ghorchi M, Abdi A (2020). Explaining the role of capitalist economics and stream space in the emergence and role of global cities. Geopolitical. 16(1):110-137. [Persian]. [Link]
26. Sassen S (2001). Global cities and developementalist states: How to derail what could be an interesting debate: A response to Hill and Kim. Urban Studies. 38(13):2537-2540. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00420980120094650]
27. Sassen S (2006). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE puplications. [Link]
28. Sassen S (2007). A sociology of globalization. New York: WW Norton & Co. [Link]
29. Soja EW (1974). A paradigm for the geographical analysis of political systems. In: Cox KR, Reynolds DR, Rokkan S. Locational approaches to power and conflict. New York: John Wiley & Son. [Link]
30. Short JR (2017). Metropolitan World. Davoodi M, translator. Unknown city: Papoli Publications. [Link]
31. Taylor PJ (1982). A Materialist framework for political geography. Transaction of the institute of British Geographers. 7(1):15-34. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/621909]
32. Taylor PJ (2008). The geography of uneven development. London: SAGE Publication. [Link]
33. Veicy H (2015). Concepts and theories of political geography. Tehran: SAMAT. [Persian] [Link]
34. Vasegh M, Hosseini NS, Jafari M (2016). Political geography as an experimental science. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 48(2):389-405. [Persian] [Link]
35. Zaki Y, Valigholizadeh A (2015). Space scales in political geography. Tehran: Tehran University. [Persian] [Link]